Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging of Cerebral Gliomas: Evaluating Fractional Anisotropy Characteristics

被引:46
|
作者
White, M. L. [1 ]
Zhang, Y. [1 ]
Yu, F. [2 ]
Kazmi, S. A. Jaffar [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Biostat, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
关键词
WHITE-MATTER; LOW-GRADE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DENSITY; TUMORS; CLASSIFICATION; TRACTS;
D O I
10.3174/ajnr.A2267
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: FA correlation to glioma tumor grade has been mixed if not disappointing. There are several potential underlying fundamental issues that have contributed to these results. In an attempt to overcome these past shortfalls, we evaluated characteristics of FA of the solid tissue components of gliomas, including whether high-grade gliomas have a greater variation of FA than low-grade gliomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with gliomas (9 grade II, 8 grade III, and 17 grade IV) underwent diffusion tensor imaging at 3T. Mean FA, maximum FA, and minimum FA values were measured within the solid tissue components of the tumors. The variations of FA were evaluated by determining the range of FA values and the maximum SDs of FA. The variations of FA values among different tumor grades were compared statistically. We also correlated FA variations with minimum FA and maximum FA. RESULTS: The maximum FA, FA range, and maximum SD for grade II tumors were significantly lower than those for grade III and IV tumors (P < .0001 similar to P = .0164). A very good correlation of maximum FA to FA range (r = 0.931) and maximum SD (r = 0.889) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The FA range and maximum SD appear useful for differentiating low- and high-grade gliomas. This analysis added value to the findings on conventional MR imaging. In addition, focal maximum FA is a key factor contributing to the larger FA variation within high-grade gliomas.
引用
收藏
页码:374 / 381
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Study of MR diffusion tensor imaging and the
    Zhou Hongyu
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2013, 19 (05) : 667 - 667
  • [42] Diffusion tensor brain MR imaging in X-linked cerebral adrenoleukodystrophy
    Ito, R
    Melhem, ER
    Mori, S
    Eichler, FS
    Raymond, GV
    Moser, HW
    NEUROLOGY, 2001, 56 (04) : 544 - 547
  • [44] Anisotropic fractional diffusion tensor imaging
    Meerschaert, Mark M.
    Magin, Richard L.
    Ye, Allen Q.
    JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND CONTROL, 2016, 22 (09) : 2211 - 2221
  • [45] Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Colored Fractional Anisotropy Mapping of the Ventralis Intermedius Nucleus of the Thalamus
    Sedrak, Mark
    Gorgulho, Alessandra
    Frew, Andrew
    Behnke, Eric
    DeSalles, Antonio
    Pouratian, Nader
    NEUROSURGERY, 2011, 69 (05) : 1124 - 1129
  • [46] Fractional Anisotropy Levels Derived From Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Cervical Syringomyelia COMMENT
    Benzel, Edward C.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 67 (04) : 905 - 905
  • [47] Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Heterotopia: Changes of Fractional Anisotropy during Radial Migration of Neurons
    Lee, Seung-Koo
    Kim, Jinna
    YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 51 (04) : 590 - 593
  • [48] Diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy and tissue cellularity
    Jiang, Ruisheng
    Ma, Zhijun
    Dong, Haixia
    Sun, Shihang
    Zeng, Xiangmin
    Li, Xiao
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 89 (1064):
  • [49] Carpal tunnel syndrome assessment with diffusion tensor imaging: Value of fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient
    A. S. Klauser
    M. Abd Ellah
    C. Kremser
    M. Taljanovic
    G. Schmidle
    M. Gabl
    F. Cartes-Zumelzu
    R. Steiger
    E. R. Gizewski
    European Radiology, 2018, 28 : 1111 - 1117
  • [50] A Validation Study of Multicenter Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Reliability of Fractional Anisotropy and Diffusivity Values
    Fox, R. J.
    Sakaie, K.
    Lee, J-C.
    Debbins, J. P.
    Liu, Y.
    Arnold, D. L.
    Melhem, E. R.
    Smith, C. H.
    Philips, M. D.
    Lowe, M.
    Fisher, E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2012, 33 (04) : 695 - 700