Controlling Gas Mobility in Water-Alternating Gas Injection by Surfactant Blend Formulations

被引:0
|
作者
Memon, Muhammad Khan [1 ]
Elraies, Khaled Abdalla [1 ]
Al-Mossawy, Mohammed Idrees [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol PETRONAS, Dept Petr Engn, Tronoh 32610, Perak Darul Rid, Malaysia
关键词
Foam; Mobility reduction factor; Porous media; Surfactant blend; Surfactant-alternating gas; FOAM; FLOW;
D O I
10.1007/978-981-10-3650-7_16
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业];
学科分类号
0820 ;
摘要
Controlling the viscous fingering in water-alternating gas injection, addition of foam with injection water is more favorable. The use of foam surfactant is one of the potential solutions for reducing the gas mobility. The main objective of this study is to generate stable foam for gas mobility control using surfactant blend formulations. Surfactant blend synergistically exhibit better foaming properties than those of individual surfactant. The blend contains anionic as primary surfactant and amphoteric as a foam stabilizer. Surfactant blend improves the foam stability and reduces the destabilizing effect of crude oil. Alpha olefin sulfonate (AOSC14-16) is selected as a primary surfactant. Amphoteric surfactant lauryl amido propyl amine oxide (LMDO) is selected as an additive. The foam was generated in the absence of crude oil in porous media by using Berea sandstone core samples at 96 degrees C and 1400 psi. The increase in differential pressure showed reduction in gas mobility. The average mobility reduction factors of surfactant blend 0.6% AOS and 0.6% AOS + 0.6% LMDO at reservoir conditions were resulted as 2.5 and 4.35, respectively. The experimental results showed that the blend formulations play an imperative role in minimizing gas mobility during water-alternating gas injection.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 203
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ensemble-Based Optimization of the Water-Alternating-Gas-Injection Process
    Chen, Bailian
    Reynolds, Albert C.
    SPE JOURNAL, 2016, 21 (03): : 786 - 798
  • [32] Experimental investigation on precipitation damage during water alternating flue gas injection
    Wang, Zhouhua
    Zhang, Yuping
    Liao, Haoqi
    OIL & GAS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-REVUE D IFP ENERGIES NOUVELLES, 2020, 75
  • [33] An experimental study of alternative hot water alternating gas injection in a fractured model
    Ebadati, Amirhossein
    Akbari, Erfan
    Davarpanah, Afshin
    ENERGY EXPLORATION & EXPLOITATION, 2019, 37 (03) : 945 - 959
  • [34] A comprehensive review on Enhanced Oil Recovery by Water Alternating Gas (WAG) injection
    Afzali, Shokufe
    Rezaei, Nima
    Zendehboudi, Sohrab
    FUEL, 2018, 227 : 218 - 246
  • [35] Relative Permeability Characterization for Water-Alternating-Gas Injection in Oil Reservoirs
    Shahverdi, H.
    Sohrabi, M.
    SPE JOURNAL, 2016, 21 (03): : 799 - 808
  • [36] Experimental investigation of CO2 in continuous and water alternating gas injection
    Sarlak, M.
    Farbod, A.
    Nezhad, S. A. Tabatabaei
    Sahraei, E.
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 39 (06) : 165 - 174
  • [37] Prediction of Oil Recovery Factor in Stratified Reservoirs after Immiscible Water-Alternating Gas Injection Based on PSO-, GSA-, GWO-, and GA-LSSVM
    Andersen, Pal ostebo
    Nygard, Jan Inge
    Kengessova, Aizhan
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (02)
  • [38] Mechanistic simulation of continuous gas injection period during surfactant-alternating-gas (SAG) processes using foam catastrophe theory
    Afsharpoor, A.
    Lee, G. S.
    Kam, S. I.
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2010, 65 (11) : 3615 - 3631
  • [39] A relative permeability model to derive fractional-flow functions of water-alternating-gas and surfactant-alternating-gas foam core-floods
    Al-Mossawy, Mohammed Idrees
    Demiral, Birol
    Raja, D. M. Anwar
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS AND ENGINEERING, 2013, 10 (02)
  • [40] Spatiotemporal Variations in the Connectivity of Wetting and Nonwetting Phases during Water Alternating Gas injection
    Ganguly, Eliza
    Misra, Siddharth
    ENERGY & FUELS, 2021, 35 (02) : 1129 - 1142