Influence of labor induction on obstetric outcomes in patients with prolonged pregnancy: a comparison between elective labor induction and spontaneous onset of labor beyond term

被引:21
|
作者
Bodner-Adler, B
Bodner, K
Pateisky, N
Kimberger, O
Chalubinski, K
Mayerhofer, K
Husslein, P
机构
[1] Univ Vienna, Sch Med, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Vienna, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
关键词
prolonged pregnancy; induction of labor; delivery outcome;
D O I
10.1007/s00508-005-0330-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Prolonged pregnancy is the most frequent reason for induction of labor. This study aims to determine the effects of labor induction on delivery outcome and to quantify the risks of cesarean delivery associated with labor induction in post-date pregnancies. Patients and methods: This retrospective case-control study included a total of 205 women who reached 42 weeks' gestation (41 weeks and 3 days) between January 2002 and April 2004 and who were scheduled for induction of labor with vaginal prostaglandins. These cases were matched for age and parity with controls in spontaneous labor beyond 41 weeks' gestation. Women with any additional medical or obstetric risk factors were excluded from the study. Maternal, neonatal and delivery outcomes were the main variables of interest. Results: During the study period the data of 410 women were available for analysis. Our data revealed that the use of amniotomy (p = 0.02), oxytocin (p = 0.006) and epidural analgesia (p = 0.001) was increased significantly in the induction group compared with the control group of women with spontaneous onset of labor beyond term. The frequency of cesarean delivery and vacuum extraction was also significantly higher in the induction group (p = 0.0001). The Bishop score before induction was an important factor that affected the delivery outcome, resulting in significantly higher rates of cesarean section and vacuum extraction when the score was unfavorable (p = 0.0001). A univariate regression model revealed induction per se (p = 0.0001), primiparity (p = 0.0001), increased maternal age (p = 0.006) and an unfavorable Bishop score (p = 0.0001) as statistically significant risk factors for cesarean section. In a multivariate logistic regression model, primiparity (p = 0.03), increased maternal age (p = 0.02) and an unfavorable Bishop score (p = 0.01) remained independent risk factors for cesarean section. High infant birth weight was also an independent risk factor (p = 0.03). Conclusions: Our data suggest that women undergoing labor induction because of prolonged pregnancy should be sufficiently informed regarding the risks of a cesarean section or a vacuum extraction. Furthermore, the option of elective cesarean section should be considered, particularly in primiparous women with an unfavorable cervix, higher age, and high estimated infant birth weight.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 292
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The impact of elective induction of labor on cesareans and obstetric outcomes
    Souter, Vivienne L.
    Painter, Ian
    Sitcov, Kristin
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S24 - S24
  • [2] Comparison of outcomes between induction of labor and spontaneous labor for term breech - A systemic review and meta analysis
    Sun, Wen
    Liu, Fen
    Liu, Shiliang
    Craton, Sara-Michelle
    El-Chaar, Darine
    Wen, Shi Wu
    Chen, Dunjin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 222 : 155 - 160
  • [3] ELECTIVE INDUCTION OF LABOR AT TERM
    MILES, LM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1951, 62 (03) : 649 - 653
  • [4] Influence of labor induction on obstetric outcomes in patients with prolonged pregnancyA comparison between elective labor induction and spontaneous onset of labor beyond termEinfluss der Geburtseinleitung auf mütterliche und kindliche Faktoren bei Patientinnen mit TerminüberschreitungEin Vergleich zwischen elektiver Einleitung und spontanem Wehenbeginn bei übertragener Schwangerschaft
    Barbara Bodner-Adler
    Klaus Bodner
    Norbert Pateisky
    Oliver Kimberger
    Kinga Chalubinski
    Klaus Mayerhofer
    Peter Husslein
    Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2005, 117 : 287 - 292
  • [5] Newborn outcomes after elective induction of labor at term
    Painter, Ian
    Souter, Vivienne L.
    Sitcov, Kristin
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (01) : S130 - S131
  • [6] Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term
    Souter, Vivienne
    Painter, Ian
    Sitcov, Kristin
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (03) : 273.e1 - 273.e11
  • [7] Term Elective Induction of Labor and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Obese Women and Their Offspring
    Fulginiti, Adriana
    Alexander, Gabrielle
    Henderson, Cassandra E.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 (06): : 1161 - +
  • [8] Term Elective Induction of Labor and Pregnancy Outcomes Among Obese Women and Their Offspring
    Pickens, Cassandra M. Gibbs
    Kramer, Michael R.
    Howards, Penelope P.
    Badell, Martina L.
    Caughey, Aaron B.
    Hogue, Carol J.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 131 (01): : 12 - 22
  • [9] GUIDELINES FOR INDUCTION OF LABOR IN PROLONGED PREGNANCY
    MARTINS, CDP
    MARQUES, AMD
    ANDREUCCI, D
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1969, 34 (06): : 830 - +
  • [10] Maternal Outcomes of Prolonged Induction of Labor
    Triebwasser, Jourdan
    VanArtsdalen, Jamie
    Kobernik, Emily
    Langen, Elizabeth
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 129 : 185S - 185S