A Field Study on the Arching Behavior of a Geogrid-Reinforced Floating Pile-Supported Embankment

被引:11
|
作者
Pan, Gaofeng [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Xianfeng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yuan, Shengyang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Yibo [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Danxi [4 ]
Feng, Yan [5 ]
Jiang, Guanlu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Key Lab High Speed Railway Engn, Minist Educ, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Xinjiang Inst Engn, Urumqi 860023, Peoples R China
[4] Waseda Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Tokyo 1698555, Japan
[5] Huaiyin Inst Technol, Key Lab Traff & Transportat Secur Jiangsu Prov, Huaian 223003, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Subgrade engineering; Geogrid-reinforced floating pile-supported; embankment; Soil arching effect; Field test; Load transfer; NUMERICAL-ANALYSIS; ANALYTICAL-MODEL; DESIGN; PLATFORM; SOILS;
D O I
10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100795
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Geogrid-reinforced floating pile-supported (GRFPS) embankments are widely used in areas with moderately compressed soil. Due to the interaction among foundation soil, suspended piles and geogrids, the characteristics of stress and deformation are very complicated. In this paper, a field filling test of GRFPS embankments with two pile lengths (L = 8 m, 15 m), S1 and S2, was carried out in areas with moderately compressed soil. The evolution of soil arching, deformation of soil, piles and geogrids during the construction and equilibrium stage of embankments were monitored. Results show that with the increasing of filling height, there were three stages for the evolution soil arching: no soil arching, formation of soil arching, and stabilization of soil arching. When the pile-soil settlement ratio eta reached its minimum value, soil arching formed, and the differential settlement between pile and soil at the top of pile cap (& UDelta;delta) was around 1% of the net pile spacing (s -d, where s is the pile spacing, d is the diameter of pile cap). The corresponding critical filling heights (H-cri) were 1.4 (s - d) and 3(s - d) for S1 and S2, respectively. The strain of geogrid mainly developed during the initial stage of filling with the development of & UDelta;delta. When the filling height was larger than 5.2 m, the magnitude of soil arching was larger for the embankment with longer pile length (S2). Meanwhile, for S2, the soil arching coefficient C-c gradually transited from friction piles into the end-bearing piles with the increasing filing height of the embankment. The strain of the geogrid mainly occurs in the initial stage of filling (t < 75 d), mainly due to the differential settlement between the pile and soil. After that, the overall settlement of the composite foundation also slightly caused the strain of the geogrid. Finally, three states of soil arching effects of the GRFPS embankment and the evolution characteristics of each index under different states are proposed. This case study provides an enhanced understanding of the performance GRFPS embankment.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Soil arching analysis of pile-supported embankment with geosynthetics and verification by centrifuge tests
    Li, Bo
    Chen, Lingwei
    Deng, Wenni
    [J]. GEOSYNTHETICS: LEADING THE WAY TO A RESILIENT PLANET, 12ICG 2023, 2024, : 1059 - 1064
  • [42] Investigation on soil arching effect in visual model test of pile-supported embankment
    桩承式路堤中土拱效应可视化模型试验研究
    [J]. Zhuang, Yan (joanna_zhuang@163.com), 1600, Academia Sinica (39): : 3150 - 3158
  • [43] Calculation for pile efficacy of geosynthetic-reinforced and pile-supported embankment
    Zhang, Jun
    Zheng, Jun-Jie
    Ma, Qiang
    [J]. Zhejiang Daxue Xuebao (Gongxue Ban)/Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2010, 44 (10): : 1950 - 1954
  • [44] Effects of soil arching on behavior of pile-supported railway embankment: 2D FEM approach
    Meena, Naveen Kumar
    Nimbalkar, Sanjay
    Fatahi, Behzad
    Yang, Gui
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2020, 123 (123)
  • [45] FIELD BEHAVIOR OF A GEOGRID-REINFORCED SLOPE
    ALI, FH
    [J]. GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 1993, 12 (01) : 53 - 72
  • [46] Analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankment based on H&R soil arching model
    Zheng, Junjie
    Luo, Xianguo
    Fu, Haiping
    Cao, Wenzhao
    [J]. Huazhong Keji Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 47 (01): : 50 - 54
  • [47] Case history of a geogrid-reinforced embankment supported on vibro concrete columns
    Topolnicki, M
    [J]. GEOSYNTHETICS: APPLICATIONS, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION, 1996, : 333 - 340
  • [48] Effect of geosynthetic creep on reinforced pile-supported embankment systems
    Ariyarathne, P.
    Liyanapathirana, D. S.
    Leo, C. J.
    [J]. GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 20 (06) : 421 - 435
  • [49] Field study on performance of new technique of geosynthetic-reinforced and pile-supported embankment at bridge approach
    ZHANG Jun
    ZHENG JunJie
    ZHAO DuiJia
    CHEN ShouGen
    [J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2016, 59 (01) : 162 - 174
  • [50] Field tests on mechanical behavior of pile-supported embankment in soft soil area
    Yang, Guang-Qing
    Wang, Xin
    Wang, Xi Zhao
    Jin, Jin Zhao
    Zhang, Chao
    [J]. Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2022, 44 (11): : 2089 - 2096