Investigating Mental Health Service User Opinions on Clinical Data Sharing: Qualitative Focus Group Study

被引:5
|
作者
Adanijo, Abimbola [1 ,2 ]
McWilliams, Caoimhe [1 ,2 ]
Wykes, Til [1 ,2 ]
Jilka, Sagar [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Psychol, Henry Wellcome Bldg,De Crespigny Pk, London SE5 8AF, England
[2] South London & Maudsley NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[3] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Div Mental Hlth & Wellbeing, Coventry, W Midlands, England
来源
JMIR MENTAL HEALTH | 2021年 / 8卷 / 09期
关键词
clinical data; data sharing; mental health data; service users; focus groups; mental health; digital health; health records; EXPERIENCES; CARE; TECHNOLOGY; EPILEPSY; PATIENT; PEOPLE; VIEWS;
D O I
10.2196/30596
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Sharing patient data can help drive scientific advances and improve patient care, but service users are concerned about how their data are used. When the National Health Service proposes to scrape general practitioner records, it is very important that we understand these concerns in some depth. Objective: This study aims to investigate views of mental health service users on acceptable data sharing to provide clear recommendations for future data sharing systems. Methods: A total of 4 focus groups with 4 member-checking groups were conducted via the internet between October 2020 and March 2021, with a total of 22 service users in the United Kingdom. Thematic analysis was used to identify the themes. Results: Six main themes, with several subthemes were identified, such as the purpose of data sharing-for profit, public good, and continuation of care; discrimination through the misattribution of physical symptoms to mental health conditions (ie, diagnostic overshadowing) alongside the discrimination of individuals or groups within society (ie, institutional discrimination); safeguarding data by preserving anonymity and confidentiality, strengthening security measures, and holding organizations accountable; data accuracy and informed consent-increasing transparency about data use and choice; and incorporating service user involvement in system governance to provide insight and increase security. Conclusions: This study extends the limited research on the views and concerns of mental health service users regarding acceptable data sharing. If adopted, the recommendations should improve the confidence of service users in sharing their data. The five recommendations include screening to ensure that data sharing benefits the public, providing service users with information about how their data are shared and what for, highlighting the existing safeguarding procedures, incorporating service user involvement, and developing tailored training for health care professionals to address issues of diagnostic overshadowing and inaccurate health records. Adopting such systems would aid in data sharing for legitimate interests that will benefit patients and the National Health Service.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Views on sharing mental health data for research purposes: qualitative analysis of interviews with people with mental illness
    Emily Watson
    Sue Fletcher-Watson
    Elizabeth Joy Kirkham
    [J]. BMC Medical Ethics, 24
  • [42] Views on sharing mental health data for research purposes: qualitative analysis of interviews with people with mental illness
    Watson, Emily
    Fletcher-Watson, Sue
    Kirkham, Elizabeth Joy
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2023, 24 (01)
  • [43] Healthcare professionals' perspectives on mental health service provision: a pilot focus group study in six European countries
    Triliva, Sofia
    Ntani, Spyridoula
    Giovazolias, Theodoros
    Kafetsios, Konstantinos
    Axelsson, Malin
    Bockting, Claudi
    Buysse, Ann
    Desmet, Mattias
    Dewaele, Alexis
    Hannon, Dewi
    Haukenes, Inger
    Hensing, Gunnel
    Meganck, Reitske
    Rutten, Kris
    Schonning, Viktor
    Van Beveren, Laura
    Vandamme, Joke
    Overland, Simon
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2020, 14 (01)
  • [44] Strengthening the voice of mental health service users and carers in Wales: a focus group study to inform future policy
    Thomas, Phil
    Wilson, Christine
    Jones, Phil
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2010, 34 (05) : 525 - 531
  • [45] Healthcare professionals’ perspectives on mental health service provision: a pilot focus group study in six European countries
    Sofia Triliva
    Spyridoula Ntani
    Theodoros Giovazolias
    Konstantinos Kafetsios
    Malin Axelsson
    Claudi Bockting
    Ann Buysse
    Mattias Desmet
    Alexis Dewaele
    Dewi Hannon
    Inger Haukenes
    Gunnel Hensing
    Reitske Meganck
    Kris Rutten
    Viktor Schønning
    Laura Van Beveren
    Joke Vandamme
    Simon Øverland
    [J]. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 14
  • [46] PUBLIC PREFERENCES FOR IMPROVING HEALTH EQUITY: A QUALITATIVE FOCUS GROUP STUDY
    Cadham, C.
    Ali, S.
    Meza, R.
    Prosser, L.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (06) : S117 - S118
  • [47] Investigating Internet Use by Mental Health Service Users: Interview Study
    Powell, John
    Clarke, Aileen
    [J]. MEDINFO 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH WORLD CONGRESS ON HEALTH (MEDICAL) INFORMATICS, PTS 1 AND 2: BUILDING SUSTAINABLE HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2007, 129 : 1112 - 1116
  • [48] Service user and care giver involvement in mental health system strengthening in Nepal: a qualitative study on barriers and facilitating factors
    Dristy Gurung
    Nawaraj Upadhyaya
    Jananee Magar
    Nir Prakash Giri
    Charlotte Hanlon
    Mark J. D. Jordans
    [J]. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 11
  • [49] Service user and care giver involvement in mental health system strengthening in Nepal: a qualitative study on barriers and facilitating factors
    Gurung, Dristy
    Upadhyaya, Nawaraj
    Magar, Jananee
    Giri, Nir Prakash
    Hanlon, Charlotte
    Jordans, Mark J. D.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2017, 11
  • [50] Service user and family participation in mental health policy making in Timor-Leste: a qualitative study with multiple stakeholders
    Teresa Hall
    Ritsuko Kakuma
    Lisa Palmer
    Harry Minas
    João Martins
    Greg Armstrong
    [J]. BMC Psychiatry, 20