Cancer-related chronic pain: Investigation of the novel analgesic drug candidate cebranopadol in a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial

被引:26
|
作者
Eerdekens, Marie-Henriette [1 ]
Kapanadze, Sofia [1 ]
Koch, Erika Dietlind [1 ]
Kralidis, Georg [1 ]
Volkers, Gisela [1 ]
Ahmedzai, Sam Hjelmeland [2 ]
Meissner, Winfried [3 ]
机构
[1] Grunenthal GmbH, Aachen, Germany
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Oncol, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Jena Univ Hosp, Dept Palliat Care, Jena, Germany
关键词
NOCICEPTIN/ORPHANIN FQ PEPTIDE; OPIOID RECEPTOR AGONIST; 1ST-IN-CLASS; PREVALENCE; CARE;
D O I
10.1002/ejp.1331
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Cancer-related pain is a growing health problem given the increasing life expectancy of cancer patients. Opioids are commonly used to treat cancer-related pain, but carry the risk of severe side effects, limiting their use. Cebranopadol is a first-in-class drug candidate, combining nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide and opioid peptide receptor agonism. This trial examined the analgesic efficacy of cebranopadol compared with morphine prolonged release (PR) in patients with moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain. Methods This double-blind, parallel-group, multiple-dose trial was designed as noninferiority trial for efficacy of cebranopadol versus morphine PR. Planned with 524 patients, finally 126 patients were treated for up to 7 weeks (low accrual). The primary efficacy endpoint was the average amount of daily rescue medication intake (morphine immediate release) over the last 2 weeks of treatment. Results For the primary endpoint, noninferiority of cebranopadol with and superiority over morphine PR were demonstrated (Full Analysis Set: increment [95%CI] = -7.48 mg [-12.05, -2.92]; Per Protocol Set: increment [95%CI] = -4.67 mg [-9.25, -0.10]). The vast majority of patients (>= 75%, either treatment) had clinically relevant pain reduction, and noninferiority on this secondary endpoint was not shown. Mostly used doses were <= 800 mu g cebranopadol or <= 120 mg morphine PR daily. A total of 83.1% of patients on cebranopadol and 82.0% on morphine PR experienced treatment-emergent adverse events. Conclusions Cebranopadol was effective, safe and well tolerated in the dose range tested (200-1,000 mu g) in patients suffering from chronic moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain and was superior to morphine PR on the primary endpoint. Significance: Cebranopadol presents a new approach to treat cancer pain. The drug candidate was easy to titrate, safe and well tolerated, and as effective as morphine PR in patients suffering from chronic moderate-to-severe cancer-related pain
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 588
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND CROSSOVER TRIAL OF INTRAVENOUS LIDOCAINE IN THE TREATMENT OF NEUROPATHIC CANCER PAIN
    BRUERA, E
    RIPAMONTI, C
    BRENNEIS, C
    MACMILLAN, K
    HANSON, J
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 1992, 7 (03) : 138 - 140
  • [32] Challenges in designing a randomized, double-blind noninferiority trial for treatment of acne: The SD-ACNE trial
    Barbieri, John S.
    Ellenberg, Susan
    Grice, Elizabeth
    Tierney, Ann
    Vanderbeek, Suzette Baez
    Papadopoulos, Maryte
    Mason, Jennifer
    Mason, Anabel
    Dattilo, James
    Margolis, David J.
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2025, 22 (01) : 66 - 76
  • [33] The analgesic properties of propofol and its solvent: a double-blind, randomized crossover trial
    Bandschapp, O.
    Filitz, J.
    Urwyler, A.
    Koppert, W.
    Ruppen, W.
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2008, 138 (41-42) : 13S - 13S
  • [34] Multimodal therapy in cancer-related fatigue: a phase 3, prospective, randomized, double blind trial
    Schiappacasse Cocio, Guido
    Gonzalez Soto, Patricio
    GACETA MEXICANA DE ONCOLOGIA, 2015, 14 (02): : 85 - 91
  • [35] A double-blind, randomized trial of duloxetine versus placebo in the management of chronic low back pain
    Skljarevski, V.
    Ossanna, M.
    Liu-Seifert, H.
    Zhang, Q.
    Chappell, A.
    Iyengar, S.
    Detke, M.
    Backonja, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2009, 16 (09) : 1041 - 1048
  • [36] Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: A double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Choi, Woo-Jong
    Hwang, Seung-Jun
    Song, Jun-Gol
    Leem, Jeong-Gil
    Kang, Yong-Up
    Park, Pyong-Hwan
    Shin, Jin-Woo
    PAIN, 2011, 152 (03) : 481 - 487
  • [37] The efficacy of corticosteroids in periradicular infiltration for chronic radicular pain - A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial
    Ng, L
    Chaudhary, N
    Sell, P
    SPINE, 2005, 30 (08) : 857 - 862
  • [38] Efficacy and Safety of Jollab (a Saffron-Based Beverage) on Cancer-Related Fatigue in Breast Cancer Patients: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial
    Mirzaei, Hamidreza
    Gharehgozlou, Reyhaneh
    Heydarirad, Ghazaleh
    Fahimi, Shirin
    Ghafari, Saeedeh
    Mosavat, Seyed Hamdollah
    Moghani, Mona Malekzadeh
    Hajian, Parastoo
    COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (06) : 437 - 445
  • [39] Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Fulranumab as adjunctive therapy for cancer-related pain: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study
    Slatkin, N.
    Zaki, N.
    Sanga, P.
    Wang, S.
    Louie, I.
    Kelly, K.
    Thipphawong, J.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2016, 17 (04): : S70 - S71
  • [40] Double-blind randomized trial of bupropion SR for the treatment of neuropathic pain
    Semenchuk, MR
    Sherman, SJ
    Davis, BE
    NEUROLOGY, 2001, 56 (08) : A204 - A204