A new approach to R&D project selection problem and a solution proposal: UTA method

被引:0
|
作者
Binici, Ela [1 ]
Aksakal, Erdem [2 ]
机构
[1] Erzurum Tekn Univ, Proje Uygulama & Arastirma Merkezi, Erzurum, Turkey
[2] Ataturk Univ, Muhendislik Fak, Endustri Muhendisligi Bolumu, Erzurum, Turkey
关键词
UTA method; Selection of R&D projects; Multi criteria decision method; ADDITIVE UTILITY-FUNCTIONS; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; MODEL; TECHNOLOGY; RANKING; ALTERNATIVES; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.5505/pajes.2019.45945
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Nowadays with the rapid increase in globalization, competitiveness is based on the information. Information is transformed into science and technology by systematizing with research and development studies. The development of a country, producing added value, providing employment, continuing to increase in production continuously is only possible by increasing the information content and by converting the increasing information into science and technology. Considering the variety of products and services is very much, innovation is necessary for countries and producers for to continue and compete in the activities. In this regard, research and development (R&D) carries great importance. R&D can be defined as the development of new products, new production methods, or the acquisition of new technologies, products, production methods from present information. As it is in other countries, our country also encourages R&D investments and supports R & D investments. In determining the size of support according to the R&D dimension, the value added which will be effective can be evaluated as benefit. For this purpose, in our study, the projects were ranked in a competition where R & D projects are selected by considering the efficient use of supports. In this sense, the UTA Method which is one of Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods was preferred for the solution process for our problem. UTA method preferred because of its considering marginal utility structure and linear programming approach. The GAMS program was used to solve the mathematical model obtained during the solution process. Because of being benefit-based, it has been tried to be shown that the solution can support the ranking of projects more effectively and correctly.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 226
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Training Method Proposal for R&D Project Managers
    Kiyota, Mamoru
    Kubo, Hiroshi
    [J]. PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (PICMET 2016): TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FOR SOCIAL INNOVATION, 2016, : 2088 - 2095
  • [2] R&D project selection versus R&D project generation
    Bordley, RF
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1998, 45 (04) : 407 - 413
  • [3] A fuzzy approach to R&D project portfolio selection
    Carlsson, Christer
    Fuller, Robert
    Heikkila, Markku
    Majlender, Peter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2007, 44 (02) : 93 - 105
  • [4] Process analytics approach for R&D project selection
    [J]. Silva, Thushari, 1600, Association for Computing Machinery, 2 Penn Plaza, Suite 701, New York, NY 10121-0701, United States (05):
  • [5] Public R&D project portfolio selection problem with cancellations
    Musa Çağlar
    Sinan Gürel
    [J]. OR Spectrum, 2017, 39 : 659 - 687
  • [6] Public R&D project portfolio selection problem with cancellations
    Caglar, Musa
    Gurel, Sinan
    [J]. OR SPECTRUM, 2017, 39 (03) : 659 - 687
  • [7] A fuzzy approach to optimal R&D project portfolio selection
    Carlsson, Christer
    Fuller, Robert
    Majlender, Peter
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, THEORY AND APPLICATION, 2006, : 5 - 13
  • [8] A multicriteria sorting approach based on data envelopment analysis for R&D project selection problem
    Karasakal, Esra
    Aker, Pinar
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2017, 73 : 79 - 92
  • [9] Classification of R&D projects and selection of R&D project management concept
    Kuchta, Dorota
    Skowron, Dorota
    [J]. R & D MANAGEMENT, 2016, 46 (05) : 831 - 841
  • [10] R&D project selection - Martino,JP
    Martin, M
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1997, 44 (03) : 332 - 332