机构:
Int Inst Religious Freedom, Bonn, Germany
Observ Religious Freedom Latin Amer, Voorburg, Netherlands
Hague Univ Appl Sci, The Hague, Netherlands
Univ Latinoamer Ciencia & Tecnol, San Jose, San Francisco, Costa Rica
Latin Amer Fac Social Sci UNESCO, Paris, France
Fdn Platform Social Transformat, Voorburg, NetherlandsInt Inst Religious Freedom, Bonn, Germany
Petri, Dennis P.
[1
,2
,3
,4
,5
,6
]
机构:
[1] Int Inst Religious Freedom, Bonn, Germany
[2] Observ Religious Freedom Latin Amer, Voorburg, Netherlands
[3] Hague Univ Appl Sci, The Hague, Netherlands
[4] Univ Latinoamer Ciencia & Tecnol, San Jose, San Francisco, Costa Rica
[5] Latin Amer Fac Social Sci UNESCO, Paris, France
[6] Fdn Platform Social Transformat, Voorburg, Netherlands
religious freedom;
datasets;
rankings;
methodologies;
subnational level;
non-state actors;
STATE;
D O I:
10.1080/15570274.2022.2031064
中图分类号:
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号:
010107 ;
摘要:
In this essay, I discuss three areas where I've identified problems with religious freedom datasets and how they are used by academics and policymakers. First, I discuss the implications of the problematic ways in which religious freedom rankings are being used. Second, I argue that religious freedom violations that can only be observed at the subnational level tend to be overlooked by religious freedom datasets. Finally, I stress the importance of understanding the multidimensionality of religious freedom to avoid oversimplifications of reality. I provide practical recommendations for the improvement of religious freedom datasets and their correct use by policymakers.