Time-of-flight MR angiography: Comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging - Initial experience

被引:139
|
作者
Willinek, WA
Born, M
Simon, B
Tschampa, HJ
Krautmacher, C
Gieseke, J
Urbach, H
Textor, HJ
Schild, HH
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Dept Radiol, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
[2] Philips Med Syst, Best, Netherlands
关键词
brain; MR; magnetic resonance (MR); vascular studies;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2293020782
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Intracranial three-dimensional time of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography was performed in seven healthy volunteers and eight patients with both 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR systems with standard and high spatial resolutions (true voxel sizes, 0.48 x 0.75 x 2.00 mm and 0.30 x 0.44 x 1.00 mm, respectively). Superior image quality and significantly better depiction of small vessel segments and vascular disease were observed at high-spatial-resolution 3.0-T TOF MR angiography but not at standard 1.5-T or standard 3.0-T TOF MR angiography (P < .01, respectively). Intracranial high-spatial-resolution TOF MR angiography at 3.0-T imaging provides diagnostic improvement in studies of cerebrovascular disease. (C) RSNA, 2003.
引用
收藏
页码:913 / 920
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Detection of hepatic metastases by superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging: prospective comparison between 1.5-T and 3.0-T images in the same patients
    Keitaro Sofue
    Masakatsu Tsurusaki
    Mototaka Miyake
    Aine Sakurada
    Yasuaki Arai
    Kazuro Sugimura
    European Radiology, 2010, 20 : 2265 - 2273
  • [22] Effect of 1.5-T and 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging on the ceramic adhesion and physical properties of prosthetic substructures
    Baysal, Nurten
    Ayyildiz, Simel
    Orujalipoor, Ilghar
    Erol, Baris Filiz
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 124 (06): : 809.e1 - 809.e7
  • [23] Detection of hepatic metastases by superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging: prospective comparison between 1.5-T and 3.0-T images in the same patients
    Sofue, Keitaro
    Tsurusaki, Masakatsu
    Miyake, Mototaka
    Sakurada, Aine
    Arai, Yasuaki
    Sugimura, Kazuro
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (09) : 2265 - 2273
  • [24] MR Imaging of Endometrial Carcinoma for Preoperative Staging at 3.0 T: Comparison With Imaging at 1.5 T
    Hori, Masatoshi
    Kim, Tonsok
    Murakami, Takamichi
    Imaoka, Izumi
    Onishi, Hiromitsu
    Nakamoto, Atsushi
    Nakaya, Yasuhiro
    Tomoda, Kaname
    Tsutsui, Tateki
    Enomoto, Takayuki
    Kimura, Tadashi
    Nakamura, Hironobu
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2009, 30 (03) : 621 - 630
  • [25] Fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity: comparison between 3.0-T and 1.5-T diffusion tensor imaging with parallel imaging using histogram and region of interest analysis
    Fushimi, Yasutaka
    Miki, Yukio
    Okada, Tsutomu
    Yamamoto, Akira
    Mori, Nobuyuki
    Hanakawa, Takashi
    Urayama, Shin-ichi
    Aso, Toshihiko
    Fukuyama, Hidenao
    Kikuta, Ken-ichiro
    Togashi, Kaori
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2007, 20 (08) : 743 - 748
  • [26] Use of 3.0-T MR Imaging for Evaluation of the Abdomen
    Erturk, Sukru Mehmet
    Alberich-Bayarri, Angel
    Herrmann, Karin A.
    Marti-Bonmati, Luis
    Ros, Pablo R.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2009, 29 (06) : 1547 - 1564
  • [27] A COMPARISON OF DEFAULT AND REDUCED BANDWIDTH MR IMAGING OF THE SPINE AT 1.5-T
    KETONEN, L
    TOTTERMAN, S
    SIMON, JH
    FOSTER, TH
    KIDO, DK
    SZUMOWSKI, J
    JOY, SE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 1990, 11 (01) : 9 - 15
  • [28] Intraindividual comparison of high-spatial-resolution abdominal MR angiography at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Initial experience
    Michaely, Henrik J.
    Kramer, Harald
    Dietrich, Olaf
    Nael, Kambiz
    Lodemann, Klaus-Peter
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Schoenberg, Stefan O.
    RADIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (03) : 907 - 913
  • [29] Comparison between 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI for the diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorders
    Bourgioti, Charis
    Zafeiropoulou, Konstantina
    Tzavara, Chara
    Daskalakis, George
    Fotopoulos, Stavros
    Theodora, Marianna
    Nikolaidou, Maria Evangelia
    Konidari, Marianna
    Gourtsoyianni, Sofia
    Panourgias, Evangelia
    Koutoulidis, Vassilis
    Martzoukos, Epameinondas Anastasios
    Konstantinidou, Anastasia Evangelia
    Moulopoulos, Lia Angela
    DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL IMAGING, 2022, 103 (09) : 408 - 417
  • [30] Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer
    Park, Byung Kwan
    Kim, Bohyun
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Kwon, Ghee Young
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2007, 31 (04) : 534 - 538