Sustainable prime movers selection for biogas-based combined heat and power for a community microgrid: A hybrid fuzzy multi criteria decision-making approach with consolidated ranking strategies

被引:14
|
作者
Alao, Moshood Akanni [1 ]
Popoola, Olawale Mohammed [1 ]
Ayodele, Temitope Raphael [2 ]
机构
[1] Tshwane Univ Technol, Ctr Energy & Elect Power, Dept Elect Engn, Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Univ Ibadan, Fac Technol, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Ibadan, Nigeria
关键词
Prime movers selection; Fuzzy-CoCoSo; Community microgrid; Combined heat and power; Fuel cells; Borda rule; SYSTEM; OPTIMIZATION; GENERATION; ENTROPY; CCHP; FRAMEWORK; MODEL; AHP;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecmx.2022.100281
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Combined heat and power (CHP) based community microgrid using renewable resources such as biogas is gaining fast prominence in municipalities across the world as a strategy to decarbonise energy sector and brings power supply close to the consumers. But for profitable operation of a CHP system, the selection of suitable prime movers (PMs) is very germane. It has become a significant issue to assess PM alternatives in detail from the investor's or policy maker's view point. Due to varying characteristics of each PM, multi criteria decision making (MCDM) techniques could be efficient tools for selecting optimal PM and making a reasonable decision. In this work, four PMs such as internal combustion engine (ICE), gas turbine (GT), micro-gas turbine (MGT) and fuel cells (FCs) are selected as alternatives with twenty evaluation criteria. The weights of criteria for each PM are evaluated taking a cue from the integration of Fuzzy-Best-Worst (Fuzzy-BWM) and Fuzzy-Entropy methods using fuzzy preference variables. These PMs are ranked using Fuzzy-Combined Compromise Solution (Fuzzy-CoCoSo) on the basis of technical, economic, environmental and social specifications. Thereafter, results based on each weighting preference are merged by using the Borda count and Copeland ranking strategies. The results reveal that initial investment cost in the economic category and footprint in the social category are respectively the most and least significant criteria for PM assessment. It is also revealed that FCs are the most sustainable PM with a compromise score of 2.8053 followed by ICE with a score of 2.5767. The least ranked PM is the MGT with a compromise value of 2.5541. Furthermore, the robustness and reliability of the results are tested by applying a sensitivity analysis and comparative assessment with five existing Fuzzy MCDM methods. This research could be useful to investors and policy makers for the selection of sustainable PM at the planning stage of a biogas-based CHP community microgrid.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 47 条