Secretory response to cholera toxin in the porcine jejunum under different types of general anaesthesia

被引:4
|
作者
Maltbaek, JS
Grondahl, ML
Berggreen, P
Nielsen, CG
Thorboll, JE
Skadhauge, E
Hansen, MB
机构
[1] Royal Vet & Agr Univ, Dept Anat & Physiol, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[2] Royal Vet & Agr Univ, Dept Clin Studies, DK-1870 Frederiksberg, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1113/expphysiol.1998.sp004135
中图分类号
Q4 [生理学];
学科分类号
071003 ;
摘要
Investigations of intestinal secretion are often performed under anaesthesia. This study evaluates the influence of anaesthetic agents on the intestinal secretion induced by cholera toxin (CT) in the pig. CT was instilled for 4h in ligated jejunal loops under anaesthesia with halothane, saffan, cr-chloralose, or propofol. Cardiovascular parameters, blood gas data, plasma cortisol levels, net fluid accumulation, intraluminal mediators (serotonin (5-HT), prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)) and electrolyte concentrations in the accumulated fluid were determined. The systolic blood pressure and heart rate was highest for saffan-anaesthetized pigs (blood pressure: saffan > alpha-chloralose > propofol = halothane; heart rate: saffan > alpha-chloralose = propofol = halothane), while blood gases and cortisol levels were within the same range. CT induced a dose-dependent fluid accumulation under all four anaesthetics. The fluid accumulation was significantly higher in pigs treated with saffan, alpha-chloralose and propofol than in halothane-treated pigs (saffan = alpha-chloralose > propofol > halothane). There was no significant difference in electrolyte concentrations in the accumulated fluid or in the luminal content of 5-HT and PGE(2) between anaesthetics. The results demonstrate that anaesthetic agents profoundly influence the secretory response in the small intestine and indicate the importance of the choice of anaesthetic in this type of experiment.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 531
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Different intradermal skin testing response to atracurium and cisatracurium after an anaphylactoid reaction during general anaesthesia
    Soetens, F
    Smolders, F
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2002, 30 (05) : 699 - 699
  • [32] HAEMODYNAMIC RESPONSE TO NASOTRACHEAL INTUBATION UNDER GENERAL ANAESTHESIA: COMPARISON BETWEEN FIBEROPTIC BRONCHOSCOPY AND DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY
    Bhavar, Tushar
    Punia, T. S.
    Bhupal, J. P. S.
    Babrah, Harpreet
    Bagri, Banreet
    Singla, Abhishek
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2013, 2 (04): : 833 - 839
  • [33] Urban flooding response to rainstorm scenarios under different return period types
    Zhang, Hang
    Zhang, Jinping
    Fang, Hongyuan
    Yang, Feng
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2022, 87
  • [34] Response and effect - different reasons for classifying plant functional types under grazing
    Landsberg, J
    [J]. PEOPLE AND RANGELANDS BUILDING THE FUTURE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1999, : 911 - 915
  • [35] DIFFERENT RESPONSE OF ENU-EXPOSED AND UNEXPOSED RAT-BRAIN CELLS TO CHOLERA-TOXIN AT EARLY PASSAGES IN CULTURE
    CLAISSE, PJ
    ROSCOE, JP
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1981, 43 (02) : 240 - 244
  • [36] COMPARISON OF SURGICAL STRESS RESPONSE UNDER GENERAL ANAESTHESIA IN OPEN LAPAROTOMY VS. LAPAROSCOPIC ABDOMINAL SURGERIES
    Narra, Gopal Reddy
    Manohar, S.
    Aparna
    Miraz
    Santhosh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (87): : 15125 - 15133
  • [37] Response of the TDR sensor to moisture under different types of management of a typical Latosol in the Cerrado
    Guimaraes, Claudinei Martins
    Gomes Costa, Carlos Alexandre
    Carneiro, Leandro Flavio
    da Assuncao, Hildeu Ferreira
    [J]. REVISTA CIENCIA AGRONOMICA, 2019, 50 (01): : 1 - 7
  • [38] STUDY DIFFERENT CORE TYPES OF SANDWICH PLATE ON THE DYNAMIC RESPONSE UNDER IMPACT LOADING
    Hwalah, Safaa Mohammed
    Obeid, Hatem Hadi
    Fadhel, Essam Zuheir
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 15 (04): : 2764 - 2780
  • [39] Dynamic Response Characteristics of a Sealing Airbag under Different Impact Types and Impact Pressures
    Ma, Li
    Liu, Shangming
    Wei, Gaoming
    Guo, Ying
    [J]. ACS OMEGA, 2022, : 38589 - 38599
  • [40] RESPONSE OF RICE TO DIFFERENT TYPES OF ZINCATED-P FERTILIZERS UNDER SUBMERGED CONDITIONS
    SINGH, CP
    DANG, YP
    RUHAL, DS
    [J]. TROPICAL AGRICULTURE, 1985, 62 (04): : 310 - 312