National Ecosystem Services Assessment in Hungary: Framework, Process and Conceptual Questions

被引:8
|
作者
Vari, Agnes [1 ]
Tanacs, Eszter [1 ]
Kovacs, Eszter Tormane [2 ]
Kaloczkai, Agnes [1 ]
Arany, Ildiko [1 ]
Czucz, Balint [1 ]
Bereczki, Krisztina [1 ]
Belenyesi, Marta [3 ]
Csakvari, Edina [4 ]
Kiss, Marton [1 ,5 ]
Fabok, Veronika [1 ]
Fodor, Livia Kisne [6 ]
Koncz, Peter [1 ]
Lehoczki, Robert [3 ]
Pasztor, Laszlo [7 ]
Pataki, Robert [3 ]
Rezneki, Rita [1 ]
Szerenyi, Zsuzsanna [8 ]
Torok, Katalin [4 ]
Zolei, Aniko [1 ]
Zsembery, Zita [1 ]
Kovacs-Hostyanszki, Aniko [1 ]
机构
[1] Lendulet Ecosyst Serv Res Grp, Ctr Ecol Res, Alkotmany Ut 2-4, H-2163 Vacratot, Hungary
[2] Hungarian Univ Agr & Life Sci, Inst Wildlife Management & Nat Conservat, Pater Karoly U 1, H-2100 Godollo, Hungary
[3] Lechner Knowledge Ctr, Bosnyak Ter 5, H-1149 Budapest, Hungary
[4] Ctr Ecol Res, Restorat Ecol Grp, Alkotmany Ut 2-4, H-2163 Vacratot, Hungary
[5] Univ Szeged, Dept Climatol & Landscape Ecol, Egyet Utca 2, H-6722 Szeged, Hungary
[6] Minist Agr, Dept Nat Conservat, Apaczai Csere Janos U 9, H-1052 Budapest, Hungary
[7] Inst Soil Sci, Ctr Agr Res, H-1022 Budapest, Hungary
[8] Corvinus Univ Budapest, Inst Sustainable Dev, Fovam Ter 8, H-1093 Budapest, Hungary
关键词
mapping and assessment of ecosystem services; ecosystem services cascade; cascade framework; participation; indicators; scenarios; operationalization; BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY; INDICATORS; VALUATION; IMPLEMENTATION; SCENARIOS; INSIGHTS; SUPPORT; SCALES; LEVEL; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/su141912847
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Mapping and assessing ecosystem services (ES) projects at the national level have been implemented recently in the European Union in order to comply with the targets set out in the EU's Biodiversity Strategy for 2020 and later in the Strategy for 2030. In Hungary this work has just been accomplished in a large-scale six-year project. The Hungarian assessment was structured along the ES cascade with each level described by a set of indicators. We present the selected and quantified indicators for 12 ES. For the assessment of cascade level 4, human well-being, a set of relevant well-being dimensions were selected. The whole process was supported by several forms of involvement, interviews, consultations and workshops and in thematic working groups performing the ES quantifications, followed by building scenarios and synthesizing maps and results. Here we give an overview of the main steps and results of the assessment, discuss related conceptual issues and recommend solutions that may be of international relevance. We refine some definitions of the cascade levels and suggest theoretical extensions to the cascade model. By finding a common basis for ES assessments and especially for national ones, we can ensure better comparability of results and better adoption in decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A conceptual framework for the role of the administration medium in the personnel assessment process
    Potosky, Denise
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2008, 33 (03): : 629 - 648
  • [42] A framework for integrating ecosystem services as endpoint impacts in life cycle assessment
    Hardaker, Ashley
    Styles, David
    Williams, Prysor
    Chadwick, Dave
    Dandy, Norman
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 370
  • [43] Ecosystem services in life cycle assessment - Part 1: A computational framework
    Liu, Xinyu
    Ziv, Guy
    Bakshi, Bhavik R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 197 : 314 - 322
  • [44] Indicators for biodiversity and ecosystem services: towards an improved framework for ecosystems assessment
    Feld, Christian K.
    Sousa, Jose Paulo
    da Silva, Pedro Martins
    Dawson, Terence P.
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2010, 19 (10) : 2895 - 2919
  • [45] A Framework for Ecosystem Services Valuation
    Martin, Laura J.
    Blossey, Bernd
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2009, 23 (02) : 494 - 496
  • [46] Mapping and assessment of ecosystem services at Troodos National Forest Park in Cyprus
    Kounnamas, Constantinos
    Andreou, Marios
    [J]. ONE ECOSYSTEM, 2022, 7
  • [47] Supplied, demanded and consumed ecosystem services: Prospects for national assessment in Russia
    Bukvareva, E.
    Zamolodchikov, D.
    Kraev, G.
    Grunewald, K.
    Narykov, A.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 78 : 351 - 360
  • [48] Implications of landscape changes for ecosystem services and biodiversity: A national assessment in Ecuador
    Koo, Hongmi
    Kleemann, Janina
    Cuenca, Pablo
    Noh, Jin Kyoung
    Fuerst, Christine
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2024, 69
  • [49] Economic Analysis for the UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis and Scenario Valuation of Changes in Ecosystem Services
    Ian J. Bateman
    Amii R. Harwood
    David J. Abson
    Barnaby Andrews
    Andrew Crowe
    Steve Dugdale
    Carlo Fezzi
    Jo Foden
    David Hadley
    Roy Haines-Young
    Mark Hulme
    Andreas Kontoleon
    Paul Munday
    Unai Pascual
    James Paterson
    Grischa Perino
    Antara Sen
    Gavin Siriwardena
    Mette Termansen
    [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2014, 57 : 273 - 297
  • [50] Economic Analysis for the UK National Ecosystem Assessment: Synthesis and Scenario Valuation of Changes in Ecosystem Services
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Harwood, Amii R.
    Abson, David J.
    Andrews, Barnaby
    Crowe, Andrew
    Dugdale, Steve
    Fezzi, Carlo
    Foden, Jo
    Hadley, David
    Haines-Young, Roy
    Hulme, Mark
    Kontoleon, Andreas
    Munday, Paul
    Pascual, Unai
    Paterson, James
    Perino, Grischa
    Sen, Antara
    Siriwardena, Gavin
    Termansen, Mette
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2014, 57 (02): : 273 - 297