The Tyranny of Religious Freedom Rankings

被引:3
|
作者
Petri, Dennis P. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Int Inst Religious Freedom, Bonn, Germany
[2] Observ Religious Freedom Latin Amer, Voorburg, Netherlands
[3] Hague Univ Appl Sci, The Hague, Netherlands
[4] Univ Latinoamer Ciencia & Tecnol, San Jose, San Francisco, Costa Rica
[5] Latin Amer Fac Social Sci UNESCO, Paris, France
[6] Fdn Platform Social Transformat, Voorburg, Netherlands
来源
关键词
religious freedom; datasets; rankings; methodologies; subnational level; non-state actors; STATE;
D O I
10.1080/15570274.2022.2031064
中图分类号
B9 [宗教];
学科分类号
010107 ;
摘要
In this essay, I discuss three areas where I've identified problems with religious freedom datasets and how they are used by academics and policymakers. First, I discuss the implications of the problematic ways in which religious freedom rankings are being used. Second, I argue that religious freedom violations that can only be observed at the subnational level tend to be overlooked by religious freedom datasets. Finally, I stress the importance of understanding the multidimensionality of religious freedom to avoid oversimplifications of reality. I provide practical recommendations for the improvement of religious freedom datasets and their correct use by policymakers.
引用
收藏
页码:82 / 88
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条