Influence of labor induction on obstetric outcomes in patients with prolonged pregnancy: a comparison between elective labor induction and spontaneous onset of labor beyond term

被引:21
|
作者
Bodner-Adler, B
Bodner, K
Pateisky, N
Kimberger, O
Chalubinski, K
Mayerhofer, K
Husslein, P
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Sch Med, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Vienna, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
prolonged pregnancy; induction of labor; delivery outcome;
D O I
10.1007/s00508-005-0330-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Prolonged pregnancy is the most frequent reason for induction of labor. This study aims to determine the effects of labor induction on delivery outcome and to quantify the risks of cesarean delivery associated with labor induction in post-date pregnancies. Patients and methods: This retrospective case-control study included a total of 205 women who reached 42 weeks' gestation (41 weeks and 3 days) between January 2002 and April 2004 and who were scheduled for induction of labor with vaginal prostaglandins. These cases were matched for age and parity with controls in spontaneous labor beyond 41 weeks' gestation. Women with any additional medical or obstetric risk factors were excluded from the study. Maternal, neonatal and delivery outcomes were the main variables of interest. Results: During the study period the data of 410 women were available for analysis. Our data revealed that the use of amniotomy (p = 0.02), oxytocin (p = 0.006) and epidural analgesia (p = 0.001) was increased significantly in the induction group compared with the control group of women with spontaneous onset of labor beyond term. The frequency of cesarean delivery and vacuum extraction was also significantly higher in the induction group (p = 0.0001). The Bishop score before induction was an important factor that affected the delivery outcome, resulting in significantly higher rates of cesarean section and vacuum extraction when the score was unfavorable (p = 0.0001). A univariate regression model revealed induction per se (p = 0.0001), primiparity (p = 0.0001), increased maternal age (p = 0.006) and an unfavorable Bishop score (p = 0.0001) as statistically significant risk factors for cesarean section. In a multivariate logistic regression model, primiparity (p = 0.03), increased maternal age (p = 0.02) and an unfavorable Bishop score (p = 0.01) remained independent risk factors for cesarean section. High infant birth weight was also an independent risk factor (p = 0.03). Conclusions: Our data suggest that women undergoing labor induction because of prolonged pregnancy should be sufficiently informed regarding the risks of a cesarean section or a vacuum extraction. Furthermore, the option of elective cesarean section should be considered, particularly in primiparous women with an unfavorable cervix, higher age, and high estimated infant birth weight.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 292
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] STATISTICAL COMPARISON IN A CONTROLLED TRIAL OF ELECTIVE INDUCTION OF LABOR
    BAKKETEIG, LS
    PETERSEN, SO
    BERGSJO, P
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1980, 59 (02) : 191 - 192
  • [42] Neonatal outcomes of elective labor induction in low-risk term pregnancies
    Bengtsson, Frida
    Ekeus, Cecilia
    Hagelroth, Amelie
    Ahlsson, Fredrik
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [43] Neonatal outcomes of elective labor induction in low-risk term pregnancies
    Frida Bengtsson
    Cecilia Ekéus
    Amelie Hagelroth
    Fredrik Ahlsson
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [44] A COMPARISON OF EARLY AND DELAYED INDUCTION OF LABOR WITH SPONTANEOUS RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM
    WAGNER, MV
    CHIN, VP
    PETERS, CJ
    DREXLER, B
    NEWMAN, LA
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1989, 74 (01): : 93 - 97
  • [45] Elective Induction of Labor at Term Compared With Expectant Management Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes
    Darney, Blair G.
    Snowden, Jonathan M.
    Cheng, Yvonne W.
    Jacob, Lorie
    Nicholson, James M.
    Kaimal, Anjali
    Dublin, Sascha
    Getahun, Darios
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 122 (04): : 761 - 769
  • [46] Induction or spontaneous labor for pregnant patients on anticoagulants?
    Mauny, Lea
    Peyronnet, Violaine
    Peynaud-Debayle, Edith
    Picone, Olivier
    Nebout, Sophie
    Mandelbrot, Laurent
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 52 (07)
  • [47] Comparison between Sublingual and Vaginal Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term
    Tayyba, Aalia
    Mehreen
    Nosheen
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2013, 7 (04): : 1038 - 1041
  • [48] Comparison of Misoprostol and Oxytocin for Induction of Labor in Post-Term Pregnancy
    Fareed, Amna
    Faisal, Jaweria
    Kanwal, Sadia
    Fatima, Ambreen
    Afridi, Nighat
    Fatima
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 14 (03): : 1479 - 1481
  • [49] Membrane sweeping at term to promote spontaneous labor and reduce the likelihood of formal labor induction for prolonged pregnancy, in South Asia and the world: A meta-analysis
    Jayasundara, D. M. C. S.
    Jayawardane, I. A.
    Denuwara, H. M. B. H.
    Jayasingha, T. D. K. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2024, 166 (02) : 567 - 579
  • [50] Spontaneous Labor Onset and Outcomes in Obese Women at Term
    Frolova, Antonina I.
    Wang, Judy J.
    Conner, Shayna N.
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    Macones, George A.
    Woolfolk, Candice L.
    Cahill, Alison G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2018, 35 (01) : 59 - 64