Time-of-flight MR angiography: Comparison of 3.0-T imaging and 1.5-T imaging - Initial experience

被引:139
|
作者
Willinek, WA
Born, M
Simon, B
Tschampa, HJ
Krautmacher, C
Gieseke, J
Urbach, H
Textor, HJ
Schild, HH
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Dept Radiol, D-53105 Bonn, Germany
[2] Philips Med Syst, Best, Netherlands
关键词
brain; MR; magnetic resonance (MR); vascular studies;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2293020782
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Intracranial three-dimensional time of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography was performed in seven healthy volunteers and eight patients with both 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR systems with standard and high spatial resolutions (true voxel sizes, 0.48 x 0.75 x 2.00 mm and 0.30 x 0.44 x 1.00 mm, respectively). Superior image quality and significantly better depiction of small vessel segments and vascular disease were observed at high-spatial-resolution 3.0-T TOF MR angiography but not at standard 1.5-T or standard 3.0-T TOF MR angiography (P < .01, respectively). Intracranial high-spatial-resolution TOF MR angiography at 3.0-T imaging provides diagnostic improvement in studies of cerebrovascular disease. (C) RSNA, 2003.
引用
收藏
页码:913 / 920
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improved image quality of intracranial aneurysms: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T time-of-flight MR angiography
    Gibbs, GF
    Huston, J
    Bernstein, MA
    Riederer, SJ
    Brown, RD
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2004, 25 (01) : 84 - 87
  • [2] Uterine Cervical Carcinoma: Preoperative Staging with 3.0-T MR Imaging-Comparison with 1.5-T MR Imaging
    Hori, Masatoshi
    Kim, Tonsok
    Murakami, Takamichi
    Imaoka, Izumi
    Onishi, Hiromitsu
    Tomoda, Kaname
    Tsutsui, Tateki
    Enomoto, Takayuki
    Kimura, Tadashi
    Nakamura, Hironobu
    RADIOLOGY, 2009, 251 (01) : 96 - 104
  • [3] 3.0-T MR Imaging of the Abdomen: Comparison with 1.5 T
    Chang, Kevin J.
    Kamel, Ihab R.
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Bluemke, David A.
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2008, 28 (07) : 1983 - 1998
  • [4] Evaluation of the acetabular labrum at 3.0-T MR imaging compared with 1.5-t MR arthrography: Preliminary experience
    Sundberg, TP
    Toomayan, GA
    Major, NM
    RADIOLOGY, 2006, 238 (02) : 706 - 711
  • [5] Diffusion-tensor fiber tractography: Intraindividual comparison of 3.0-T and 1.5-T MR imaging
    Okada, T
    Miki, Y
    Fushimi, Y
    Hanakawa, T
    Kanagaki, M
    Yamamoto, A
    Urayama, S
    Fukuyama, H
    Hiraoka, M
    Togashi, K
    RADIOLOGY, 2006, 238 (02) : 668 - 678
  • [6] Comparison of 3.0-and 1.5-T three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography in Moyamoya disease: Preliminary experience
    Fushimi, Y
    Miki, Y
    Kikuta, K
    Okada, T
    Kanagaki, M
    Yamamoto, A
    Nozaki, K
    Hashimoto, N
    Hanakawa, T
    Fukuyama, H
    Togashi, K
    RADIOLOGY, 2006, 239 (01) : 232 - 237
  • [7] Abdominal applications of 3.0-T MR imaging: Comparative review versus a 1.5-T system
    Choi, Jin-Young
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    Chung, Yong Eun
    Kim, Ki Youn
    Jones, Alun C.
    de Becker, Jan
    van Cauteren, Marc
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2008, 28 (04) : e30
  • [8] Functional 3.0-T MR assessment of higher cognitive function: Are there advantages over 1.5-T imaging?
    Hoenig, K
    Kuhl, CK
    Scheef, L
    RADIOLOGY, 2005, 234 (03) : 860 - 868
  • [9] Volumetric cartilage measurements of porcine knee at 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR imaging: Evaluation of precision and accuracy
    Bauer, Jan S.
    Krause, Stefanie J.
    Ross, Christian J.
    Krug, Roland
    Carballido-Gamio, Julio
    Ozhinsky, Eugene
    Majumdar, Sharmila
    Link, Thomas M.
    RADIOLOGY, 2006, 241 (02) : 399 - 406
  • [10] Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T MR Angiography Compared with Digital Subtraction Angiography
    van den Bosch, Harrie C. M.
    Westenberg, Jos J. M.
    Caris, Ralph
    Duijm, Lucien E. M.
    Tielbeek, Alexander V.
    Cuypers, Philip W. M.
    de Roos, Albert
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 266 (01) : 337 - 346