Accessibility Inequality and Income Disparity in Urban China: A Case Study of Guangzhou

被引:23
|
作者
Chen, Zifeng [1 ]
Yeh, Anthony Gar-On [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Urban Planning & Design, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
3SFCA; inequality; service accessibility; suburbanization; urban China; HEALTH-CARE; SPATIAL MISMATCH; SPACE-TIME; ACCESS; LOCATION; SUBURBANIZATION; TRANSFORMATION; NEIGHBORHOODS; TRANSITION; EMPLOYMENT;
D O I
10.1080/24694452.2018.1470923
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Unlike in Western cities, where the poor population tends to be concentrated in the deprived inner-city areas and experiences low accessibility, the geographic distribution of the low-income population in Chinese cities might be relatively dispersed across accessibility-rich and accessibility-poor areas. This study aims to examine the relationships between income disparity and accessibility inequality in Chinese cities, as well as to identify the particular group of low-income residents who are at risk of inaccessibility. We conducted an empirical study in the city of Guangzhou, China, based on the population census, points of interest, and road network data and measured accessibility based on the three-step floating catchment area (3SFCA) method. Results reveal that although the essential services are significantly concentrated in the central-city areas, the geographic distribution of the low-income population is considerably dispersed across the central-city and suburban areas, thereby indicating the possibility of considerable intragroup inequality of accessibility among the low-income group. The findings from the regression analyses suggest that although urban development in Chinese cities has not resulted in the distinct residential segregation observed in Western cities, the low-income population might still face a dilemma between small floor area and low service accessibility. The study also reveals that nonlocal residents as well as nonurban hukou holders among the low-income population living in suburban areas also experience low service accessibility, which highlights the importance of incorporating hukou as an explanatory variable in analyzing accessibility inequality issues in the Chinese context.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 141
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Misestimation of Urban-Rural Income Inequality in China
    Cai, Yajing
    Ding, Yi
    Guo, Yongyu
    SOCIAL JUSTICE RESEARCH, 2024, 37 (04) : 366 - 381
  • [32] The urban-rural income gap and inequality in China
    Sicular, Terry
    Yue Ximing
    Gustafsson, Bjoern
    Shi, Li
    REVIEW OF INCOME AND WEALTH, 2007, 53 (01) : 93 - 126
  • [33] INCOME INEQUALITY IN URBAN CHINA AND THE ROLE OF STATE SECTOR
    Lee, Jongchul
    HITOTSUBASHI JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2013, 54 (02) : 159 - 176
  • [34] Labor market segmentation and income inequality in urban China
    Zang, XW
    SOCIOLOGICAL QUARTERLY, 2002, 43 (01): : 27 - 44
  • [35] Income Inequality in Urban China, 1978-2005
    Jansen, Wim
    Wu, Xiaogang
    CHINESE SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2012, 45 (01) : 3 - 27
  • [36] Influence of Transportation Accessibility on Urban-rural Income Disparity and Its Spatial Heterogeneity
    HUANG Xiaoyan
    KANG Chenchen
    YIN Chun
    TANG Junqing
    Chinese Geographical Science, 2024, (03) : 453 - 467
  • [37] Migration, Income Inequality, and the Urban Poor in China Introduction
    Song, Shunfeng
    CHINESE ECONOMY, 2009, 42 (04) : 3 - 6
  • [38] Educational inequality and income inequality: An empirical study on China
    Yang Jun
    Huang Xiao
    Li Xiaoyu
    FRONTIERS OF EDUCATION IN CHINA, 2009, 4 (03) : 413 - 434
  • [39] The Impact of Rail Transit on Accessibility and Spatial Equity of Public Transit: A Case Study of Guangzhou, China
    Chen, Huiling
    Yang, Wenyue
    Li, Tao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (18)
  • [40] The dust retention capacities of urban vegetation—a case study of Guangzhou, South China
    Lu Liu
    Dongsheng Guan
    M. R. Peart
    Gang Wang
    Hui Zhang
    Zhiwei Li
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013, 20 : 6601 - 6610