Standing for Women? Which Women? The Substantive Representation of Women's Interests and the Research Imperative of Intersectionality

被引:74
|
作者
Smooth, Wendy [1 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Kirwan Inst Study Race & Ethn, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S1743923X11000225
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In conducting interviews with female African American state legislators, I found that the great debates among women and politics scholars over the meaning of women's issues have not captured a major issue that surfaced time and again in the interviews. The African American women I interviewed affirmed that "women's issues" constituted a top priority on their legislative agendas and understood themselves as representatives of women's interests. But when they began to discuss the issues they championed on behalf of women, these issues were not the "usual suspects." They often mentioned proposed legislation that I would have coded as a "children's issue" or, at times, a "race issue." These legislators articulated a political agenda reflecting crosscutting issues that were not easily codified along a single issue axis. Instead, the legislators articulated their legislative priorities as complex and multifaceted. They saw their legislative priorities affecting constituents across their districts, but they also keenly expressed the impact of these issues on the lives and well-being of women in particular. © Copyright The Women and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2011.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 441
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条