Randomized trial of $20 versus $50 incentives to increase physician survey response rates

被引:49
|
作者
Keating, Nancy L. [1 ,2 ]
Zaslavsky, Alan M. [1 ]
Goldstein, Judy [3 ]
West, Dee W. [3 ]
Ayanian, John Z. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Internal Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] No Calif Canc Ctr, Fremont, CA USA
关键词
physicians; surveys; incentives;
D O I
10.1097/MLR.0b013e318178eb1d
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Recent experiences of survey researchers suggest that physicians are becoming less willing to complete surveys. Objective: To compare response rates to a mailed physician survey with a prepaid check incentive of $20 versus $50. Research Design: Randomized controlled trial. Subjects: Five hundred seventy-eight physicians caring for patients with lung or colorectal cancer in northern California. Measures: Proportion of physicians responding to the survey. Results: Overall, 60.0% of physicians responded to the survey. The response rate was 52.1% for physicians who received a $20 check versus 67.8% for physicians who received a $50 check (P < 0.001). Similar differences in response rates were seen in strata by physician sex, year graduated from medical school, and survey version (all P < 0.001). More than 42% of physicians who received a $50 check responded to the first mailing, compared with only 30.8% of those who received a $20 check (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Among physicians caring for patients with lung cancer or colorectal cancer in nor-them California, a $50 check incentive was much more effective than a $20 check incentive at increasing response rates to a mailed survey. As physicians become increasingly burdened with surveys, larger incentives may be necessary to engage potential respondents and thus maximize response rates.
引用
收藏
页码:878 / 881
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Randomized trial of $5 versus $10 monetary incentives, envelope size, and candy to increase physician response rates to mailed questionnaires
    Halpern, SD
    Ubel, PA
    Berlin, JA
    Asch, DA
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (09) : 834 - 839
  • [2] A charitable donation incentive did not increase physician survey response rates in a randomized trial
    Nesrallah, Gihad
    Barnieh, Lianne
    Manns, Braden
    Clase, Catherine
    Mendelssohn, David
    Guyatt, Gordon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (04) : 482 - 483
  • [3] RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 2 INCENTIVES TO INCREASE RESPONSE RATE TO A MAILED SURVEY
    PERNEGER, TV
    ETTER, JF
    ROUGEMONT, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 138 (08) : 619 - 619
  • [4] Do Noncontingent Incentives Increase Survey Response Rates among Mental Health Providers? A Randomized Trial Comparison
    Kristin M. Hawley
    Jonathan R. Cook
    Amanda Jensen-Doss
    [J]. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2009, 36 : 343 - 348
  • [5] Do Noncontingent Incentives Increase Survey Response Rates among Mental Health Providers? A Randomized Trial Comparison
    Hawley, Kristin M.
    Cook, Jonathan R.
    Jensen-Doss, Amanda
    [J]. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2009, 36 (05) : 343 - 348
  • [6] THE USE OF MONETARY INCENTIVES TO INCREASE SURVEY RESPONSE RATES
    WILK, RJ
    [J]. SOCIAL WORK RESEARCH & ABSTRACTS, 1993, 29 (01): : 33 - 34
  • [7] An advance letter did not increase the response rates in a telephone survey: a randomized trial
    Carey, Renee N.
    Reid, Alison
    Driscoll, Timothy R.
    Glass, Deborah C.
    Benke, Geza
    Fritschi, Lin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2013, 66 (12) : 1417 - 1421
  • [8] Dermatologist response rates to a mailed questionnaire: A randomized trial of monetary incentives
    Wan, Joy
    Abuabara, Katrina
    Shin, Daniel B.
    Troxel, Andrea B.
    Bebo, Bruce F., Jr.
    Gelfand, Joel M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 66 (01) : E18 - E20
  • [9] Maximizing response rates to a survey of dentists: A randomized trial
    Rikard-Bell, G
    Ward, J
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2000, 45 (01) : 46 - 48
  • [10] Randomized control trial of unconditional versus conditional incentives to increase study enrollment rates in participants at increased risk of lung cancer
    Kumar, Anjali D.
    Durham, Danielle D.
    Lane, Lindsay
    Perera, Pasangi
    Rivera, M. Patricia
    Henderson, Louise M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 141 : 11 - 17