Propofol vs midazolam for ICU sedation - A Canadian multicenter randomized trial

被引:102
|
作者
Hall, RI
Sandham, D
Cardinal, P
Tweeddale, M
Moher, D
Wang, XH
Anis, AH
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth 2 Hlth Sci Ctr, Halifax, NS B3H 3A7, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Foothills Hosp, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Ottawa Gen Hosp, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
[4] Vancouver Gen Hosp, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Ottawa Civic Hosp, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
[6] St Pauls Hosp, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
[7] Univ British Columbia, Dept Hlth Care & Epidemiol, Vancouver, BC V6T 1W5, Canada
关键词
ICU; mechanical ventilation; midazolam; multicenter; propofol; randomized clinical trial; sedation;
D O I
10.1378/chest.119.4.1151
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objectives: To determine whether sedation with propofol would lead to shorter times to tracheal extubation and ICU length of stay than sedation with midazolam. Design: Multicenter, randomized, open label. Setting: Four academic tertiary-care ICUs in Canada. Patients: Critically ill patients requiring continuous sedation while receiving mechanical ventilation. Interventions: Random allocation by predicted requirement for mechanical ventilation (short sedation stratum, < 24 h; medium sedation stratum, <greater than or equal to> 24 and < 72 h; and long sedation stratum, 72 h) to sedation regimens utilizing propofol or midazolam. Measurements and results: Using an intention-to-treat analysis, patients randomized to receive propofol in the short sedation stratum (propofol, 21 patients; midazolam, 26 patients) and the long sedation stratum (propofol, 4 patients; midazolam, 10 patients) were extubated earlier (short sedation stratum: propofol, 5.6 h; midazolam, 11.9 h; long sedation stratum: propofol, 8.4 h; midazolam, 46.8 h; p < 0.05). Pooled results showed that patients treated with propofol (n = 46) were extubated earlier than those treated with midazolam (n = 53) (6.7 vs 24.7 h, respectively; p < 0.05) following discontinuation of the sedation but were not discharged from ICU earlier (94.0 vs 63.7 h, respectively; p = 0.26), Propofol-treated patients spent a larger percentage of time at the target Ramsay sedation level than midazolam-treated patients (60.2% vs 44.0%, respectively; p < 0.05) Using a treatment-received analysis, propofol sedation either did not differ from midazolam sedation in time to tracheal extubation or ICU discharge (sedation duration, < 24 h) or was associated with earlier tracheal extubation but longer time to ICU discharge (sedation duration, <greater than or equal to> 24 h, < 72 h, or < 72 h). Conclusions: The use of propofol sedation allowed for more rapid tracheal extubation than when midazolam sedation was employed. This did not result in earlier ICU discharge.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:1151 / 1159
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Propofol and Midazolam versus propofol alone for sedation following coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial
    Walder, B
    Borgeat, A
    Suter, PM
    Romand, JA
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2002, 30 (02) : 171 - 178
  • [42] Dexmedetomidine, morphine, propofol vs midazolam, morphine, propofol for conscious sedation in rhinoplasty under local anesthesia. A prospective, randomized study
    Ragab, Ashraf
    El Shamaa, Hossam
    Ibrahim, Mohamed
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2013, 29 (03) : 181 - 187
  • [43] Colonoscopy sedation: clinical trial comparing propofol and fentanyl with or without midazolam
    Nunes Pereira das Neves, Jose Francisco
    Pereira das Neves Araujo, Mariana Moraes
    Araujo, Fernando de Paiva
    Ferreira, Clarice Martins
    Neves Duarte, Fabiana Baeta
    Pace, Fabio Heleno
    Ornellas, Laura Cotta
    Baron, Todd H.
    Vieira de Castro Ferreira, Lincoln Eduardo Villela
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2016, 66 (03): : 231 - 236
  • [44] Sedation without anesthesiologist in 5250 endoscopic procedures: Midazolam vs. midazolam plus dolantine vs. propofol
    Gonzalez-Huix, F
    Aldeguer, X
    Fort, E
    Salinas, E
    Figa, M
    Hombrados, M
    Chavero, R
    Acero, D
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 59 (05) : AB133 - AB133
  • [45] Low-Dose Fentanyl, Propofol, Midazolam, Ketamine and Lidocaine Combination vs. Regular Dose Propofol and Fentanyl Combination for Deep Sedation Induction; a Randomized Clinical Trial
    Amini, Afshin
    Dolatabadi, Ali Arhami
    Kariman, Hamid
    Hatamabadi, Hamidreza
    Memary, Elham
    Salimi, Sohrab
    Shokrzadeh, Shahram
    EMERGENCY, 2018, 6 (01):
  • [46] Propofol and midazolam for sedation of the critically ill
    Swann, D
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (10) : 1761 - 1761
  • [47] Prolonged sedation with midazolam or propofol - Reply
    BarrientosVega, R
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (03) : 557 - 557
  • [48] Etomidate and midazolam for procedural sedation: prospective, randomized trial
    Hunt, GS
    Spencer, MT
    Hays, DP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 23 (03): : 299 - 303
  • [49] INFUSION OF PROPOFOL VS SUFENTANIL MIDAZOLAM FOR SEDATION FOLLOWING AORTIC-SURGERY
    AMSELLEM, D
    DUCARD, A
    GODET, G
    COMET, JP
    ISMAIL, M
    CORIAT, P
    VIARS, P
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 72 : 90 - 90
  • [50] Addition of propofol, midazolam, or haloperidol to sufentanil for intravenous sedation in the ICU using the bispectral index
    B Tukenmez
    D Memis
    Z Pamukcu
    Critical Care, 10 (Suppl 1):