Monitoring and Dispersion Modeling of Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (PBDEs) in the Ambient Air of Two Municipal Solid Waste Incinerators and a Coal-fired Power Plant

被引:14
|
作者
Tu, Li-Kai [3 ,4 ]
Wu, Yee-Lin [3 ,4 ]
Wang, Lin-Chi [1 ,2 ]
Chang-Chien, Guo-Ping [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cheng Shiu Univ, Dept Chem & Mat Engn, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
[2] Cheng Shiu Univ, Super Micro Mass Res & Technol Ctr, Kaohsiung 833, Taiwan
[3] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Environm Engn, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
[4] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Sustainable Environm Res Ctr, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
关键词
Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs); Municipal solid waste incinerators; Coal-fired power plant; Stack flue gases; Dispersion; BROMINATED FLAME RETARDANTS; DIBENZO-P-DIOXINS; CENTRAL TAIWAN; HUMAN EXPOSURE; HUMAN-MILK; EMISSIONS; IDENTIFICATION; PERSPECTIVE; CONSUMPTION; COMBUSTION;
D O I
10.4209/aaqr.2011.09.0152
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The concentration of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) in the ambient air of two municipal solid waste incinerators (MSWIs) and one coal-fired power plant (TPP) were determined. Along with the sites mentioned above, eight ambient air samples were collected. Cluster analysis was carried out to determine the relationship of PBDE characteristics between each site. Finally, PBDE dispersion modeling in the atmosphere was applied by using ISCST3 (Industrial Source Complex Short Term 3) to assess the impact of the above two municipal solid waste incinerators and one coal-fired power plant on the ambient air. The total-PBDE concentrations in the ambient air were between 24.9 and 139 pg/Nm(3), averaging 59.8 pg/Nm(3) (n = 16). The BDE-209, BDE-47 and BDE-207 were the most predominant three among all 30 PBDE congeners, which contributed more than 58%, 9%, and 4% of total-PBDE mass to the ambient air, respectively. The results of cluster analysis indicated that no direct correlations existed among the emission sources (MSWI-A, MSWI-B, TPP) and the receptors (sampling sites). From the results of dispersion modeling, the annual total PBDE concentration in ambient air contributed by the MSWI-A, MSWI-B, TPP together were found to be 0.0259% +/- 0.0208%. Hence, the results of both cluster analysis and dispersion modeling showed that MWSI-A, MSWI-B, and TPP were definitely not the major contributors of PBDEs to the ambient air environment. The ashes collected from the air pollution control devices of both the MSWIs and the TPP are probably a more important environmental issue and therefore should be paid more attention to.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 122
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [31] SO2 DISPERSION MODELING EMITTED FROM HONGSA COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT TRANSBOUNDARY TO NAN PROVINCE, THAILAND
    Srirattana, Supawan
    Piaowan, Kitsanateen
    GEOGRAPHIA TECHNICA, 2020, 15 (01): : 102 - 111
  • [32] Dynamic modeling, validation and analysis of direct air-cooling condenser with integration to the coal-fired power plant for flexible operation
    Zhu, Mingjuan
    Wu, Xiao
    Shen, Jiong
    Lee, Kwang
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 245 (245)
  • [33] The distribution and sea–air transfer of volatile mercury in waste post-desulfurization seawater discharged from a coal-fired power plant
    Lumin Sun
    Shanshan Lin
    Lifeng Feng
    Shuyuan Huang
    Dongxing Yuan
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2013, 20 : 6191 - 6200
  • [34] Environmental Performance of a Solid Waste Monetization Process Applied to a Coal-Fired Power Plant with Semi-Dry Flue Gas Desulfurization
    Cruz, Matheus de Andrade
    Vieira de Castro, Rui de Paula
    Fernandes Araujo, Ofelia de Queiroz
    de Medeiros, Jose Luiz
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF ENERGY WATER AND ENVIRONMENT SYSTEMS-JSDEWES, 2019, 7 (03): : 506 - 520
  • [35] Pilot-tests of the coal-fired power plant indirect coupling with multi-source organic solid waste incineration technology
    Zhang, Rui
    Cao, Jun
    Lei, Ling
    Cao, Yufei
    Liu, Dong
    FUEL, 2024, 369
  • [36] Optimizing Two-Phase Flow Heat Transfer: DCS Hybrid Modeling and Automation in Coal-Fired Power Plant Boilers
    Yan, Ming
    Lu, Caijiang
    Shi, Pan
    Zhang, Meiling
    Zhang, Jiawei
    Wang, Liang
    FRONTIERS IN HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2024, 22 : 615 - 631
  • [37] The distribution and sea-air transfer of volatile mercury in waste post-desulfurization seawater discharged from a coal-fired power plant
    Sun, Lumin
    Lin, Shanshan
    Feng, Lifeng
    Huang, Shuyuan
    Yuan, Dongxing
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2013, 20 (09) : 6191 - 6200
  • [38] Dynamic modeling and comprehensive analysis of direct air-cooling coal-fired power plant integrated with carbon capture for reliable, economic and flexible operation
    Zhu, Mingjuan
    Liu, Yudong
    Wu, Xiao
    Shen, Jiong
    ENERGY, 2023, 263
  • [39] Energy and Exergy Analysis of a New Cogeneration Heating System Based on Condensed Waste-Heat Utilization in the Direct Air Cooling Coal-Fired Power Plant
    Zhang, Hongsheng
    Liu, Xingang
    Liu, Yifeng
    Hao, Ruijun
    Liu, Chengjun
    Duan, Chenghong
    Dou, Zhan
    Qin, Jiyun
    JOURNAL OF ENERGY ENGINEERING, 2022, 148 (02)
  • [40] Burner air-fuel ratio monitoring in large pulverised-fuel boilers using advanced sensors: Case study of a 660 MWe coal-fired power plant
    Blondeau, J.
    Rijmenans, L.
    Annendijck, J.
    Heyer, A.
    Martensen, E.
    Popin, I
    Wijittongruang, A.
    Holub, L.
    THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2018, 5 : 471 - 481