Greater sage-grouse winter habitat selection and energy development

被引:160
|
作者
Doherty, Kevin E. [1 ]
Naugle, David E. [1 ]
Walker, Brett L. [1 ]
Graham, Jon M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montana, Wildlife Biol Program, Coll Forestry & Conservat, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[2] Univ Montana, Dept Math Sci, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT | 2008年 / 72卷 / 01期
关键词
Centrocercus urophasianus; coal-bed natural gas; energy development; greater sage-grouse; habitat; land-use change; resource selection function; sagebrush; scale; winter;
D O I
10.2193/2006-454
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Recent energy development has resulted in rapid and large-scale changes to western shrub-steppe ecosystems without a complete understanding of its potential impacts on wildlife populations. We modeled winter habitat use by female greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in the Powder River Basin (PRB) of Wyoming and Montana, USA, to 1) identify landscape features that influenced sage-grouse habitat selection, 2) assess the scale at which selection occurred, 3) spatially depict winter habitat quality in a Geographic Information System, and 4) assess the effect of coal-bed natural gas (CBNG) development on winter habitat selection. We developed a model of winter habitat selection based on 435 aerial relocations of 200 radiomarked female sage-grouse obtained during the winters of 2005 and 2006. Percent sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) cover on the landscape was an important predictor of use by sage-grouse in winter. The strength of habitat selection between sage-grouse and sagebrush was strongest at a 4-km(2) scale. Sage-grouse avoided coniferous habitats at a 0.65-km(2) scale and riparian areas at a 4-km(2) scale. A toughness index showed that sage-grouse selected gentle topography in winter. After controlling for vegetation and topography, the addition of a variable that quantified the density of CBNG wells within 4 km(2) improved model fit by 6.66 Akaike's Information Criterion points (Akaike wt = 0.965). The odds ratio for each additional well in a 4-km(2) area (0.877; 95% CI = 0.834-0.923) indicated that sage-grouse avoid CBNG development in otherwise suitable winter habitat. Sage-grouse were 1.3 times more likely to occupy sagebrush habitats that lacked CBNG wells within a 4-km(2) area, compared to those that had the maximum density of 12.3 wells per 4 km(2) allowed on federal lands. We validated the model with 74 locations from 74 radiomarked individuals obtained during the winters of 2004 and 2007. This winter habitat model based on vegetation, topography, and CBNG avoidance was highly predictive (validation R-2 = 0.984). Our spatially explicit model can be used to identify areas that provide the best remaining habitat for wintering sage-grouse in the PRB to mitigate impacts of energy development.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 195
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HABITAT SELECTION BY GREATER SAGE-GROUSE DURING WINTER IN SOUTHEASTERN OREGON
    Hagen, Christian A.
    Willis, Mitchell J.
    Glenn, Elizabeth M.
    Anthony, Robert G.
    WESTERN NORTH AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2011, 71 (04) : 529 - 538
  • [2] Prioritizing winter habitat quality for greater sage-grouse in a landscape influenced by energy development
    Smith, Kurt T.
    Kirol, Christopher P.
    Beck, Jeffrey L.
    Blomquist, Frank C.
    ECOSPHERE, 2014, 5 (02):
  • [3] Greater sage-grouse habitat selection, survival, and wind energy infrastructure
    LeBeau, Chad W.
    Johnson, Gregory D.
    Holloran, Matthew J.
    Beck, Jeffrey L.
    Nielson, Ryan M.
    Kauffman, Mandy E.
    Rodemaker, Eli J.
    McDonald, Trent L.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 81 (04): : 690 - 711
  • [4] Sage-Grouse Habitat Selection During Winter in Alberta
    Carpenter, Jennifer
    Aldridge, Cameron
    Boyce, Mark S.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 74 (08): : 1806 - 1814
  • [5] Greater sage-grouse population response to energy development and habitat loss
    Walker, Brett L.
    Naugle, David E.
    Doherty, Kevin E.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 71 (08): : 2644 - 2654
  • [6] Do greater sage-grouse exhibit maladaptive habitat selection?
    Pratt, Aaron C.
    Beck, Jeffrey L.
    ECOSPHERE, 2021, 12 (03):
  • [7] Greater sage-grouse nesting habitat selection and success in Wyoming
    Holloran, MJ
    Heath, BJ
    Lyon, AG
    Slater, SJ
    Kuipers, JL
    Anderson, SH
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2005, 69 (02): : 638 - 649
  • [8] Greater sage-grouse winter habitat use on the eastern edge of their range
    Swanson, Christopher C.
    Rumble, Mark A.
    Grovenburg, Troy W.
    Kaczor, Nicholas W.
    Klaver, Robert W.
    Herman-Brunson, Katie M.
    Jenks, Jonathan A.
    Jensen, Kent C.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 77 (03): : 486 - 494
  • [9] Greater Sage-Grouse and Severe Winter Conditions: Identifying Habitat for Conservation
    Dzialak, Matthew R.
    Webb, Stephen L.
    Harju, Seth M.
    Olson, Chad V.
    Winstead, Jeffrey B.
    Hayden-Wing, Larry D.
    RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2013, 66 (01) : 10 - 18
  • [10] Predicting greater sage-grouse habitat selection at the southern periphery of their range
    Picardi, Simona
    Messmer, Terry
    Crabb, Ben
    Kohl, Michel
    Dahlgren, David
    Frey, Nicki
    Larsen, Randy
    Baxter, Rick
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2020, 10 (23): : 13451 - 13463