Knowledge Sharing in Catholic Organizations: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Curado, Carla [1 ]
Graca, Joao [1 ]
Oliveira, Mirian [1 ,2 ]
Fernandes, Alexandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Lisbon Sch Econ & Management, ISEG, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Rio Grande do Sul, Escola Negocios, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
Catholic Organizations; Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis; Knowledge Sharing; Organizational Culture Theory; CULTURE; MANAGEMENT; RELIGION; RITUALS; TRUST;
D O I
10.4018/IJKM.2021070103
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This study examines knowledge sharing in Catholic organizations. The authors adopt Schein's organizational culture theory that facilitates, or inhibits, knowledge sharing in organizations. Thus, they address the phenomenon at the three levels: the artifacts, the norms and values, and the underlying assumptions. Considering the chosen settings, they study the contributions of individuals having taken vows, the organizational rituals, the significance, and the sense of community perceived by the organizational members. Data were gathered using a survey and were analyzed by using a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. The study provides the causal configurations of conditions that lead to tacit, explicit, and total knowledge sharing. They also offer the causal configurations of conditions that lead to the absence of each kind of knowledge sharing. Given that the qualitative results cannot be generalized, the study can still be replicated in organizations without restrictions.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 49
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Political Economy of Intermediate Capital Account Regimes: a Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis
    da Silva, Pedro Perfeito
    [J]. STUDIES IN COMPARATIVE INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 57 (04) : 497 - 524
  • [42] Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research – the rise of a method
    Sascha Kraus
    Domingo Ribeiro-Soriano
    Miriam Schüssler
    [J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2018, 14 : 15 - 33
  • [43] Prerequisites for the Innovation Performance of Artificial Intelligence Laboratory: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis
    Shi, Jincheng
    Wang, Yingchun
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2024, 71 : 5341 - 5356
  • [44] Modeling multiple forms of consumer animosity through fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis
    Antonetti, Paolo
    Manika, Danae
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2022, 56 (01) : 113 - 132
  • [45] Employee work engagement in the digital transformation of enterprises: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis
    Ye, Di
    Xu, Bin
    Wei, Bingling
    Zheng, Linlin
    Wu, Yenchun Jim
    [J]. HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 11 (01):
  • [46] Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in entrepreneurship and innovation research - the rise of a method
    Kraus, Sascha
    Ribeiro-Soriano, Domingo
    Schussler, Miriam
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2018, 14 (01) : 15 - 33
  • [47] Generation Paths of Major Road Accidents Based on Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis
    Lei, Yu
    Zhang, Guirong
    Lu, Shan
    Qian, Jiahuan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (21)
  • [48] Multidimensional paths to regional poverty: a Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis of Colombian departments
    Nieto Aleman, Paula Andrea
    Roig-Tierno, Norat
    Mas-Verdu, Francisco
    Garcia Alvarez-Coque, Jose Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND CAPABILITIES, 2018, 19 (04) : 499 - 520
  • [49] The interplay between literacy and digital technology: a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis approach
    Nikou, Shahrokh
    Molinari, Andrea
    Widen, Gunilla
    [J]. INFORMATION RESEARCH-AN INTERNATIONAL ELECTRONIC JOURNAL, 2020, 25 (04):
  • [50] NATO Burden Sharing in Libya: A Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis
    Haesebrouck, Tim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 2017, 61 (10) : 2235 - 2261