Accuracy of fibula reconstruction using patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates and dental implants: A new modality for functional reconstruction of mandibular defects

被引:103
|
作者
Schepers, Rutger H. [1 ]
Raghoebar, Gerry M. [1 ]
Vissink, Arjan [1 ]
Stenekes, Martin W. [2 ]
Kraeima, Joep [1 ,3 ]
Roodenburg, Jan L. [1 ]
Reintsema, Harry [1 ]
Witjes, Max J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Plast Surg, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Twente, MIRA Inst Biomed Technol & Tech Med, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
关键词
3D; Fibula; Implants; Mandible; Plates; Reconstruction; COMPUTER-AIDED-DESIGN; FLAP RECONSTRUCTION; OUTCOMES; REHABILITATION; PLACEMENT; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcms.2015.03.015
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to analyze the accuracy of mandibular reconstruction using patient-specific computer-aided designed and computer-aided manufactured (CAD/CAM) reconstruction plates as a guide to place fibula grafts and dental implants in a one-stage procedure using pre-operative 3D virtual planning. Methods: Seven consecutive patients were analyzed retrospectively, the 3D accuracy of placement of the fibula grafts and dental implants was compared to the virtual plan. Results: Six out of seven flaps survived for an average follow-up time of 9.4 months. The outcome was compared to the virtual plan, superimposed on the mandible. For the fibula segments, the mean deviation (SD) was 3.0 (1.8) min and the mean angulation (SD) was 4.2 degrees (3.2 degrees). For the implants, the mean deviation (SD) was 3.3 (13) mm and the mean angulation (SD) was 13.0 degrees (6.7 degrees). The mean (SD) mandibular resection plane deviation was 1.8 (0.9) mm. Conclusions: A patient-specific reconstruction plate is a valuable tool in the reconstruction of mandibular defects with fibula grafts and dental implants. Implant angulation showed a greater deviation from the virtual plans in patients with a sharp ventral fibula rim, where the guide is removed after pilot drilling of the implants. (C) 2015 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 657
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-Specific Mandibular Reconstruction Plates Increase Accuracy and Long-Term Stability in Immediate Alloplastic Reconstruction of Segmental Mandibular Defects (vol 19, pg 609, 2020)
    Zeller, A. N.
    Neuhaus, M. T.
    Weissbach, L. V. M.
    Rana, M.
    Dhawan, A.
    Eckstein, F. M.
    Gellrich, N. C.
    Zimmerer, R. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2022, 21 (04): : 1096 - 1096
  • [22] Patient-specific miniplates versus patient-specific reconstruction plate: A biomechanical comparison with 3D-printed plates in mandibular reconstruction
    Steffen, Claudius
    Sellenschloh, Kay
    Willsch, Magdalena
    Soares, Ana Prates
    Morlock, Michael M.
    Heiland, Max
    Kreutzer, Kilian
    Huber, Gerd
    Rendenbach, Carsten
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2023, 140
  • [23] Increasing the accuracy of mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps using functionalized selective laser-melted patient-specific implants: A retrospective multicenter analysis
    Rana, Majeed
    Chin, Shih-Jan
    Muecke, Thomas
    Kesting, Marco
    Groebe, Alexander
    Riecke, Bjoern
    Heiland, Max
    Gellrich, Nils-Claudius
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 45 (08) : 1212 - 1219
  • [24] Mandibular reconstruction with fibula osteoseptocutaneous free flap and osseointegrated dental implants
    Kildal, M
    Wei, FC
    Chang, YM
    Chen, HC
    Chang, MH
    [J]. CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2001, 28 (02) : 403 - +
  • [25] CAD/CAM titanium implants for reconstruction of cranial and craniofacial defects
    Scholz, M
    Eufinger, H
    Wehmoller, M
    Heuser, L
    [J]. ZENTRALBLATT FUR NEUROCHIRURGIE, 1997, 58 (03): : 105 - 110
  • [26] The Use of Patient-Specific Orbital Reconstruction Implants During Maxillectomy Reconstruction
    Desai, Dipan P. D.
    Alwani, Mohamedkazim
    Sheen, Derek
    Narayanan, Ajay
    Gordin, Eli
    [J]. FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY & AESTHETIC MEDICINE, 2023, 25 (05) : 403 - 408
  • [27] "One-piece" patient-specific reconstruction plate for double-barrel fibula-based mandibular reconstruction
    Yang, W. F.
    Choi, W. S.
    Zhu, W. Y.
    Su, Y. X.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 49 (08) : 1016 - 1019
  • [28] Patient-specific reconstruction plates are the missing link in computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction: A showcase for technical description
    Cornelius, Carl-Peter
    Smolka, Wenko
    Giessler, Goetz A.
    Wilde, Frank
    Probst, Florian A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 43 (05) : 624 - 629
  • [29] Three-dimensional accuracy of mandibular reconstruction by patient-specific pre-bent reconstruction plates using an "in-house" 3D-printer
    Naros, Andreas
    Weise, Hannes
    Tilsen, Felix
    Hoefert, Sebastian
    Naros, Georgios
    Krimmel, Michael
    Reinert, Siegmar
    Polligkeit, Joachim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 46 (09) : 1645 - 1651
  • [30] Patient-Specific Implants for Reconstruction and Functional Rehabilitation: the New Era of Management—a Case Report
    Joseph Edward
    Arjun Madhu Usha
    Roopesh U. Nair
    Neethu Kumaran Geetha
    [J]. Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2023, 22 : 161 - 164