Environmental outcomes of the US Renewable Fuel Standard

被引:100
|
作者
Lark, Tyler J. [1 ,2 ]
Hendricks, Nathan P. [3 ]
Smith, Aaron [4 ]
Pates, Nicholas [5 ]
Spawn-Lee, Seth A. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Bougie, Matthew [1 ,2 ]
Booth, Eric G. [7 ,8 ]
Kucharik, Christopher J. [1 ,7 ]
Gibbs, Holly K. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Nelson Inst Environm Studies, Madison, WI 53726 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, US DOE, Great Lakes Bioenergy Res Ctr, Madison, WI 53726 USA
[3] Kansas State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Agr & Resource Econ, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[5] Univ Kentucky, Dept Agr Econ, Lexington, KY 40546 USA
[6] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Geog, Madison, WI 53726 USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Agron, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[8] Univ Wisconsin, Civil & Environm Engn, Madison, WI 53706 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
biofuels; land use change; greenhouse gas emissions; water quality; environmental policy; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LAND-USE CHANGE; HIGHER ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; BIOFUELS; BIOENERGY; WATER; CORN; MITIGATION;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.2101084119
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) specifies the use of biofuels in the United States and thereby guides nearly half of all global biofuel production, yet outcomes of this keystone climate and environmental regulation remain unclear. Here we combine econometric analyses, land use observations, and biophysical models to estimate the realized effects of the RFS in aggregate and down to the scale of individual agricultural fields across the United States. We find that the RFS increased corn prices by 30% and the prices of other crops by 20%, which, in turn, expanded US corn cultivation by 2.8 Mha (8.7%) and total cropland by 2.1 Mha (2.4%) in the years following policy enactment (2008 to 2016). These changes increased annual nationwide fertilizer use by 3 to 8%, increased water quality degradants by 3 to 5%, and caused enough domestic land use change emissions such that the carbon intensity of corn ethanol produced under the RFS is no less than gasoline and likely at least 24% higher. These tradeoffs must be weighed alongside the benefits of biofuels as decision-makers consider the future of renewable energy policies and the potential for fuels like corn ethanol to meet climate mitigation goals.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Linking soy oil demand from the US Renewable Fuel Standard to palm oil expansion through an analysis on vegetable oil price elasticities
    Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano
    Searle, Stephanie
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 127 (19-23) : 19 - 23
  • [42] "The Renewable Fuel Standard in Competitive Equilibrium: Market and Welfare Effects"-Authors' Response to Comment
    Moschini, GianCarlo
    Lapan, Harvey
    Kim, Hyunseok
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 99 (05) : 1146 - 1147
  • [43] Analysis of Environmental Productivity on Fossil Fuel Power Plants in the US
    Lu, Yung-Hsiang
    Chen, Ku-Hsieh
    Cheng, Jen-Chi
    Chen, Chih-Chun
    Li, Sian-Yuan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (24)
  • [44] Climate consequences of low-carbon fuels: The United States Renewable Fuel Standard
    Hill, Jason
    Tajibaeva, Liaila
    Polasky, Stephen
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 97 : 351 - 353
  • [45] POLICY SHOCKS AND MARKET-BASED REGULATIONS: EVIDENCE FROM THE RENEWABLE FUEL STANDARD
    Lade, Gabriel E.
    Lawell, C. -Y. Cynthia Lin
    Smith, Aaron
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2018, 100 (03) : 707 - 731
  • [46] Photoactivated Fuel Cells (PhotoFuelCells). An alternative source of renewable energy with environmental benefits
    Sfaelou, Stavroula
    Lianos, Panagiotis
    [J]. AIMS MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2016, 3 (01) : 270 - 288
  • [47] Simulated impact of the renewable fuels standard on US Conservation Reserve Program enrollment and conversion
    Hellwinckel, Chad
    Clark, Christopher
    Langholtz, Matthew
    Eaton, Laurence
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2016, 8 (01): : 245 - 256
  • [48] Moving China's renewable portfolio standard forward: lessons from the US experiences
    Dai, Anni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORLD ENERGY LAW & BUSINESS, 2022, 15 (05): : 346 - 366
  • [49] Biomass production from the US forest and agriculture sectors in support of a renewable electricity standard
    White, Eric M.
    Latta, Greg
    Alig, Ralph J.
    Skog, Kenneth E.
    Adams, Darius M.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 58 : 64 - 74
  • [50] Financial outcomes of environmental risk and opportunity for US companies
    Semenova, Natalia
    Hassell, Lars G.
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 16 (03) : 195 - 212