Carbon Budget of Paddy Fields after Implementing Water-Saving Irrigation in Northeast China

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Tiecheng [1 ,2 ]
Nie, Tangzhe [3 ]
Chen, Peng [4 ]
Zhang, Zuohe [1 ,2 ,5 ]
Lan, Jiaxin [1 ]
Zhang, Zhongxue [1 ,2 ]
Qi, Zhijuan [1 ,2 ]
Han, Yu [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Lili [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Agr Univ, Sch Water Conservancy & Civil Engn, Harbin 150030, Peoples R China
[2] Northeast Agr Univ, Minist Agr & Rural Affairs, Key Lab Agr Water Resources Use, Harbin 150030, Peoples R China
[3] Heilongjiang Univ, Sch Water Conservancy & Elect Power, Harbin 150006, Peoples R China
[4] Hohai Univ, Coll Agr Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210024, Peoples R China
[5] Suihua Univ, Sch Agr & Hydraul Engn, Suihua 152001, Peoples R China
来源
AGRONOMY-BASEL | 2022年 / 12卷 / 06期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
water-saving irrigation; net ecosystem carbon budget; net primary production; carbon mineralized losses; net global warming potential; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; NITROGEN-FERTILIZATION; SOIL RESPIRATION; NO-TILL; RICE; MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM; SEQUESTRATION; BALANCE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/agronomy12061481
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Water-saving irrigation is recognized as an effective agricultural management due to water security and environmental protection problems. In Northeast China, an increasing number of paddy fields are shifting from conventional irrigation to water-saving irrigation. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the carbon (C) budget of paddy fields after implementing water-saving irrigation in Northeast China. A 2-year consecutive field study was performed from 2018 to 2019 using three different irrigation regimes (conventional irrigation (FI), controlled irrigation (CI), and intermittent irrigation (II)) and two nitrogen (N) fertilization levels (110 and 165 kg N ha(-1)) in a paddy field of Northeast China. The present study aimed to quantify the net ecosystem C budget (NECB) and net global warming potential (net GWP) after the implementation of water-saving irrigation in Northeast China. Both CI and II enhanced the C sequestration capacity of this paddy field. The net primary productivity (NPP) under CI and II was higher than FI by 18-38% and 11-33%, respectively, when the same N fertilization level was applied. The NECB ranged from 1151 to 2663 kg C ha(-1), indicating that all treatments acted as net C sinks. II increased the NECB through increasing NPP, which exceeded increased removal of harvest and C mineralized losses. Under II, the NECB was significantly higher than FI and CI when the same N fertilization level was applied (p < 0.05). The net GWP under II and CI was significantly lower than FI (p < 0.05). The net GWP under II was lower than CI when the N fertilization level was 165 kg N ha(-1), but no significant differences were detected. These results demonstrated that the II with 165 kg N ha(-1) of paddy fields strongly decreased net GWP in Northeast China to combat global climate change.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Water-saving and Fertilizer-reducing Effect of Clinoptilolite in Water-saving Irrigated Paddy Fields in Semiarid Areas of Western Liaoning
    Wu Q.
    Chen H.
    Wang Y.
    Chi D.
    [J]. Nongye Jixie Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52 (06): : 305 - 313and406
  • [32] Water rights reform and water-saving irrigation: evidence from China
    Xu, Hang
    Yang, Rui
    Song, Jianfeng
    [J]. WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 88 (11) : 2779 - 2792
  • [33] Difference in carbon budget from marshlands to transformed paddy fields in the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China
    Liu, Xiaohui
    Zhang, Yuan
    Dong, Guihua
    Jiang, Ming
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 137 : 60 - 64
  • [34] Response of Vertical Migration and Leaching of Nitrogen in Percolation Water of Paddy Fields under Water-Saving Irrigation and Straw Return Conditions
    Zheng, Chengxin
    Zhang, Zhanyu
    Wu, Yunyu
    Mwiya, Richwell
    [J]. WATER, 2019, 11 (04):
  • [35] Water-Saving Irrigation Promotion and Food Security: A Study for China
    Yang, Rui
    Gao, Qijie
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [36] Effects and potential of water-saving irrigation for rice production in China
    Zhuang, Yanhua
    Zhang, Liang
    Li, Sisi
    Liu, Hongbin
    Zhai, Limei
    Zhou, Feng
    Ye, Yushi
    Ruan, Shuhe
    Wen, Weijia
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2019, 217 : 374 - 382
  • [37] Effects of Water-Saving Irrigation on Hydrological Cycle in an Irrigation District of Northern China
    Zhang, Manfei
    Wang, Xiao
    Zhou, Weibo
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (15)
  • [38] Study on the Law of Nitrogen Transfer and Conversion and Use of Fertilizer Nitrogen in Paddy Fields under Water-Saving Irrigation Mode
    Xiao, Menghua
    Li, Yuanyuan
    Wang, Jianwen
    Hu, Xiujun
    Wang, Lei
    Miao, Zimei
    [J]. WATER, 2019, 11 (02):
  • [39] IMPACT OF CONTROLLED-RELEASE NITROGEN FERTILIZERS ON AMMONIA VOLATILIZATION FROM PADDY FIELDS UNDER WATER-SAVING IRRIGATION
    Yang, Shihong
    Li, Jiwen
    Xu, Junzeng
    [J]. FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2018, 27 (11): : 7139 - 7147
  • [40] Effects of water-saving irrigation on the residues and risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon in paddy field
    Zhao, Zhenhua
    Xia, Liling
    Jiang, Xin
    Gao, Yanzheng
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 618 : 736 - 745