Efficacy and safety of etanercept in the treatment of sciatica: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:4
|
作者
Jing, Shangfei [1 ]
Yang, Chenyuan [2 ]
Zhang, Xiaofei [2 ]
Wen, Shuzheng [1 ]
Li, Yuankui [3 ]
机构
[1] Inner Mongolia Med Univ, Dept Orthopaed, Affiliated Hosp 2, Hohhot 010010, Peoples R China
[2] Inner Mongolia Med Univ, Radiol Dept, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Hohhot 010010, Peoples R China
[3] Inner Mongolia Med Univ, Tradit Chinese Med Inst, Hohhot 010010, Peoples R China
关键词
Etanercept; Sciatica; Lumbar disc herniation; Spinal stenosis; Meta-analysis; NECROSIS-FACTOR-ALPHA; TRANSFORAMINAL EPIDURAL ETANERCEPT; HERNIATION-INDUCED SCIATICA; LOW-BACK-PAIN; DISC HERNIATION; DOUBLE-BLIND; SPINAL STENOSIS; DOSE-RESPONSE; CAUDA-EQUINA; COMPRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.054
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Etanercept might be promising to alleviate sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis. However, the results remained controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of etanercept in patients with sciatica. PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Controlled clinical trials (CCT) assessing the efficacy of etanercept on sciatica caused by lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis were included. Two investigators independently searched articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. The primary outcome was leg pain scores. Meta analysis was performed using random-effect model. Four RCTs and one CCT involving 184 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with placebo, etanercept could significantly reduce leg pain (Std. mean difference = -0.83; 95% CI = -1.59 to -0.06; P = 0.03) and back pain (Std. mean difference = -1.89; 95% CI = -3.34 to -0.43; P = 0.01). However, when comparing etanercept to steroids there was no significant difference in the relief of leg pain (Std. mean difference = -1.18; 95% CI = -3.21 to 0.84; P = 0.25) and back pain (Std. mean difference = -0.29; 95% CI = -1.26 to 0.67; P = 0.55). Etanercept showed no increase in Oswestry Disability Index (001) compared with placebo (Std. mean difference = -0.83; 95% CI = -2.03 to 0.37; P = 0.18) and steroids (Std. mean difference = -0.19; 95% CI = -1.15 to 0.77; P = 0.70). Etanercept treatment was associated with a significantly reduced pain in leg and back compared to placebo and may possibly improve leg pain relief compared to steroids, but failed to improve ODI. Etanercept should be recommended for sciatica with caution because of heterogeneity. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 74
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy and safety of zuranolone for the treatment of depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Zejun
    Wu, Qiuxia
    Peng, Pu
    Wu, Min
    Liu, Shouhuan
    Liu, Tieqiao
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2024, 331
  • [22] Efficacy and safety of warm acupuncture combined with Western medicine for sciatica: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guo, Lingling
    Li, Liang
    Li, Xiuli
    Li, Linghan
    Zhang, Lijin
    Zhang, Haixia
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (01) : E32543
  • [23] Etanercept in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Ya-Fei
    Dong, Hui
    Tu, Sheno-Hao
    Zheng, Cui-Hong
    Liu, Pei-Lin
    Hu, Yong-Hong
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2014, 8 (05) : 1585 - 1592
  • [24] Therapeutic effect and safety of Tuina on sciatica A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis*
    Yan, Huixin
    An, Yun
    Zhang, Tao
    Zhao, Jiangna
    Yan, Juntao
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (48)
  • [25] Efficacy and safety of tigecycline: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yahav, Dafna
    Lador, Adi
    Paul, Mical
    Leibovici, Leonard
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2011, 66 (09) : 1963 - 1971
  • [26] Efficacy and safety of seprafilm: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohri, Yasuhiko
    Kusunoki, Masato
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 32 (08) : 1886 - 1887
  • [27] Efficacy and safety of bromelain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Leelakanok, Nattawut
    Petchsomrit, Arpa
    Janurai, Thitapa
    Saechan, Charinrat
    Sunsandee, Niti
    NUTRITION AND HEALTH, 2023, 29 (03) : 479 - 503
  • [28] Efficacy and safety of cefepime: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yahav, Dafna
    Paul, Mical
    Fraser, Abigail
    Sarid, Nadav
    Leibovici, Leonard
    LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2007, 7 (05): : 338 - 348
  • [29] Efficacy and Safety of Seprafilm: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yasuhiko Mohri
    Masato Kusunoki
    World Journal of Surgery, 2008, 32 : 1886 - 1887
  • [30] Efficacy and safety of daptomycin: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Teresa Rosanova, Maria
    Bes, David
    Serrano-Aguilar, Pedro
    Sberna, Norma
    Herrera-Ramos, Estefania
    Luis Lede, Roberto
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2019, 6