Myths and facts about getting an academic faculty position in neuroscience

被引:13
|
作者
Hsu, Nina S. [1 ]
Rezai-Zadeh, K. Paul [1 ]
Tennekoon, Michael S. [1 ]
Korn, Stephen J. [1 ]
机构
[1] NINDS, Off Training & Workforce Dev, Neurosci Ctr, Div Extramural Act,NIH, 6001 Execut Blvd,Suite 3309, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
Hiring process - National Institutes of Health - Neurological disorders - New faculties - Publication history;
D O I
10.1126/sciadv.abj2604
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke routinely receive questions and statements from trainees and faculty that suggest widespread beliefs about the necessity of a National Institutes of Health K99/R00 award, other prior funding, and/or specific types of publications for obtaining one's first tenure-track position in neuroscience. To address these beliefs, we examined the funding and publication history of a cohort of investigators who began their first academic faculty position between 2009 and 2019, and we interviewed several senior academic leaders with extensive experience in hiring new faculty. Our data show that <11% of newly hired faculty had a K99/R00 award and that neither prior funding nor papers in prestigious journals were necessary to obtain a tenure-track faculty position. Interviews with academic leaders almost uniformly referred to critically important factors that were considered to be more important in the hiring process than funding or publishing in high-profile journals.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条