Social interaction and agency in self-organizing student teams during their transition from face-to-face to online learning

被引:36
|
作者
Sjolie, Ela [1 ]
Espenes, Thomas Christian [2 ]
Buo, Ruth [3 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Ind Econ & Technol Management, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Univ South Eastern Norway, USN Sch Business, Dept Business & IT, Campus Bo,POB 235, N-3603 Kongsberg, Norway
[3] Norwegian Directorate Higher Educ & Skills, Postboks 1093, N-5809 Bergen, Norway
关键词
Project -based learning; Virtual teams; Computer -supported collaborative learning; Social interaction; Sociability; INTERDEPENDENCE; SOCIABILITY; REFLECTION; EDUCATION; TEAMWORK; MEMBERS; WORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104580
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Online collaboration is becoming increasingly more common in work life and education, a development that is accentuated by the Covid-19 pandemic. It is thus imperative that students learn to work in and as teams in online settings, and that teachers and educational researchers and policymakers understand how online environments enable and constrain student collabora-tion. However, what has been missing in research on online student collaboration is a focus on students as agents rather than passive learners as well as a lack of focus on student teams as self -organizing teams. This paper reports on a study that investigated the experiences of 1611 graduate students in 315 teams enrolled in an interdisciplinary project-based course during their (forced) transition from face-to-face to online collaboration due to the COVID-19 pandemic. We explored how the transition to online learning affected social interaction and how teams changed their practices to support and sustain social interaction in the online environment. The findings show that the changed conditions of the learning environment influenced social interaction in negative ways, but also that team reflection seemed to enable the students to reverse some of the adverse effects and develop practices that supported both the cognitive and socio-emotional dimensions of social interaction. Theoretically, this study suggests possible causes for why social interaction was reduced and provides in-depth knowledge about the relationships between social interaction, social presence, and social space. The study also provides support for theories of learning that emphasize the need to consider students as active agents rather than merely users of the affor-dances of a virtual learning environment or guided by the teacher's interventions. It makes a unique contribution to the scarce empirical literature on virtual self-organizing student teams in higher education and provides practical implications for teachers and educational researchers and policy makers.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Examining the effect of learning environment on student behaviour through comparison of face-to-face and online design studio
    Dogan Dervisoglu, Ceren
    Yilmaz, Ebru
    MEGARON, 2023, 18 (02): : 142 - 157
  • [42] Online learning strategies to recruit and train Student Mentors: Opportunities for development and integration with face-to-face strategies
    Garcia-Melgar, Ana
    JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LANGUAGE AND LEARNING, 2018, 12 (01): : A1 - A14
  • [43] Determining the differences between online and face-to-face student-group interactions in a blended learning course
    Shu, Hang
    Gu, Xiaoqing
    INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 39 : 13 - 21
  • [44] A course is a course is a course: Factor invariance in student evaluation of online, blended and face-to-face learning environments
    Dziuban, Charles
    Moskal, Patsy
    INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 14 (04): : 236 - 241
  • [45] Alienation Among College Students and Attitudes Toward Face-to-Face and Online Counseling: Implications for Student Learning
    Lewis, Jacqueline
    Coursol, Diane H.
    Bremer, Karin Lindstrom
    Komarenko, Oleksandr
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE EDUCATION AND PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 14 (01): : 28 - 37
  • [46] Gains from the transition from face-to-face to digital/online modality to improve education in emergency
    Camacho-Zuniga, Claudia
    Pena-Becerril, Maritza
    Cuevas-Cancino, Maria de la O.
    Aviles-Rabanales, Erendira Gabriela
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2023, 8
  • [47] Students' perceptions of teaching and social presence: A comparative analysis of face-to-face and online learning environments
    Bowers, James
    Kumar, Poonam
    International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 2015, 10 (01) : 27 - 44
  • [48] Live face-to-face interaction during fMRI: A new tool for social cognitive neuroscience
    Redcay, Elizabeth
    Dodell-Feder, David
    Pearrow, Mark J.
    Mavros, Penelope L.
    Kleiner, Mario
    Gabrieli, John D. E.
    Saxe, Rebecca
    NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 50 (04) : 1639 - 1647
  • [49] Face-to-face, online or HyFlex instruction? The effects of self-directed learning on stress reduction and student satisfaction among emerging adults
    Choi, Soochan
    Li, Zhen
    Boonme, Kittipong
    Ren, He
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION IN BUSINESS, 2024, 17 (03) : 373 - 394
  • [50] Comparing instructor and student perspectives of online versus face-to-face education for program factors during the pandemic
    Fish, Lynn A.
    Snodgrass, Coral R.
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATION FOR BUSINESS, 2023, 98 (08) : 452 - 461