Perfusion MR imaging of enhancing brain tumors: Comparison of arterial spin labeling technique with dynamic susceptibility contrast technique

被引:20
|
作者
Soni, Neetu [1 ]
Dhanota, Devender Pal S. [2 ]
Kumar, Sunil [2 ]
Jaiswal, Awadhesh K. [3 ]
Srivastava, Arun K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Sanjay Gandhi Postgrad Inst Med Sci, Dept Radiodiag, Lucknow 226014, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Sanjay Gandhi Postgrad Inst Med Sci, Dept Radiol, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] Sanjay Gandhi Postgrad Inst Med Sci, Dept Neurosurg, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
关键词
Brain tumor imaging; dynamic susceptibility contrast; magnetic resonance imaging; normalized tumor blood flow; normalized tumor blood volume; pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling; CEREBRAL BLOOD-VOLUME; OLIGODENDROGLIAL TUMORS; FLOW; GRADE;
D O I
10.4103/neuroindia.NI_871_16
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Objective: Arterial spin labeling (ASL) magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion is a noninvasive and repeatable method for quantitatively measuring cerebral blood flow (CBF). This study aims to compare measurements of ASL-derived CBF with dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI in the assessment of enhancing brain tumors (primary and metastatic), with an aim to use ASL as an alternative to DSC. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors (16 meningiomas, 6 gliomas, 3 metastases, 2 cerebellopontine angle schwannoma, 1 central neurocytoma, and 2 low-grade gliomas) were examined using a 3T MR scanner. Values of CBF, regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF), and regional cerebral blood volume (rCBV) were determined in the tumor (T) as well as in the contralateral normal gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM). Tumor-to-GM or WM CBF, rCBF, and rCBV ratios were calculated to estimate normalized perfusion values (i. e., ASL normalized tumor blood flow [nTBF], DSC nTBF, and DSC normalized tumor blood volume [nTBV]) from the ASL and DSC techniques. ASL and DSC MRI derived perfusion parameters were compared using paired t-test and correlated using Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: Mean values for ASL nTBF and DSC nTBF using contralateral GM as the reference point were 2.98 +/- 1.67and 2.91 +/- 1.43, respectively. A very strong correlation coefficient was found between ASL nTBF and DSC nTBF with contralateral GM as the reference region (r = 0.903; R-2 = 0.813). Mean DSC nTBF and DSC nTBV also showed strong correlation (r = 0.83; R-2 = 0.701). Conclusion: Our study results suggested that measurement of CBF from ASL possesses the potential for a noninvasive assessment of blood flow in intracranial tumors as an alternate to DSC MRI, in those patients requiring multiple follow-up imaging and in patients with impaired renal functions.
引用
收藏
页码:1046 / 1052
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Pediatric astrocytic tumor grading: comparison between arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI perfusion
    Morana, Giovanni
    Tortora, Domenico
    Stagliano, Serena
    Nozza, Paolo
    Mascelli, Samantha
    Severino, Mariasavina
    Piatelli, Gianluca
    Consales, Alessandro
    Lequin, Maarten
    Garre, Maria Luisa
    Rossi, Andrea
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2018, 60 (04) : 437 - 446
  • [22] Comparison of Arterial Spin-Labeling and DSC Perfusion MR Imaging in Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Vella, Stephanie
    Lauri, Josef
    Grech, Reuben
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2025, 46 (01) : 178 - 185
  • [23] ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING PERFUSION AND DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST PERFUSION MRI IN POSTTREATMENT MALIGNANT GLIOMA EVALUATION
    Damek, Denise M.
    Ney, Douglas E.
    Borges, Manuel T.
    Colantoni, William
    Bert, Robert
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2012, 14 : 126 - 127
  • [24] Dynamic susceptibility MR perfusion imaging of the brain: not a question of contrast agent molarity
    Valentina Panara
    Piero Chiacchiaretta
    Matteo Rapino
    Valerio Maruotti
    Matteo Parenti
    Eleonora Piccirilli
    Andrea Delli Pizzi
    Massimo Caulo
    Neuroradiology, 2022, 64 : 685 - 692
  • [25] Dynamic susceptibility MR perfusion imaging of the brain: not a question of contrast agent molarity
    Panara, Valentina
    Chiacchiaretta, Piero
    Rapino, Matteo
    Maruotti, Valerio
    Parenti, Matteo
    Piccirilli, Eleonora
    Pizzi, Andrea Delli
    Caulo, Massimo
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2022, 64 (04) : 685 - 692
  • [26] A Comparative Study of Perfusion Measurement in Brain Tumours at 3 Tesla MR: Arterial Spin Labeling versus Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced MRI
    Lehmann, P.
    Monet, P.
    de Marco, G.
    Saliou, G.
    Perrin, M.
    Stoquart-Elsankari, S.
    Bruniau, A.
    Vallee, J. N.
    EUROPEAN NEUROLOGY, 2010, 64 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [27] UTILITY OF ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING (ASL) AND DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST (DSC) PERFUSION MRI IMAGING IN DISTINGUISHING PSEUDOPROGRESSION IN GLIOBLASTOMA
    Lewis, Clifton
    Lucas, Lee
    Pozivilko, David
    Weng, Frank
    Livingston, Brian
    Lu-Emerson, Christine
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2022, 24 : 175 - 175
  • [28] Pediatric perfusion MR imaging using arterial spin labeling
    Wang, J
    Licht, DJ
    NEUROIMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 16 (01) : 149 - +
  • [29] Role of Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging in Acute Stroke: Arterial Spin Labeling Versus Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion
    Gopinath, Ganesan
    Aslam, Malik
    Anusha, Palaniswamy
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [30] Arterial Spin Labeling at 3.0 Tesla in Subacute Ischemia Comparison to Dynamic Susceptibility Perfusion
    Huck, S.
    Kerl, H. U.
    Al-Zghloul, M.
    Groden, C.
    Noelte, I.
    CLINICAL NEURORADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (01) : 29 - 37