Analysis of the electromagnetic field in a controlled enclosure for biological dosimetry - Part 1. Design and validation of the numerical model

被引:0
|
作者
Morega, Mihaela [1 ]
Miclaus, Simona [2 ]
Machedon, Alina [1 ]
机构
[1] Politeh Univ Bucharest, Dept Elect Engn, Bucharest, Romania
[2] Land Forces Acad Nicolae Balcescu, Sibiu, Romania
关键词
FEM analysis of EMF; TEM cell; microwaves dosimetry;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
A numerical and experimental study of the electromagnetic field (EMF) is presented in the paper. It is focused on the investigation of the electric field quality inside a transversal electromagnetic cell (TEM cell), used as a controlled enclosure for biological dosimetry assessment. Inside the cell,the target sample is exposed to EMF in the range of radiofrequency (RF) or microwaves (MW), in conditions that are currently assumed to simulate free-space exposure. The identification and control of some proper exposure conditions are primarily required for the design of the dosimetric experiment. COMSOL Multiphysics is the numerical tool used for finite element (FEM) modeling of the EMF inside the TEM cell. Part I presents the design of the numerical model and its validation, both by experimental and theoretical methods. Some characteristics of the TEM cell are also determined, with the main goal of assessing the uniformity of the electric field in the region where the biological sample is exposed to microwaves. Part 2 directs the FEM analysis of the model to the evaluation of some dosimetric quantities relative to the exposed biological material and analyses the stability of the exposure conditions at small variations of the EMF frequency.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 235
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Numerical simulation of sorbent injection into flue gas for mercury removal in Coal-Fired power Plant. Part 1. Model establishment and validation
    Shen, Ao
    Wang, Yuqing
    Wang, Runlin
    Duan, Yufeng
    Tao, Jun
    Gu, Xiaobing
    Wang, Peng
    Xu, Zhong
    FUEL, 2022, 326
  • [32] COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF HYPERTHERMIA HEATING MODALITIES .1. NUMERICAL-ANALYSIS OF THERMAL DOSIMETRY BRACKETING CASES
    ROEMER, RB
    CETAS, TC
    OLESON, JR
    HALAC, S
    MATLOUBIEH, AY
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 1984, 100 (03) : 450 - 472
  • [33] STUDIES ON BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF LOW-LEVELS OF REACTOR RADIATION-(I) .1. DOSIMETRY AND DOSE EVALUATION IN THE IRRADIATION FIELD
    HONDA, Y
    KIMURA, Y
    OGAWA, Y
    HOSHINO, H
    DOKIYA, T
    KOSUDA, S
    WADA, T
    LIAN, S
    HASHIMOTO, S
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 1983, 24 (01) : 15 - 15
  • [34] Numerical analysis of a model for an axisymmetric guide for electromagnetic waves - Part I: The continuous problem and its Fourier expansion
    Ben Belgacem, F
    Bernardi, C
    Rapetti, F
    MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN THE APPLIED SCIENCES, 2005, 28 (17) : 2007 - 2029
  • [35] NUMERICAL STUDY OF SCATTERED ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELD INSIDE A HOLLOW DIELECTRIC CYLINDER .1. SCATTERING OF A SINGLE BEAM
    DATTA, AK
    SOM, SC
    APPLIED OPTICS, 1975, 14 (07): : 1516 - 1523
  • [36] EXACTLY RENORMALIZABLE MODEL IN QUANTUM FIELD THEORY .1. THE DIAGRAM ANALYSIS
    RUIJGROK, TW
    PHYSICA, 1958, 24 (03): : 185 - 204
  • [37] A review on design and analysis of floating bridges: Numerical simulations, model tests and field measurements
    Wang, Chao
    Cui, Minghao
    Cheng, Zhengshun
    Moan, Torgeir
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2024, 306
  • [38] MOTION OF A CHARGE IN A MAGNETIC DIPOLE FIELD .1. PAINLEVE ANALYSIS AND A CONSERVATIVE NUMERICAL SCHEME
    VAZQUEZ, L
    JIMENEZ, S
    APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 1988, 25 (03) : 207 - 217
  • [39] Experimental modal analysis of SSR1 cryomodule for numerical model tuning and validation
    Barnaba, A.
    Bucchi, F.
    Neri, P.
    Passarelli, D.
    49TH ITALIAN ASSOCIATION FOR STRESS ANALYSIS CONFERENCE (AIAS 2020), 2021, 1038
  • [40] A Diel Method of Estimating Gross Primary Production: 1. Validation With a Realistic Numerical Model of Chesapeake Bay
    Scully, Malcolm E.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2018, 123 (11) : 8411 - 8429