Predicted preference conjoint analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Radas, Sonja [1 ,2 ]
Prelec, Drazen [2 ]
机构
[1] Inst Econ, Zagreb, Croatia
[2] MIT, Sloan Sch Management, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 08期
关键词
INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0256010
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In this paper we propose a new method of eliciting market research information. Instead of asking respondents for their personal choices and preferences, we ask respondents to predict the choices of other respondents to the survey. Such predictions tap respondents' knowledge of peers, whether based on direct social contacts or on more general cultural information. The effectiveness of this approach has already been demonstrated in the context of political polling. Here we extend it to market research, specifically, to conjoint analysis. An advantage of the new approach is that it can elicit reliable responses in situations where people are not comfortable with disclosing their true preferences, but may be willing to give information about people around them. A theoretical argument demonstrates that predictions should yield utility estimates that are more accurate. These theoretical results are confirmed in four online experiments.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Beyond conjoint analysis: Advances in preference measurement
    Oded Netzer
    Olivier Toubia
    Eric T. Bradlow
    Ely Dahan
    Theodoros Evgeniou
    Fred M. Feinberg
    Eleanor M. Feit
    Sam K. Hui
    Joseph Johnson
    John C. Liechty
    James B. Orlin
    Vithala R. Rao
    [J]. Marketing Letters, 2008, 19 : 337 - 354
  • [2] CONJOINT-ANALYSIS VS PREFERENCE ANALYSIS - A COMPARISON
    SCHORI, TR
    MEADOW, HL
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1987, 60 (03) : 1063 - 1068
  • [3] Conjoint analysis of consumer preference for bluefin tuna
    Ariji, Masahiko
    [J]. FISHERIES SCIENCE, 2010, 76 (06) : 1023 - 1028
  • [4] Beyond conjoint analysis: Advances in preference measurement
    Netzer, Oded
    Toubia, Olivier
    Bradlow, Eric T.
    Dahan, Ely
    Evgeniou, Theodoros
    Feinberg, Fred M.
    Feit, Eleanor M.
    Hui, Sam K.
    Johnson, Joseph
    Liechty, John C.
    Orlin, James B.
    Rao, Vithala R.
    [J]. MARKETING LETTERS, 2008, 19 (3-4) : 337 - 354
  • [5] Conjoint analysis of consumer preference for bluefin tuna
    Masahiko Ariji
    [J]. Fisheries Science, 2010, 76 : 1023 - 1028
  • [6] CAPTURING CONSUMER PREFERENCE THROUGH EXPERIENTIAL CONJOINT ANALYSIS
    Tovares, Noah
    Cagan, Jonathan
    Boatwright, Peter
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2013, VOL 5, 2014,
  • [7] Females' attitude and preference for beer: a conjoint analysis study
    Muggah, Elizabeth M.
    McSweeney, Matthew B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 52 (03): : 808 - 816
  • [8] Consumer Preference Analysis on Attributes of Milk Tea: A Conjoint Analysis Approach
    Ong, Ardvin Kester S.
    Prasetyo, Yogi Tri
    Libiran, Ma Althea Deniella C.
    Lontoc, Yuanne Mae A.
    Lunaria, Joyce Anne V.
    Manalo, Adelaine M.
    Miraja, Bobby Ardiansyah
    Young, Michael Nayat
    Chuenyindee, Thanatorn
    Persada, Satria Fadil
    Perwira Redi, Anak Agung Ngurah
    [J]. FOODS, 2021, 10 (06)
  • [9] Using conjoint analysis to understand preference for online survey layout
    King, Craig V.
    Labas, Romain
    Renaudin, Christian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2019, 61 (06) : 621 - 634
  • [10] Understanding Stakeholder Preference for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: A Conjoint Analysis
    Shamsunder, Meghana G.
    Panchal, Hina
    Pilewskie, Melissa
    Lee, Clara
    Razdan, Shantanu N.
    Matros, Evan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2021, 233 (05) : 606 - +