Assessment of Precipitation Simulations in Central Asia by CMIP5 Climate Models

被引:33
|
作者
Ta, Zhijie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yu, Yang [1 ,3 ]
Sun, Lingxiao [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Xi [1 ,3 ]
Mu, Guijin [1 ,3 ]
Yu, Ruide [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Xinjiang Inst Ecol & Geog, State Key Lab Desert & Oasis Ecol, Urumqi 830011, Peoples R China
[2] Xinjiang Univ, Coll Resource & Environm Sci, Urumqi 830046, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Xinjiang Inst Ecol & Geog, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
关键词
CMIP5; precipitation; performance evaluation; Central Asia; ABSOLUTE ERROR MAE; RIVER-BASIN; TEMPERATURE; PERFORMANCE; RAINFALL; CHINA; RESOLUTION; EXTREMES; BIASES; RMSE;
D O I
10.3390/w10111516
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) provides data, which is widely used to assess global and regional climate change. In this study, we evaluated the ability of 37 global climate models (GCMs) of CMIP5 to simulate historical precipitation in Central Asia (CA). The relative root mean square error (RRMSE), spatial correlation coefficient, and Kling-Gupta efficiency (KGE) were used as criteria for evaluation. The precipitation simulation results of GCMs were compared with the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) precipitation in 1986-2005. Most models show a variety of precipitation simulation capabilities both spatially and temporally, whereas the top six models were identified as having good performance in CA, including HadCM3, MIROC5, MPI-ESM-LR, MPI-ESM-P, CMCC-CM, and CMCC-CMS. As the GCMs have large uncertainties in the prediction of future precipitation, it is difficult to find the best model to predict future precipitation in CA. Multi-Model Ensemble (MME) results can give a good simulation of precipitation, and are superior to individual models.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Sea Level Response to External Forcings in Historical Simulations of CMIP5 Climate Models
    Slangen, Aimee B. A.
    Church, John A.
    Zhang, Xuebin
    Monselesan, Didier P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2015, 28 (21) : 8521 - 8539
  • [42] Assessment of the Atlantic water layer in the Arctic Ocean in CMIP5 climate models
    Qi Shu
    Qiang Wang
    Jie Su
    Xiang Li
    Fangli Qiao
    [J]. Climate Dynamics, 2019, 53 : 5279 - 5291
  • [43] Assessment of Historical Climate Trends of Surface Air Temperature in CMIP5 Models
    FENG Xiao-Li
    ZHI Hai
    LIN Peng-Fei
    LIU Hai-Long
    [J]. Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters, 2014, 7 (02) : 137 - 142
  • [44] Comparison of precipitation projections of CMIP5 and CMIP6 global climate models over Yulin, China
    Shiru, Mohammed Sanusi
    Chung, Eun-Sung
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    Wang, Xiao-jun
    [J]. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 147 (1-2) : 535 - 548
  • [45] Comparison of precipitation projections of CMIP5 and CMIP6 global climate models over Yulin, China
    Mohammed Sanusi Shiru
    Eun-Sung Chung
    Shamsuddin Shahid
    Xiao-jun Wang
    [J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2022, 147 : 535 - 548
  • [46] Assessment of Red Sea temperatures in CMIP5 models for present and future climate
    Agulles, Miguel
    Jorda, Gabriel
    Hoteit, Ibrahim
    Agusti, Susana
    Duarte, Carlos M.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (07):
  • [47] Assessment of the Atlantic water layer in the Arctic Ocean in CMIP5 climate models
    Shu, Qi
    Wang, Qiang
    Su, Jie
    Li, Xiang
    Qiao, Fangli
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2019, 53 (9-10) : 5279 - 5291
  • [48] Evaluating wind extremes in CMIP5 climate models
    Devashish Kumar
    Vimal Mishra
    Auroop R. Ganguly
    [J]. Climate Dynamics, 2015, 45 : 441 - 453
  • [49] Evaluating wind extremes in CMIP5 climate models
    Kumar, Devashish
    Mishra, Vimal
    Ganguly, Auroop R.
    [J]. CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2015, 45 (1-2) : 441 - 453
  • [50] Comparison of Dryland Climate Change in Observations and CMIP5 Simulations
    JI Mingxia
    HUANG Jianping
    XIE Yongkun
    LIU Jun
    [J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2015, 32 (11) : 1565 - 1574