Comparison of self-propulsion performance between vessels with single-screw propulsion and hybrid contra-rotating podded propulsion

被引:9
|
作者
Wang, Zhan-zhi [1 ]
Min, Shao-song [1 ]
Peng, Fei [1 ]
Shen, Xing-rong [2 ]
机构
[1] Naval Univ Engn, Dept Naval Architecture & Ocean Engn, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Marine Design & Res Inst China, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hybrid CRP podded Propulsion system; Self-propulsion performance; Numerical calculation; Thrust deduction fraction; Effective wake fraction; HYDRODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109095
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
The present work compares the self-propulsion performance between vessels with single-screw propulsion and hybrid contra-rotating podded propulsion. The viscous flow fields of 4000 TEU container vessels with single-screw, single-rudder propulsion and hybrid contra-rotating propeller (CRP) podded propulsion systems were solved numerically by the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations (RANS), the shear stress transport (SST) k. turbulence model, and the sliding mesh method. Numerical uncertainty analysis of the resistance and selfpropulsion factor were employed according to ITTC Quality Manual 7.5-03-01-01. Self-propulsion factor, viscous flow field, and pressure distribution at the stern of the vessels were analyzed in detail. Numerical results suggested that the vessel with the hybrid CRP podded propulsion showed a 17.59% larger effective wake fraction, a 40.2% smaller thrust deduction fraction, a 15.1% higher hull efficiency, and a 4.12% higher overall propulsive efficiency compared with the single-screw vessel. In addition, the vessel with the hybrid CRP podded propulsion showed a basically symmetric, smaller velocity gradient and more uniform flow field at the stern, resulting in a much smaller propeller-induced fluctuating pressure on the hull, compared with the single-screw vessel. In conclusion, the hybrid CRP podded propulsion system exhibited high efficiency and low vibration levels.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Penalty of hull and propeller fouling on ship self-propulsion performance
    Song, Soonseok
    Demirel, Yigit Kemal
    Atlar, Mehmet
    APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH, 2020, 94
  • [22] Bollard Pull and Self-Propulsion Performance of a Waterjet Propelled Tracked Amphibian
    Kim, Taehyung
    Yoon, Donghyeon
    Seo, Jeongil
    Wang, Jihyeun
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 12 (10)
  • [23] Active Brownian information engine: Self-propulsion induced colossal performance
    Rafeek, Rafna
    Mondal, Debasish
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 161 (12):
  • [24] Research on a Strategy for Prediction Methods of Submarine Self-Propulsion Hydrodynamic Performance
    Xu, Pei
    Guo, Yingchun
    Zhang, Yin
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (20):
  • [25] Self-propulsion performance predictions of AUV based on response surface methodology
    Liu, Jixin
    Yu, Fei
    Yan, Tianhong
    He, Bo
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2023, 287
  • [26] Numerical Simulation of the Hydrodynamic Performance and Self-Propulsion of a UUV near the Seabed
    Liu, Xiaodong
    Hu, Yuli
    Mao, Zhaoyong
    Tian, Wenlong
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (14):
  • [27] Hydrodynamic Analysis of Self-Propulsion Performance of Wave-Driven Catamaran
    Zhang, Weixin
    Li, Ye
    Liao, Yulei
    Jia, Qi
    Pan, Kaiwen
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 9 (11)
  • [28] Self-propulsion of Leidenfrost Drops between Non-Parallel Structures
    Cheng Luo
    Manjarik Mrinal
    Xiang Wang
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [29] Self-propulsion of Leidenfrost Drops between Non-Parallel Structures
    Luo, Cheng
    Mrinal, Manjarik
    Wang, Xiang
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [30] Hydrodynamic Shape Design and Self-Propulsion Analysis of a Hybrid-Driven AUG
    Chen, Chen-Wei
    Zhou, Zhao-Ye
    Chen, Xu-Peng
    Zhou, Xiao-Jing
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 11 (04)