A multicriteria sorting approach based on data envelopment analysis for R&D project selection problem

被引:59
|
作者
Karasakal, Esra [1 ]
Aker, Pinar [1 ]
机构
[1] Middle East Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-06800 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Multiple criteria sorting; Data envelopment analysis; Interval analytic hierarchy process; UTADIS; R&D project selection; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; DEA-DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; GOAL PROGRAMMING METHOD; EFFICIENCY; RANKING; WEIGHTS; PERFORMANCE; MODEL; MCDM; MULTIPLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.omega.2016.12.006
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In this paper, multiple criteria sorting methods based on data envelopment analysis (DEA) are developed to evaluate research and development (R&D) projects. The weight intervals of the criteria are obtained from Interval Analytic Hierarchy Process and employed as the assurance region constraints of models. Based on data envelopment analysis, two threshold estimation models, and five assignment models are developed for sorting. In addition to sorting, these models also provide ranking of the projects. The developed approach and the well-known sorting method UTADIS are applied to a real case study to analyze the R&D projects proposed to a grant program executed by a government funding agency in 2009. A five level R&D project selection criteria hierarchy and an assisting point allocation guide are defined to measure and quantify the performance of the projects. In the case study, the developed methods are observed to be more stable than UTADIS. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 92
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fuzzy multicriteria R&D project selection with a real options valuation model
    Tolga, A. Cagri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2008, 19 (4-5) : 359 - 371
  • [2] Multicriteria analysis in project selection problem
    Nowak, M
    [J]. 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODERN BUILDING MATERIALS, STRUCTURES AND TECHNIQUES, 2004, : 236 - 241
  • [3] R&D project selection versus R&D project generation
    Bordley, RF
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1998, 45 (04) : 407 - 413
  • [4] A fuzzy approach to R&D project portfolio selection
    Carlsson, Christer
    Fuller, Robert
    Heikkila, Markku
    Majlender, Peter
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2007, 44 (02) : 93 - 105
  • [5] Process analytics approach for R&D project selection
    [J]. Silva, Thushari, 1600, Association for Computing Machinery, 2 Penn Plaza, Suite 701, New York, NY 10121-0701, United States (05):
  • [6] A new approach to R&D project selection problem and a solution proposal: UTA method
    Binici, Ela
    Aksakal, Erdem
    [J]. PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITESI MUHENDISLIK BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2020, 26 (01): : 211 - 226
  • [7] Public R&D project portfolio selection problem with cancellations
    Musa Çağlar
    Sinan Gürel
    [J]. OR Spectrum, 2017, 39 : 659 - 687
  • [8] Public R&D project portfolio selection problem with cancellations
    Caglar, Musa
    Gurel, Sinan
    [J]. OR SPECTRUM, 2017, 39 (03) : 659 - 687
  • [9] Identifying the Policy Direction of National R&D Programs Based on Data Envelopment Analysis and Diversity Index Approach
    Choi, Myoungjae
    Kwon, Ohjin
    Won, Dongkyu
    Jang, Wooseok
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (22)
  • [10] A fuzzy approach to optimal R&D project portfolio selection
    Carlsson, Christer
    Fuller, Robert
    Majlender, Peter
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, THEORY AND APPLICATION, 2006, : 5 - 13