Extended Bose-Hubbard model on a honeycomb lattice

被引:34
|
作者
Gan, Jing Yu [1 ]
Wen, Yu Chuan
Ye, Jinwu
Li, Tao
Yang, Shi-Jie
Yu, Yue
机构
[1] Tsing Hua Univ, Ctr Adv Study, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Theoret Phys, Beijing 100080, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Interdisciplinary Ctr Theoret Studies, Beijing 100080, Peoples R China
[4] Penn State Univ, Dept Phys, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[5] Renmin Univ China, Dept Phys, Beijing 100872, Peoples R China
[6] Beijing Normal Univ, Dept Phys, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW B | 2007年 / 75卷 / 21期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevB.75.214509
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
We study the extended Bose-Hubbard model on a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice by using large-scale quantum Monte Carlo simulations. We present the ground-state phase diagrams for both the hard-core and the soft-core bosons. For the hard-core case, the transition between the rho=1/2 solid and the superfluid is first order, and the supersolid state is unstable toward phase separation. For the soft-core case, due to the presence of multiple occupation, a stable particle-induced supersolid (SS-p) phase emerges when 1/2 <rho < 1. The transition from the solid at rho=1/2 to the SS-p phase is second order with the superfluid density scaling as rho(s)similar to rho-1/2. The SS-p phase has the same diagonal order as the solid at rho=1/2. As the chemical potential increases further, the SS-p phase turns into a solid where two bosons occupy each site of one sublattice through a first-order transition. We also calculate the critical exponents of the transition between the rho=1/2 solid and superfluid at the Heisenberg point for the hard-core case. We find the dynamical critical exponent z=0.15, which is smaller than results obtained on smaller lattices. This indicates that z approaches zero in the thermodynamic limit, and thus the transition is also first order even at the Heisenberg point.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Variational identification of a fractional Chern insulator in an extended Bose-Hubbard model
    Shapourian, Hassan
    Clark, Bryan K.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2016, 93 (03)
  • [42] The inhomogeneous extended Bose-Hubbard model: A mean-field theory
    Kurdestany, Jamshid Moradi
    Pai, Ramesh V.
    Pandit, Rahul
    ANNALEN DER PHYSIK, 2012, 524 (3-4) : 234 - 244
  • [43] Super-Tonks-Girardeau quench in the extended Bose-Hubbard model
    Marciniak M.
    Łebek M.
    Kopyciński J.
    Górecki W.
    Ołdziejewski R.
    Pawłowski K.
    Physical Review A, 2023, 108 (04)
  • [44] Supersolid phase of the extended Bose-Hubbard model with an artificial gauge field
    Suthar, K.
    Sable, Hrushikesh
    Bai, Rukmani
    Bandyopadhyay, Soumik
    Pal, Sukla
    Angom, D.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2020, 102 (01)
  • [45] Superfluid-Insulator Phase Transitions of the Extended Bose-Hubbard Model
    Su, Xiao Qiang
    Wang, An Min
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2012, 50 (03) : 500 - 507
  • [46] Exact Solutions of an Extended Bose-Hubbard Model with E 2 Symmetry
    Pan, Feng
    Zhang, Ningyun
    Wang, Qianyun
    Draayer, J. P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 54 (07) : 2204 - 2217
  • [47] Frustration-induced incommensurate solids in the extended Bose-Hubbard model
    Ng, Kwai-Kong
    Yang, Min-Fong
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2021, 103 (12)
  • [48] Mean-field study of the Bose-Hubbard model in the Penrose lattice
    Ghadimi, Rasoul
    Sugimoto, Takanori
    Tohyama, Takami
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2020, 102 (22)
  • [49] Supersolid-superfluid phase separation in the extended Bose-Hubbard model
    Kottmann, Korbinian
    Haller, Andreas
    Acin, Antonio
    Astrakharchik, Grigory E.
    Lewenstein, Maciej
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2021, 104 (17)
  • [50] Strong-coupling perturbation theory for the extended Bose-Hubbard model
    Iskin, M.
    Freericks, J. K.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2009, 79 (05):