Physics GRE Requirements Create Uneven Playing Field for Graduate Applicants

被引:4
|
作者
Owens, Lindsay M. [1 ]
Zwickl, Benjamin M. [2 ]
Franklin, Scott, V [2 ]
Miller, Casey W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rochester Inst Technol, Sch Chem & Mat Sci, 84 Lomb Mem Dr, Rochester, NY 14623 USA
[2] Rochester Inst Technol, Sch Phys & Astron, 84 Lomb Mem Dr, Rochester, NY 14623 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1119/perc.2020.pr.Owens
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The use of the Physics GRE in graduate admissions has gained considerable attention in recent years. While studies have shown the problematic nature of the exam quantitatively, it is time that student experiences were also included in the discussion. In this qualitative study, we interviewed 69 current graduate physics and astronomy students about their process of deciding where to apply to graduate school. Physics GRE requirements played a substantial role in this decision, with 48 students mentioning the test as part of their process to narrow programs down to a personalized short-list. Participants discussed potential barriers (e.g., financial and travel) that affected some students, but not others, which created an unequal playing field for grad school applicants. Secondly, while the participants noticed a shift towards more departments having "optional" GRE language, female student participants still felt the need to take and submit their Physics GRE scores, while male student participants truly saw "optional" as optional. These results suggest that graduate programs requiring the Physics GRE are doing more than asking prospective graduate students to simply take a physics test, and that the use of 'optional' requirement language may be inadvertently disadvantaging the very students that they are trying to recruit.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 387
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The poverty of forestry policy: double standards on an uneven playing field
    Larson, Anne M.
    Ribot, Jesse C.
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2007, 2 (02) : 189 - 204
  • [22] The ubit: Leveling an uneven playing field or tilting a level one?
    Knoll, Michael S.
    FORDHAM LAW REVIEW, 2007, 76 (02) : 857 - 892
  • [23] An Uneven Playing Field: Rankings and Ratings for Economics in ERA 2010
    Bloch, Harry
    ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2012, 31 (04): : 418 - 427
  • [24] Optimal Position for Intubation in the ICU An Uneven Playing Field? Response
    Semler, Matthew W.
    Janz, David R.
    Casey, Jonathan D.
    Russell, Derek W.
    Rice, Todd W.
    CHEST, 2017, 152 (06) : 1351 - 1351
  • [25] Quadruple-Negative Breast Cancer: An Uneven Playing Field
    Saini, Geetanjali
    Bhattarai, Shristi
    Gogineni, Keerthi
    Aneja, Ritu
    JCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 : 233 - 237
  • [26] Reducing REDD risks: affirmative policy on an uneven playing field
    Ribot, Jesse
    Larson, Anne M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE COMMONS, 2012, 6 (02): : 233 - 254
  • [27] An uneven playing field: Experiences of female legal practitioners in Zimbabwe
    Maunganidze, Farai
    Bonnin, Debby
    GENDER WORK AND ORGANIZATION, 2021, 28 (01): : 155 - 174
  • [28] Leveling the playing field: An orientation to graduate study in sociology
    Davis, SN
    Bissler, DL
    Leiter, J
    TEACHING SOCIOLOGY, 2001, 29 (04) : 454 - 462
  • [29] Aiding applicants: leveling the playing field within the immediate acceptance mechanism
    Christian Basteck
    Marco Mantovani
    Review of Economic Design, 2023, 27 : 187 - 220
  • [30] Aiding applicants: leveling the playing field within the immediate acceptance mechanism
    Basteck, Christian
    Mantovani, Marco
    REVIEW OF ECONOMIC DESIGN, 2023, 27 (01) : 187 - 220