Randomized trial of $20 versus $50 incentives to increase physician survey response rates

被引:49
|
作者
Keating, Nancy L. [1 ,2 ]
Zaslavsky, Alan M. [1 ]
Goldstein, Judy [3 ]
West, Dee W. [3 ]
Ayanian, John Z. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] No Calif Canc Ctr, Fremont, CA USA
关键词
physicians; surveys; incentives;
D O I
10.1097/MLR.0b013e318178eb1d
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Recent experiences of survey researchers suggest that physicians are becoming less willing to complete surveys. Objective: To compare response rates to a mailed physician survey with a prepaid check incentive of $20 versus $50. Research Design: Randomized controlled trial. Subjects: Five hundred seventy-eight physicians caring for patients with lung or colorectal cancer in northern California. Measures: Proportion of physicians responding to the survey. Results: Overall, 60.0% of physicians responded to the survey. The response rate was 52.1% for physicians who received a $20 check versus 67.8% for physicians who received a $50 check (P < 0.001). Similar differences in response rates were seen in strata by physician sex, year graduated from medical school, and survey version (all P < 0.001). More than 42% of physicians who received a $50 check responded to the first mailing, compared with only 30.8% of those who received a $20 check (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Among physicians caring for patients with lung cancer or colorectal cancer in nor-them California, a $50 check incentive was much more effective than a $20 check incentive at increasing response rates to a mailed survey. As physicians become increasingly burdened with surveys, larger incentives may be necessary to engage potential respondents and thus maximize response rates.
引用
收藏
页码:878 / 881
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Money talks: non-monetary incentive and Internet administration fail to increase response rates to a physician survey
    Recklitis, Christopher J.
    Campbell, Eric G.
    Kutner, Jean S.
    Bober, Sharon L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 62 (02) : 224 - 226
  • [42] Do postage-stamps increase response rates to postal surveys? A randomized controlled trial
    Harrison, RA
    Holt, D
    Elton, PJ
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 31 (04) : 872 - 874
  • [43] Response rates and representativeness: a lottery incentive improves physician survey return rates
    Robertson, J
    Walkom, EJ
    McGettigan, P
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2005, 14 (08) : 571 - 577
  • [44] The use of incentives in vulnerable populations for a telephone survey: a randomized controlled trial
    Megan Knoll
    Lianne Soller
    Moshe Ben-Shoshan
    Daniel Harrington
    Joey Fragapane
    Lawrence Joseph
    Sebastien La Vieille
    Yvan St-Pierre
    Kathi Wilson
    Susan Elliott
    Ann Clarke
    [J]. BMC Research Notes, 5 (1)
  • [45] Physician response rates to a mail survey by specialty and timing of incentive
    Delnevo, CD
    Abatemarco, DJ
    Steinberg, MB
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 26 (03) : 234 - 236
  • [46] Cash incentives versus defaults for HIV testing: A randomized clinical trial
    Montoy, Juan Carlos C.
    Dow, William H.
    Kaplan, Beth C.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (07):
  • [47] THE IMPACT OF INCENTIVES AND 3 FORMS OF POSTAGE ON MAIL SURVEY RESPONSE RATES
    GITELSON, R
    KERSTETTER, D
    GUADAGNOLO, F
    [J]. LEISURE SCIENCES, 1993, 15 (04) : 321 - 327
  • [48] A Randomized Trial of Social Comparison Feedback and Financial Incentives to Increase Physical Activity
    Patel, Mitesh S.
    Volpp, Kevin G.
    Rosin, Roy
    Bellamy, Scarlett L.
    Small, Dylan S.
    Fletcher, Michele A.
    Osman-Koss, Rosemary
    Brady, Jennifer L.
    Haff, Nancy
    Lee, Samantha M.
    Wesby, Lisa
    Hoffer, Karen
    Shuttleworth, David
    Taylor, Devon H.
    Hilbert, Victoria
    Zhu, Jingsan
    Yang, Lin
    Wang, Xingmei
    Asch, David A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION, 2016, 30 (06) : 416 - 424
  • [49] Irritable bowel syndrome: are incentives useful for improving survey response rates?
    Patten, SB
    Li, FX
    Cook, T
    Hilsden, RJ
    Sutherland, LR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (03) : 256 - 261
  • [50] Effect of Monetary Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates for Midwestern Farmers
    Glas, Zoe E.
    Getson, Jackie M.
    Gao, Yuling
    Singh, Ajay S.
    Eanes, Francis R.
    Esman, Laura A.
    Bulla, Brian R.
    Prokopy, Linda S.
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2019, 32 (02) : 229 - 237