Evaluation of the major changes in eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer pathological staging for prostate cancer treated with prostatectomy

被引:5
|
作者
Xiao, Wen-jun [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Yao [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Ye, Ding-wei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Urol, Shanghai Canc Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2017年 / 12卷 / 11期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0187887
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This study aimed to evaluate the major changes of the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) pathologic staging for prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. A total of 138,176 patients diagnosed with prostate adenocarcinoma undergoing radical prostatectomy were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database during 2004-2014 period. Excluded were cases with incomplete or unavailable staging, PSA and Gleason score information. Two subgroups were established: group a, T2 stage with PSA >= 20ng/ml; group b, T2 stage with Gleason score grade group 5 and PSA<20ng/ml. The median follow-up time was 58 months. The median age at diagnosis for the overall group was 61 years, and the median PSA was 5.7ng/ml. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) at tenth years was 99.3% for T2a/T2b, 99.2% for T2c, respectively. The survival differences between T2a/T2b and T2c did not have statistical significance (P = .323). It was necessary for the current eighth edition to define a single pathologic T2 category, eliminating the subcategories, for all organ-confined disease. CSS at the tenth years was 98.4% for group a, 92.6% for group b, respectively. The prognosis of group a was worse than AJCC II (P = .002). The prognosis of group b was not only worse than AJCC II (P < .001), but also worse than AJCC IIIB. There was necessity to separate the disease with PSA >= 20ng/ml or Gleason score grade group 5 from other organ-confined disease. The present study supported the scientificity of the eighth edition of AJCC pathologic staging for prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The eighth edition American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) melanoma staging system: implications for melanoma treatment and care
    Keung, Emily Z.
    Gershenwald, Jeffrey E.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2018, 18 (08) : 775 - 784
  • [42] Independent Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th Edition Prostate Cancer Staging Classification
    Bhindi, Bimal
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Rangel, Laureano J.
    Mason, Ross J.
    Gettman, Matthew T.
    Frank, Igor
    Tollefson, Matthew K.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    Thompson, R. Houston
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 198 (06): : 1287 - 1295
  • [43] Comparison of the University of Pittsburgh staging system and the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification for the prognostic evaluation of external auditory canal cancer
    Morita, Shinya
    Mizumachi, Takatsugu
    Nakamaru, Yuji
    Sakashita, Tomohiro
    Kano, Satoshi
    Hoshino, Kimiko
    Fukuda, Atsushi
    Fujiwara, Keishi
    Homma, Akihiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 23 (06) : 1029 - 1037
  • [44] Comparison of the University of Pittsburgh staging system and the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification for the prognostic evaluation of external auditory canal cancer
    Shinya Morita
    Takatsugu Mizumachi
    Yuji Nakamaru
    Tomohiro Sakashita
    Satoshi Kano
    Kimiko Hoshino
    Atsushi Fukuda
    Keishi Fujiwara
    Akihiro Homma
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2018, 23 : 1029 - 1037
  • [45] Validation of the Eighth American Joint Committee on Cancer Anatomic and Prognostic Staging System for Breast Cancer
    Yang, Pei-dong
    Peng, Qing-Qin
    Lian, Wei-bin
    Fu, Fang-meng
    Wang, Chuan
    Chen, Debo
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 270 : 539 - 546
  • [46] Outcome evaluation of the 1997 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for prostate carcinoma treated by radiation therapy
    Iyer, RV
    Hanlon, AL
    Pinover, WH
    Hanks, GE
    CANCER, 1999, 85 (08) : 1816 - 1821
  • [47] Setting the stage: Contemporary staging of non-melanomatous skin cancer and implementation of the new American Joint Committee on cancer eighth edition staging manual
    Casswell, Georgina
    Cavanagh, Karda
    Ravi Kumar, Aravind S.
    Giddings, Charles
    McDowell, Lachlan
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 98 : 102 - 108
  • [48] Assessment of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th Edition Staging for Localised Prostate Cancer in Asia Treated with External Beam Radiotherapy
    Wong, Meihua
    Yip, Connie
    Li, Huihua
    Tan, Terence
    Kanesvaran, Ravindran
    Chowbay, Balram
    Tan, Puay Hoon
    Tan, Min-Han
    Wong, Fuh Yong
    ANNALS ACADEMY OF MEDICINE SINGAPORE, 2014, 43 (10) : 484 - 491
  • [49] Analysis of the seventh edition of American Joint Committee on colon cancer staging
    Lan, Yuan-Tzu
    Yang, Shung-Haur
    Chang, Shih-Ching
    Liang, Wen-Yih
    Li, Anna Fen-Yau
    Wang, Huann-Sheng
    Jiang, Jeng-Kai
    Chen, Wei-Shone
    Lin, Tzu-Chen
    Lin, Jen-Kou
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 27 (05) : 657 - 663
  • [50] Analysis of the seventh edition of American Joint Committee on colon cancer staging
    Yuan-Tzu Lan
    Shung-Haur Yang
    Shih-Ching Chang
    Wen-Yih Liang
    Anna Fen-Yau Li
    Huann-Sheng Wang
    Jeng-Kai Jiang
    Wei-Shone Chen
    Tzu-Chen Lin
    Jen-Kou Lin
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2012, 27 : 657 - 663