Feasibility of percutaneous implantation of transapical endocardial left ventricular pacing electrode for cardiac resynchronization therapy

被引:20
|
作者
Kassai, Imre [1 ]
Friedrich, Orsolya [2 ]
Ratnatunga, Chandi [2 ]
Betts, Timothy R. [2 ]
Mihalcz, Attila [1 ]
Szili-Torok, Tamas [3 ]
机构
[1] Gottsegen Hungarian Inst Cardiol, Dept Cardiac Surg, Budapest, Hungary
[2] John Radcliffe Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Oxford OX3 9DU, England
[3] Erasmus MC, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Thoraxctr, Rotterdam, Netherlands
来源
EUROPACE | 2011年 / 13卷 / 11期
关键词
Heart failure; Biventricular pacing; Trans-apical; Percutaneous; HEART-FAILURE; STIMULATION; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1093/europace/eur190
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Failure of coronary sinus lead implantation for resynchronization therapy requires alternative approaches. For such events we have developed a transapical implantation technique as a feasible alternative. We report the outcome of this technique and its evolution from a minithoracotomy to a percutaneous approach. Twenty patients underwent alternative resynchronization therapy with transapical endocardial left ventricular (LV) pacing lead implantation in a multicentre, international study between October 2007 and March 2010. Eighteen patients underwent minithoracotomy and transapical puncture under direct observation. Two recent patients had transthoracic echocardiography- guided percutaneous apical puncture to enter the LV cavity. A 19 or 21 ga needle and two-stage Seldinger dilatation with 4 and 7 Fr sheaths were then used to introduce the lead. In the two patients with closed-chest insertion of the electrode there was no puncture related bleeding or lung damage. Lead dislocation occurred in two minithoracotomy patients. Repositioning was performed without reopening the pleural cavity. One patient developed right-sided implanted cardiac defibrillator lead endocarditis requiring complete system removal. Twelve patients have >1 year follow-up; all have sustained and significant improvement in LV dimensions (diastolic Delta 4.2 +/- 2.9, systolic Delta 7.2 +/- 5.8 mm), ejection fraction (Delta 9.5 +/- 9.6%), and functional status (Delta 1.1 +/- 0.3). Transapical placement of LV endocardial pacing lead is an effective alternative strategy for cardiac resynchronization. A closed-chest, percutaneous approach is feasible and should offer even less invasive intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:1653 / 1657
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Feasibility of left ventricular endocardial lead pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Algazzar, Alaa Solaiman
    Taha, Mohamed Osama
    Katta, Azza Ali
    El Abbady, Asmaa
    Lotfy, Heba Abdelmoteleb
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (02): : 53 - 55
  • [2] New method for cardiac resynchronization therapy: transapical endocardial lead implantation for left ventricular free wall pacing
    Kassai, Imre
    Foldesi, Csaba
    Szekely, Andrea
    Szili-Torok, Tamas
    EUROPACE, 2008, 10 (07): : 882 - 883
  • [3] Acute results of left ventricular endocardial pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy obtained with a transapical approach
    Mascioli, Giosue
    Esposito, Giampiero
    Gerometta, Piersilvio
    Michelotti, Federica
    Passaretti, Bruno
    Piti, Antonino
    GIORNALE ITALIANO DI CARDIOLOGIA, 2015, 16 (09) : 508 - 512
  • [4] Is Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing the Future for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?
    Morgan, John M.
    Wiles, Benedict M.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2017, 70 (01): : 14 - 15
  • [5] Cardiac resynchronization therapy with wireless left ventricular endocardial pacing: is this the direction to go?
    Holubec, Tomas
    Beckers, Julius
    Holubcova, Zdenka
    Walter, Veronika
    Walther, Thomas
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2018, 8 (04) : 534 - 537
  • [6] Is endocardial left ventricular pacing better than conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy?
    Margarida Figueiredo, M.
    Paula, S.
    Santos, M.
    Santos, H.
    Coelho, M.
    Almeida, S.
    Lopes, A.
    Almeida, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2023, 25 : 14 - 14
  • [7] A Novel Approach for Endocardial Resynchronization Therapy: Initial Experience with Transapical Implantation of the Left Ventricular Lead
    Kassai, Imre
    Mihalcz, Attila
    Foldesi, Csaba
    Kardos, Attila
    Szili-Torok, Tamas
    HEART SURGERY FORUM, 2009, 12 (03): : E137 - E140
  • [8] Leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing in nonresponders to conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy
    Sidhu, Baldeep S.
    Porter, Bradley
    Gould, Justin
    Sieniewicz, Benjamin
    Elliott, Mark
    Mehta, Vishal
    Delnoy, Peter P. H. M.
    Deharo, Jean-Claude
    Butter, Christian
    Seifert, Martin
    Boersma, Lucas V. A.
    Riahi, Sam
    James, Simon
    Turley, Andrew J.
    Auricchio, Angelo
    Betts, Timothy R.
    Niederer, Steven
    Sanders, Prashanthan
    Rinaldi, Christopher A.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 43 (09): : 966 - 973
  • [9] Improvement of Right Ventricular Hemodynamics with Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing during Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
    Hyde, Eoin R.
    Behar, Jonathan M.
    Crozier, Andrew
    Claridge, Simon
    Jackson, Tom
    Sohal, Manav
    Gill, Jaswinder S.
    O'Neill, Mark D.
    Razavi, Reza
    Niederer, Steven A.
    Rinaldi, Christopher A.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2016, 39 (06): : 531 - +
  • [10] Endocardial left ventricular pacing improves cardiac resynchronization therapy in canine LBBB hearts
    van Deursen, Caroline
    van Hunnik, Arne
    Kuiper, Marion
    Auricchio, Angelo
    Echt, Debra
    Prinzen, Frits W.
    CIRCULATION, 2007, 116 (16) : 555 - 555