Propofol vs midazolam for ICU sedation - A Canadian multicenter randomized trial

被引:102
|
作者
Hall, RI
Sandham, D
Cardinal, P
Tweeddale, M
Moher, D
Wang, XH
Anis, AH
机构
[1] Queen Elizabeth 2 Hlth Sci Ctr, Halifax, NS B3H 3A7, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Foothills Hosp, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] Ottawa Gen Hosp, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
[4] Vancouver Gen Hosp, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Ottawa Civic Hosp, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
[6] St Pauls Hosp, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
[7] Univ British Columbia, Dept Hlth Care & Epidemiol, Vancouver, BC V6T 1W5, Canada
关键词
ICU; mechanical ventilation; midazolam; multicenter; propofol; randomized clinical trial; sedation;
D O I
10.1378/chest.119.4.1151
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objectives: To determine whether sedation with propofol would lead to shorter times to tracheal extubation and ICU length of stay than sedation with midazolam. Design: Multicenter, randomized, open label. Setting: Four academic tertiary-care ICUs in Canada. Patients: Critically ill patients requiring continuous sedation while receiving mechanical ventilation. Interventions: Random allocation by predicted requirement for mechanical ventilation (short sedation stratum, < 24 h; medium sedation stratum, <greater than or equal to> 24 and < 72 h; and long sedation stratum, 72 h) to sedation regimens utilizing propofol or midazolam. Measurements and results: Using an intention-to-treat analysis, patients randomized to receive propofol in the short sedation stratum (propofol, 21 patients; midazolam, 26 patients) and the long sedation stratum (propofol, 4 patients; midazolam, 10 patients) were extubated earlier (short sedation stratum: propofol, 5.6 h; midazolam, 11.9 h; long sedation stratum: propofol, 8.4 h; midazolam, 46.8 h; p < 0.05). Pooled results showed that patients treated with propofol (n = 46) were extubated earlier than those treated with midazolam (n = 53) (6.7 vs 24.7 h, respectively; p < 0.05) following discontinuation of the sedation but were not discharged from ICU earlier (94.0 vs 63.7 h, respectively; p = 0.26), Propofol-treated patients spent a larger percentage of time at the target Ramsay sedation level than midazolam-treated patients (60.2% vs 44.0%, respectively; p < 0.05) Using a treatment-received analysis, propofol sedation either did not differ from midazolam sedation in time to tracheal extubation or ICU discharge (sedation duration, < 24 h) or was associated with earlier tracheal extubation but longer time to ICU discharge (sedation duration, <greater than or equal to> 24 h, < 72 h, or < 72 h). Conclusions: The use of propofol sedation allowed for more rapid tracheal extubation than when midazolam sedation was employed. This did not result in earlier ICU discharge.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1159
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Propofol vs midazolam for sedation
    HansenFlaschen, J
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (01) : 179 - 179
  • [2] A randomized trial of propofol and midazolam for sedation in upper GI-endoscopy.
    Jung, M
    Hofmann, C
    Brackertz, A
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1998, 114 (04) : A20 - A21
  • [3] Comparative study of propofol versus midazolam in the sedation of critically ill patients: Results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial
    Chamorro, C
    deLatorre, FJ
    Montero, A
    SanchezIzquierdo, JA
    Jareno, A
    Moreno, JA
    Gonzalez, E
    Barrios, M
    Carpintero, JL
    MartinSantos, F
    Otero, B
    Ginestal, R
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 24 (06) : 932 - 939
  • [4] Remifentanil/propofol versus fentanyl/midazolam for ICU sedation
    Wilhelm, W.
    Wrobel, M.
    Ketter, R.
    Steudel, W.
    Kreuer, S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 21 : 173 - 173
  • [5] A clinical trial of propofol vs midazolam for procedural sedation in a pediatric emergency department
    Havel, CJ
    Strait, RT
    Hennes, H
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1999, 6 (10) : 989 - 997
  • [6] Midazolam versus propofol for long-term sedation in the ICU: a randomized prospective comparison
    A. A. Weinbroum
    V. Rudick
    P. Sorkine
    M. Freedman
    E. Geller
    P. Halpern
    [J]. Intensive Care Medicine, 1997, 23 : 1258 - 1263
  • [7] Midazolam versus propofol for long-term sedation in the ICU: a randomized prospective comparison
    Weinbroum, AA
    Halpern, P
    Rudick, V
    Sorkine, P
    Freedman, M
    Geller, E
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 23 (12) : 1258 - 1263
  • [8] SEDATION IN EUS: PROPOFOL AND MIDAZOLAM VS PROPOFOL, MIDAZOLAM AND FENTANYL. PRELIMINARY DATA
    Nespoli, M. R.
    Tosone, M.
    Palmieri, A. Macarone
    Bianchi, M.
    Monastra, L.
    D'Amore, E.
    De Luca, L.
    [J]. DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2008, 40 : S147 - S147
  • [9] Comparison of co-sedation with propofol plus midazolam, propofol and midazolam for sedation of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation in the ICU
    Özsezgin, S
    Gökmen, N
    Erdem, Ö
    Arkan, A
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 82 : 165 - 165
  • [10] Effect of the midazolam added with propofol-based sedation in esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A randomized trial
    Kim, Eun Hye
    Park, Jun Chul
    Shin, Sung Kwan
    Lee, Yong Chan
    Lee, Sang Kil
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 33 (04) : 894 - 899