Patient-Centered Decision-making for Postoperative Narcotic-Free Endocrine Surgery A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:5
|
作者
Zhu, Catherine Y. [1 ]
Schumm, Max A. [1 ]
Hu, Theodore X. [1 ]
Nguyen, Dalena T. [1 ]
Kim, Jiyoon [2 ]
Tseng, Chi-Hong [3 ]
Lin, Anne Y. [1 ]
Yeh, MichaelW. [1 ]
Livhits, Masha J. [1 ]
Wu, James X. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Gen Surg, 10833 Le Conte Ave,72-228 CHS, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
CERVICAL PLEXUS BLOCK; OPIOID USE; PAIN; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1001/jamasurg.2021.4287
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE Historically, opioid pain medications have been overprescribed following thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Many narcotic prescriptions are incompletely consumed, creating waste and opportunities for abuse. OBJECTIVE To determine whether limiting opioid prescriptions after outpatient thyroid and parathyroid surgery to patients who opt in to narcotic treatment reduces opioid consumption without increasing postoperative pain compared with usual care (routine narcotic prescriptions). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A randomized clinical trial of Postoperative Opt-In Narcotic Treatment (POINT) or routine narcotic prescription (control) was conducted at a single tertiary referral center from June 1 to December 30, 2020. A total of 180 adults undergoing ambulatory cervical endocrine surgery, excluding patients currently receiving opioids, were assessed for eligibility. POINT patients received perioperative pain management counseling and were prescribed opioids only on patient request. Patients reported pain scores (0-10) and medication use through 7 daily postoperative surveys. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with opioid consumption. INTERVENTIONS Patients in the POINT group were able to opt in or out of receiving prescriptions for opioid pain medication on discharge. Control patients received routine opioid prescriptions on discharge. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Daily peak pain score through postoperative day 7 was the primary outcome. Noninferiority was defined as a difference less than 2 on an 11-point numeric rating scale from 0 to 10. Analysis was conducted on the evaluable population. RESULTS Of the 180 patients assessed for eligibility, the final study cohort comprised 102 patients: 48 randomized to POINT and 54 to control. Of these, 79 patients (77.5%) were women and median age was 52 (interquartile range, 43-62) years. A total of 550 opioid tablets were prescribed to the control group, and 230 tablets were prescribed to the POINT group, in which 23 patients (47.9%) opted in for an opioid prescription. None who opted out subsequently required rescue opioids. In the first postoperative week, 17 POINT patients (35.4% of survey responders in the POINT group) reported consuming opioids compared with 27 (50.0%) control patients (P=.16). Median peak outpatient pain scores were 6 (interquartile range, 4-8) in the control group vs 6 (interquartile range, 5-7) in the POINT group (P=.71). In multivariate analysis, patients with a history of narcotic use were 7.5 times more likely to opt in (95% CI, 1.61-50.11; P=.02) and 4.8 times more likely to consume opioids (95% CI, 1.04-1.52; P=.01). Higher body mass index (odds ratio, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.01-1.23; P=.03) and highest inpatient postoperative pain score (odds ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.52; P=.02) were also associated with opioid consumption. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, an opt-in strategy for postoperative narcotics reduced opioid prescription without increasing pain after cervical endocrine surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-centered decision-making
    Beach, Mary Catherine
    Callon, Wynne
    Boss, Emily
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2019, 102 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [2] Artificial Intelligence and Patient-Centered Decision-Making
    Bjerring J.C.
    Busch J.
    Philosophy & Technology, 2021, 34 (2) : 349 - 371
  • [3] Patient-centered Shared Decision-making: A Public Imperative
    Coylewright, Megan
    Montori, Victor
    Ting, Henry H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 125 (06): : 545 - 547
  • [4] Incorporating financial toxicity considerations into clinical trial design to facilitate patient-centered decision-making in oncology
    Gharzai, Laila A.
    Jagsi, Reshma
    CANCER, 2023, 129 (08) : 1143 - 1148
  • [5] DECISION-MAKING AND GOAL-SETTING IN A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF PATIENT-CENTERED SUPPORT FOR CHRONIC DISEASE MANAGEMENT
    Kangovi, Shreya
    Mitra, Nandita
    Smith, Robyn A.
    Kulkarni, Raina
    Turr, Lindsey N.
    Huo, Hairong
    Glanz, Karen
    Grande, David
    Long, Judith
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 31 : S173 - S174
  • [6] THE PARADIGM OF PATIENT-CENTERED CARE IN THE PUBLIC HEALTH DECISION-MAKING
    Samarzija, Nikolina Dukic
    Blecich, Andrea Arbula
    Samarzija, Luka
    EKONOMSKA MISAO I PRAKSA-ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND PRACTICE, 2018, 27 (02): : 503 - 516
  • [7] Patient-centered simulation to aid decision-making in hospital management
    Moreno, L
    Aguilar, RM
    Martín, CA
    Piñeiro, JD
    Estévez, JI
    Sigut, JF
    Sánchez, JL
    SIMULATION, 2000, 74 (05) : 290 - 304
  • [8] Patient-centered methadone treatment: a randomized clinical trial
    Schwartz, Robert P.
    Kelly, Sharon M.
    Mitchell, Shannon G.
    Gryczynski, Jan
    O'Grady, Kevin E.
    Gandhi, Devang
    Olsen, Yngvild
    Jaffe, Jerome H.
    ADDICTION, 2017, 112 (03) : 454 - 464
  • [9] Gaps in Patient-Centered Decision-Making Related to Complex Surgery: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Kelly, Elizabeth Palmer
    Rush, Laura J.
    Eramo, Jennifer L.
    Melnyk, Halia L.
    Tarver, Willi L.
    Waterman, Brittany L.
    Gustin, Jillian
    Pawlik, Timothy M.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 295 : 740 - 745
  • [10] A Patient-Centered Decision-Making Algorithm for Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery in Parkinson's Disease
    Joza, S.
    Yen, K.
    Ba, F.
    Miyasaki, J.
    MOVEMENT DISORDERS, 2018, 33 : S250 - S250