The clinical significance of flow cytometry crossmatching in heart transplantation

被引:0
|
作者
Aziz, S [1 ]
Hassantash, SA [1 ]
Nelson, K [1 ]
Levy, W [1 ]
Kruse, A [1 ]
Reichenbach, D [1 ]
Himes, V [1 ]
Fishbein, D [1 ]
Allen, MD [1 ]
机构
[1] Puget Sound Blood Program, Immunogenet HLA Lab, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Flow cytometry crossmatching is more sensitive than cytotoxic methods in identifying preformed antibodies to donor alloantigens. However, the significance of a positive flow crossmatch remains unknown for a recipient of a heart transplant who has a negative antihuman globulin crossmatch. Methods: Flow crossmatching was performed retrospectively for 92 recipients of a primary cardiac allograft who underwent transplantation with a negative AHG crossmatch. Results: Forty-six patients were flow crossmatch-positive for alloantibody: 20 were positive on both T and B lymphocytes, 12 were positive only on B lymphocytes, and 13 were positive only on T lymphocytes. Eleven had autoantibody invalidating the flow crossmatch with donor cells. Thirty-six patients had negative flow crossmatch, A significantly higher incidence of graft dysfunction with vascular rejection by 6 months was found for patients who had a positive flow crossmatch on B lymphocytes. This group also had an increased incidence of mortality within this same period. Patients who were flow crossmatch-positive on T and B lymphocytes were more likely to experience greater than two episodes of treated cellular rejection within the first 6 months. Flow crossmatch-positive patients stayed longer in the hospital in comparison to the other two groups, although the increases were not statistically significant. There were no differences between groups with regard to time to first rejection, absence of rejection episodes, episodes of decreased cardiac index (<2.3 L/m(2)), depressed left and right ventricular ejection fraction, or development of transplant atherosclerosis. Conclusion: A positive flow crossmatch identified a subset of patients who are predisposed to development of vascular rejection or are more likely to have frequent cellular rejection.
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 692
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] T-cell crossmatching: A cytotoxic method with sensitivity and specificity close to that of flow cytometry.
    Steen, SI
    Abtahi, S
    Inokuchi, S
    HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY, 1997, 55 : 86 - 86
  • [42] IgG Subtyping in Heart Transplantation Across a Positive Flow-Cytometry Cross Match
    Feliberti, Jason P.
    Rao, Prakash
    Deo, Dayanand
    Almendral, Jesus
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2016, 22 (08) : S115 - S115
  • [43] The Clinical Significance of Minimal Residual Disease Detected By Multiparametric Flow Cytometry in Acute Leukemia
    Huang, Fen
    Jing, Hui
    Yi, Zhengshan
    Wei, Xiaolei
    Zheng, Zhongxin
    Xie, Muchen
    Feng, Ru
    BLOOD, 2014, 124 (21)
  • [44] CLINICAL APPLICATION OF FLOW CYTOMETRY
    CROMBAG, N
    BAUER, F
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 1979, 100 (05) : 602 - 603
  • [45] Flow cytometry in clinical pathology
    Virgo, Paul F.
    Gibbs, Graham J.
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2012, 49 : 17 - 28
  • [46] CLINICAL FLOW-CYTOMETRY
    TAYLOR, IW
    MEDICAL AND PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 1983, 11 (03): : 196 - 196
  • [47] Clinical applications of flow cytometry
    Bakke, AC
    LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2000, 31 (02) : 97 - 102
  • [48] Flow cytometry in clinical practice
    Antal-Szalmás, P
    Aleksza, M
    Sipka, S
    Szegedi, G
    CYTOMETRY, 2001, 46 (03): : 195 - 196
  • [49] Clinical significance of tricuspid valve dysfunction after orthotopic heart transplantation
    Aziz, TM
    Saad, RA
    Burgess, MI
    Campbell, CS
    Yonan, NA
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 21 (10): : 1101 - 1108
  • [50] Predictors and clinical significance of pericardial effusions after pediatric heart transplantation
    McAree, Daniel
    Yu, Sunkyung
    Schumacher, Kurt R.
    Lowery, Ray
    McCormick, Amanda D.
    Thorsson, Thor
    Peng, David M.
    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 26 (01)