Analysis of air quality and health co-benefits regarding electric vehicle promotion coupled with power plant emissions

被引:44
|
作者
Lin, Wen-Yinn [1 ]
Hsiao, Min-Chuan [1 ]
Wu, Pei-Chih [2 ]
Fu, Joshua S. [3 ]
Lai, Li-Wei [4 ]
Lai, Hsin-Chih [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Inst Environm Engn & Management, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Chang Jung Christian Univ, Dept Green Energy & Environm Resources, Tainan, Taiwan
[3] Univ Tennessee, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Knoxville, TN USA
[4] Chang Jung Christian Univ, Environm Res & Informat Ctr, Tainan, Taiwan
关键词
PM2.5; Electric vehicle; Power plants; Health benefits; WRF; CMAQ; LONG-TERM EXPOSURE; PARTICULATE MATTER; POTENTIAL IMPACTS; ANALYSIS PROGRAM; RANGE TRANSPORT; ROAD TRANSPORT; POLLUTION; PM2.5; MORTALITY; TAIWAN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119152
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Purpose of this study is to discuss the electric vehicle policy's effects on air pollution reduction in Taiwan. Since PM2.5 is one of Taiwan's major air-pollution issues, Environmental Protection Administration of Taiwan (TEPA) promoted a policy that the sale of cars powered by fossil fuels would be banned in 2040, which means all the pollutants emitted by petrol-engine vehicles will be reduced. But at the same time the electric vehicles require additional power consumption, therefore, it is important to investigate the effect of air quality and health benefit when mobile emission reduces but power plant emission increases. To evaluate this clean air policy, Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) - Community Multi-scale Air Quality model (CMAQ) and Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program (BenMAP) were applied in scenarios discussion. The location of power plants to generate additional electric power and the seasonal variation were adapted in scenarios for considering the atmospheric transportation effects. The results showed if additional power supply was generated in northern, central, or southern Taiwan, the average annual PM2.5 concentration would be reduced by 2.88, 2.90, and 2.92 mu g/m(3), respectively. The associated health benefits would be 43.35 billion, 43.40 billion, and 43.54 billion USD. This evaluation presents adopting electric vehicles would improve the air quality of Taiwan significantly. The analysis of seasonal scenarios also indicates the location to generate additional electric power is important when adopting electric vehicles policy. The prevailing wind of different season will transport the air pollutant to diverse downwind area. The additional electricity demand generated by northern power plants in summer and autumn but switched to southern power plants in spring and winter would reduce 2.95 mu g/m(3) PM2.5 and lead to the best air quality and health benefits across Taiwan among the considered options. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] US power plant carbon standards and clean air and health co-benefits
    Driscoll, Charles T.
    Buonocore, Jonathan J.
    Levy, Jonathan I.
    Lambert, Kathleen F.
    Burtraw, Dallas
    Reid, Stephen B.
    Fakhraei, Habibollah
    Schwartz, Joel
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2015, 5 (06) : 535 - 540
  • [2] US power plant carbon standards and clean air and health co-benefits
    Charles T. Driscoll
    Jonathan J. Buonocore
    Jonathan I. Levy
    Kathleen F. Lambert
    Dallas Burtraw
    Stephen B. Reid
    Habibollah Fakhraei
    Joel Schwartz
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2015, 5 : 535 - 540
  • [3] Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health
    J. Jason West
    Steven J. Smith
    Raquel A. Silva
    Vaishali Naik
    Yuqiang Zhang
    Zachariah Adelman
    Meridith M. Fry
    Susan Anenberg
    Larry W. Horowitz
    Jean-Francois Lamarque
    [J]. Nature Climate Change, 2013, 3 : 885 - 889
  • [4] Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health
    West, J. Jason
    Smith, Steven J.
    Silva, Raquel A.
    Naik, Vaishali
    Zhang, Yuqiang
    Adelman, Zachariah
    Fry, Meridith M.
    Anenberg, Susan
    Horowitz, Larry W.
    Lamarque, Jean-Francois
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2013, 3 (10) : 885 - 889
  • [5] Co-benefits of peaking carbon dioxide emissions on air quality and health, a case of Guangzhou, China
    Wu, Pengcheng
    Guo, Fang
    Cai, Bofeng
    Wang, Can
    Lv, Chen
    Liu, Hui
    Huang, Jizhang
    Huang, Ying
    Cao, Libin
    Pang, Lingyun
    Gao, Ji
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 282
  • [6] California's early transition to electric vehicles: Observed health and air quality co-benefits
    Garcia, Erika
    Johnston, Jill
    McConnell, Rob
    Palinkas, Lawrence
    Eckel, Sandrah P.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 867
  • [7] Air quality and health co-benefits of China's carbon dioxide emissions peaking before 2030
    Tang, Rong
    Zhao, Jing
    Liu, Yifan
    Huang, Xin
    Zhang, Yanxu
    Zhou, Derong
    Ding, Aijun
    Nielsen, Chris P.
    Wang, Haikun
    [J]. NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)
  • [8] Air quality and health co-benefits of China’s carbon dioxide emissions peaking before 2030
    Rong Tang
    Jing Zhao
    Yifan Liu
    Xin Huang
    Yanxu Zhang
    Derong Zhou
    Aijun Ding
    Chris P. Nielsen
    Haikun Wang
    [J]. Nature Communications, 13
  • [9] Analysis of Air Quality and Health Co-Benefits under Low Carbon Pathway in Taiwan
    Lai, Hsin-Chih
    Chung, Shih-Ming
    Li, Li-Ling
    Lin, Wen-Yinn
    Hsiao, Min-Chuan
    [J]. AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (07)
  • [10] Quantifying air quality co-benefits to industrial decarbonization: the local Air Emissions Tracking Atlas
    Jordan, Amy B.
    Rodriguez, Daniel S.
    Bennett, Jeffrey A.
    Sale, Kat
    Gilhooley, Christopher
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12