Bilateral orchiectomy with or without flutamide for metastatic prostate cancer

被引:702
|
作者
Eisenberger, MA
Blumenstein, BA
Crawford, ED
Miller, G
McLeod, DG
Loehrer, PJ
Wilding, G
Sears, K
Culkin, DJ
Thompson, IM
Bueschen, AJ
Lowe, BA
机构
[1] SW Oncol Grp SWOG 8894, Operat Off, Ctr Stat, San Antonio, TX 78245 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Hosp, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[4] Walter Reed Army Med Ctr, Washington, DC 20307 USA
[5] Indiana Univ, Med Ctr, Indianapolis, IN USA
[6] Univ Wisconsin, Ctr Clin Canc, Madison, WI USA
[7] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[8] Brooke Army Med Ctr, Wilford Hall USAF Med Ctr, San Antonio, TX USA
[9] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97201 USA
来源
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 1998年 / 339卷 / 15期
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJM199810083391504
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Combined androgen blockade for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer consists of an antiandrogen drug plus castration. In a previous trial, we found that adding the antiandrogen flutamide to leuprolide acetate (a synthetic gonadotropin-releasing hormone that results in medical ablation of testicular function) significantly improved survival as compared with that achieved with placebo plus leuprolide acetate. In the current trial, we compared flutamide plus bilateral orchiectomy with placebo plus orchiectomy. Methods We randomly assigned patients who had never received antiandrogen therapy and who had distant metastases from adenocarcinoma of the prostate to treatment with bilateral orchiectomy and either flutamide or placebo. Patients were stratified according to the extent of disease and according to performance status. Results Of the 1387 patients who were enrolled in the trial, 700 were randomly assigned to the flutamide group and 687 to the placebo group. Overall, the incidence of toxic effects was minimal; the only notable differences between the groups were the greater rates of diarrhea and anemia with flutamide. There was no significant difference between the two groups in overall survival (P=0.14). The estimated risk of death (hazard ratio) for flutamide as compared with placebo was 0.91 (90 percent confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.01). Flutamide was not associated with enhanced benefit in patients with minimal disease. Conclusions The addition of flutamide to bilateral orchiectomy does not result in a clinically meaningful improvement in survival among patients with metastatic prostate cancer. (N Engl J Med 1998;339: 1036-42.) (C) 1998, Massachusetts Medical Society.
引用
收藏
页码:1036 / 1042
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Decline in bilateral orchiectomy for prostate cancer in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1956-2000
    Melton, LJ
    Alothman, KI
    Achenbach, SJ
    O'Fallon, WM
    Zincke, H
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 76 (12) : 1199 - 1203
  • [32] IMPROVED SUBJECTIVE RESPONSES TO ORCHIECTOMY PLUS NILUTAMIDE (ANANDRON) IN COMPARISON TO ORCHIECTOMY PLUS PLACEBO IN METASTATIC PROSTATE-CANCER
    DIJKMAN, GA
    DELMORAL, PF
    DEBRUYNE, FMJ
    JANKNEGT, RA
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1995, 27 (03) : 196 - 201
  • [33] ZOLADEX PLUS FLUTAMIDE VS ORCHIECTOMY FOR ADVANCED PROSTATIC-CANCER
    IVERSEN, P
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1990, 18 : 41 - 44
  • [34] Metastatic Prostate Cancer Presenting With Bilateral Inguinal Lymphadenopathy
    Elsaqa, Mohamed
    Sharafeldeen, Mohamed
    Elabbady, Ahmed
    CLINICAL GENITOURINARY CANCER, 2019, 17 (06) : E1185 - E1187
  • [35] GOSERELIN ACETATE AND FLUTAMIDE VERSUS BILATERAL ORCHIECTOMY - A PHASE-III EORTC TRIAL (30853)
    DENIS, LJ
    DEMOURA, JLC
    BONO, A
    SYLVESTER, R
    WHELAN, P
    NEWLING, D
    DEPAUW, M
    FLANIGAN, RC
    UROLOGY, 1993, 42 (02) : 119 - 130
  • [36] COMBINATION THERAPY WITH FLUTAMIDE AND CASTRATION (LHRH AGONIST OR ORCHIECTOMY) IN ADVANCED PROSTATE-CANCER - A MARKED IMPROVEMENT IN RESPONSE AND SURVIVAL
    LABRIE, F
    DUPONT, A
    BELANGER, A
    GIGUERE, M
    LACOURSIERE, Y
    EMOND, J
    MONFETTE, G
    BERGERON, V
    JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1985, 23 (5B): : 833 - 841
  • [37] Metastatic prostate cancer -: a randomized study of cyproterone acetate versus flutamide:: summary of results
    Schröder, FH
    RENAL, BLADDER, PROSTATE AND TESTICULAR CANCER: AN UPDATE, 2001, : 199 - 202
  • [38] CO2-LASER SUBCAPSULAR ORCHIECTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC PROSTATE-CANCER
    BOLTON, DM
    COSTELLO, AJ
    LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 1994, 14 (01) : 88 - 89
  • [39] Phase II trial of suramin, leuprolide, and flutamide in previously untreated metastatic prostate cancer
    Dawson, NA
    Figg, WD
    Cooper, MR
    Sartor, O
    Bergan, RC
    Senderowicz, AM
    Steinberg, SM
    Tompkins, A
    Weinberger, B
    Sausville, EA
    Reed, E
    Myers, CE
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (04) : 1470 - 1477
  • [40] Flutamide versus orchidectomy in the treatment of metastatic prostate carcinoma
    Studer, UE
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1997, 32 (04) : 395 - 396