Greater sage-grouse winter habitat selection and energy development

被引:160
|
作者
Doherty, Kevin E. [1 ]
Naugle, David E. [1 ]
Walker, Brett L. [1 ]
Graham, Jon M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montana, Wildlife Biol Program, Coll Forestry & Conservat, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[2] Univ Montana, Dept Math Sci, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT | 2008年 / 72卷 / 01期
关键词
Centrocercus urophasianus; coal-bed natural gas; energy development; greater sage-grouse; habitat; land-use change; resource selection function; sagebrush; scale; winter;
D O I
10.2193/2006-454
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Recent energy development has resulted in rapid and large-scale changes to western shrub-steppe ecosystems without a complete understanding of its potential impacts on wildlife populations. We modeled winter habitat use by female greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in the Powder River Basin (PRB) of Wyoming and Montana, USA, to 1) identify landscape features that influenced sage-grouse habitat selection, 2) assess the scale at which selection occurred, 3) spatially depict winter habitat quality in a Geographic Information System, and 4) assess the effect of coal-bed natural gas (CBNG) development on winter habitat selection. We developed a model of winter habitat selection based on 435 aerial relocations of 200 radiomarked female sage-grouse obtained during the winters of 2005 and 2006. Percent sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) cover on the landscape was an important predictor of use by sage-grouse in winter. The strength of habitat selection between sage-grouse and sagebrush was strongest at a 4-km(2) scale. Sage-grouse avoided coniferous habitats at a 0.65-km(2) scale and riparian areas at a 4-km(2) scale. A toughness index showed that sage-grouse selected gentle topography in winter. After controlling for vegetation and topography, the addition of a variable that quantified the density of CBNG wells within 4 km(2) improved model fit by 6.66 Akaike's Information Criterion points (Akaike wt = 0.965). The odds ratio for each additional well in a 4-km(2) area (0.877; 95% CI = 0.834-0.923) indicated that sage-grouse avoid CBNG development in otherwise suitable winter habitat. Sage-grouse were 1.3 times more likely to occupy sagebrush habitats that lacked CBNG wells within a 4-km(2) area, compared to those that had the maximum density of 12.3 wells per 4 km(2) allowed on federal lands. We validated the model with 74 locations from 74 radiomarked individuals obtained during the winters of 2004 and 2007. This winter habitat model based on vegetation, topography, and CBNG avoidance was highly predictive (validation R-2 = 0.984). Our spatially explicit model can be used to identify areas that provide the best remaining habitat for wintering sage-grouse in the PRB to mitigate impacts of energy development.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 195
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Greater sage-grouse habitat selection varies across the marginal habitat of its lagging range margin
    Beers, Aidan T.
    Frey, Shandra N.
    ECOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (07):
  • [22] Potential for post-fire recovery of Greater Sage-grouse habitat
    Riginos, Corinna
    Monaco, Thomas A.
    Veblen, Kari E.
    Gunnell, Kevin
    Thacker, Eric
    Dahlgren, David
    Messmer, Terry
    ECOSPHERE, 2019, 10 (11):
  • [23] Winter Habitat Use of Greater Sage-Grouse Relative to Activity Levels at Natural Gas Well Pads
    Holloran, Matthew J.
    Fedy, Bradley C.
    Dahlke, John
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2015, 79 (04): : 630 - 640
  • [24] Greater Sage-Grouse Nesting Habitat: The Importance of Managing at Multiple Scales
    Doherty, Kevin E.
    Naugle, David E.
    Walker, Brett L.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 74 (07): : 1544 - 1553
  • [25] Assessing Greater Sage-Grouse Breeding Habitat With Aerial and Ground Imagery
    Beck, Jeffrey L.
    Booth, D. Terrance
    Kennedy, Carmen L.
    RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2014, 67 (03) : 328 - 332
  • [26] Greater Sage-Grouse Male Lek Counts Relative to a Wind Energy Development
    LeBeau, Chad W.
    Beck, Jeffrey L.
    Johnson, Gregory D.
    Nielson, Ryan M.
    Holloran, Matthew J.
    Gerow, Kenneth G.
    McDonald, Trent L.
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2017, 41 (01): : 17 - 26
  • [27] Thresholds and Time Lags in Effects of Energy Development on Greater Sage-Grouse Populations
    Harju, Seth M.
    Dzialak, Matthew R.
    Taylor, Renee C.
    Hayden-Wing, Larry D.
    Winstead, Jeffrey B.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 74 (03): : 437 - 448
  • [28] Observations of Greater Sage-Grouse at a solar energy facility in Wyoming
    Gerringer, Michael B.
    Smith, Kurt T.
    Kosciuch, Karl L.
    WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2022, 82 (01) : 196 - 200
  • [29] SAGE GROUSE FLOCK CHARACTERISTICS AND HABITAT SELECTION IN WINTER
    BECK, TDI
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1977, 41 (01): : 18 - 26
  • [30] Investigating impacts of oil and gas development on greater sage-grouse
    Green, Adam W.
    Aldridge, Cameron L.
    O'Donnell, Michael S.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 81 (01): : 46 - 57