Current procedures for applying risk assessment in genetically modified crops

被引:0
|
作者
Aniol, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Plant Breeding & Acclimatizat Inst, PL-05870 Blonie, Poland
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The rapidly increasing utilization of transgenic cultivars in agriculture and emergence of genetically modified (GM) plants and plant products on the market calls for effective risk assessment procedures to be developed and applied in handling applications for GM plant release and marketing. The main producers of transgenic crops are at the same time also major exporters of agricultural products. Therefore there is an urgent need to develop internationally standardized and consistent schemes, test procedures and concepts of risk assessment. In this paper the procedures of risk assessment of transgenic are reviewed with special reference to procedures adopted by the European Union as exemplified in EU Directive 90/220, and procedures enforced in the USA. Special attention is given to the principle of substantial equivalence of the transgenic plant and the receiver plant as it was developed in the USA in the context of the dispute over labeling & consumer choice and precautionary principles as stressed in Europe. An example of general procedure is presented as proposed by the Danish group in the form of a three-step hierarchical frame for risk assessment. The main idea of the hierarchical procedure is that experimental tests and model simulations of varying complexity are applied at each level: individual plant, populations and the ecosystem. The perspectives of the adoption of generally accepted concepts and procedures of risk assessment are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 170
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Characteristics and safety assessment of intractable proteins in genetically modified crops
    Bushey, Dean F.
    Bannon, Gary A.
    Delaney, Bryan F.
    Graser, Gerson
    Hefford, Mary
    Jiang, Xiaoxu
    Lee, Thomas C.
    Madduri, Krishna M.
    Pariza, Michael
    Privalle, Laura S.
    Ranjan, Rakesh
    Saab-Rincon, Gloria
    Schafer, Barry W.
    Thelen, Jay J.
    Zhang, John X. Q.
    Harper, Marc S.
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 248
  • [42] Allergenicity assessment of genetically modified crops—what makes sense?
    Richard E Goodman
    Stefan Vieths
    Hugh A Sampson
    David Hill
    Motohiro Ebisawa
    Steve L Taylor
    Ronald van Ree
    [J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2008, 26 : 73 - 81
  • [43] Genetically modified crops: success, safety assessment, and public concern
    Singh, Om V.
    Ghai, Shivani
    Paul, Debarati
    Jain, Rakesh K.
    [J]. APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 71 (05) : 598 - 607
  • [44] ASSESSMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT SAFETY ISSUES RELATED TO GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS
    Pawar, Bhausaheb D.
    Jadhav, Ashok S.
    [J]. EVERYMANS SCIENCE, 2014, 49 (03): : 153 - 158
  • [45] Grower response to contracts and risk in genetically modified (GM) crops
    Wilson, William W.
    Dahl, Bruce L.
    Maxwell, Brett J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2007, 32 (01) : 135 - 153
  • [46] An overview of general features of risk assessments of genetically modified crops
    Wendy Craig
    Mark Tepfer
    Giuliano Degrassi
    Decio Ripandelli
    [J]. Euphytica, 2008, 164 : 853 - 880
  • [47] Legitimation in a world at risk: The case of genetically modified crops in India
    Revathi, E.
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 48 (1-2) : 163 - 166
  • [48] Globalisation and transboundary risk regulation: pesticides and genetically modified crops
    Tait, J
    Bruce, A
    [J]. HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY, 2001, 3 (01) : 99 - 112
  • [49] An overview of general features of risk assessments of genetically modified crops
    Craig, Wendy
    Tepfer, Mark
    Degrassi, Giuliano
    Ripandelli, Decio
    [J]. EUPHYTICA, 2008, 164 (03) : 853 - 880
  • [50] Legitimation in a World at Risk: The Case of Genetically Modified Crops in India
    Ramanna-Pathak, Anitha
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2019, 124 (06) : 1923 - 1925