DEVELOPMENT OF A FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKING MODEL FOR CORPORATE FIRMS

被引:0
|
作者
Ic, Yusuf Tansel [1 ]
Tekin, Muhtesem [1 ]
Pamukoglu, Fazil Ziya [1 ]
Yildirim, S. Erdinc [1 ]
机构
[1] Baskent Univ, Muhendisl Fak, Endustri Muhendisligi Bolumu, TR-06810 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Financial analysis; financial ratio analysis; multi criteria decision making (MCDM); TOPSIS; VIKOR; GRA; MOORA; DECISION-MAKING METHODS; MOORA METHOD; EVALUATE; SELECTION; TOPSIS; ENTERPRISES; PROMETHEE; RANKING; DESIGN; TAIWAN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this study, we developed a financial performance evaluation model to rank the corporate firms of 24 sectors in the Turkish economy. The developed model is based on the financial ratiosand Technique for Order Preference by Similiarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) approach. This model of ferscorporate firm's rating scores with respect to its competitors belonging to the same industry. The developed model is coded in Visual Basic and tested with real case studies. Financial performance evaluation rankings obtained from TOPSIS, Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR), Grey Relational Grade (GRA), and Multi-Objective Optimization on thebasis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) methods were compared by using Spearman's rank correlation test. Based on the test results, it was found that the TOPSIS method is the most appropriate method for the evaluation of financial performance. An application is also provided in the paper for illustrative purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 85
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Corporate social responsibility as sustainability management: international shipping firms and financial performance
    Yang, Ann Shawing
    Mekrangsiman, Suphathus
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND TRANSPORT LOGISTICS, 2023, 16 (1-2) : 120 - 140
  • [42] Corporate Strategic Mission Statements Quality and Financial Performance: An Analysis on Chinese Firms
    Shao Jianbing
    Liu Ligang
    Liu Yu
    Meng Xiushi
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING: ENTERPRISE, ENVIRONMENT AND CRISIS, 2009, : 538 - 544
  • [43] Does corporate financial performance promote ESG: Evidence from US firms
    Hamdi, Khalfaoui
    Guenich, Hassan
    Ben Saada, Moufida
    [J]. COGENT BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT, 2022, 9 (01):
  • [44] Analyzing the impact of corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance: evidence from top Indian firms
    Sekhon, Amritjot Kaur
    Kathuria, Lalit Mohan
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2019, 20 (01): : 143 - 157
  • [45] A fuzzy logic model for benchmarking the knowledge management performance of construction firms
    Kale, Serdar
    Karaman, Erkan A.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2011, 38 (04) : 464 - 475
  • [46] Corporate financial performance due to sustainable development in Vietnam
    Tien Nguyen Hoang
    Anh Dinh Ba Hung
    Ngoc Nguyen Minh
    [J]. CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 27 (02) : 694 - 705
  • [47] The impact of political connection and risk committee on corporate financial performance: evidence from financial firms in Malaysia
    Aldhamari, Redhwan
    Mohamad Nor, Mohamad Naimi
    Boudiab, Mourad
    Mas'ud, Abdulsalam
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2020, 20 (07): : 1281 - 1305
  • [48] How business strategy in non-financial firms moderates the curvilinear effects of corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility on corporate financial performance
    Chen, Chung-Jen
    Guo, Ruey-Shan
    Hsiao, Yung-Chang
    Chen, Kuo-Liang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2018, 92 : 154 - 167
  • [49] CORPORATE-TAXATION AND THE FINANCIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF FIRMS
    PLESKO, GA
    [J]. PUBLIC FINANCE QUARTERLY, 1994, 22 (03): : 311 - 334
  • [50] Corporate board and default risk of financial firms
    Garcia, C. Jose
    Herrero, Begona
    Morillas, Francisco
    [J]. ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2022, 35 (01): : 511 - 528