The effect of the Alive & Thrive initiative on exclusive breastfeeding in rural Burkina Faso: a repeated cross-sectional cluster randomised controlled trial

被引:22
|
作者
Cresswell, Jenny A. [1 ]
Ganaba, Rasmane [2 ]
Sarrassat, Sophie [1 ]
Some, Henri [2 ]
Diallo, Abdoulaye Hama [3 ,4 ]
Cousens, Simon [1 ]
Filippi, Veronique [1 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, MARCH Ctr Maternal Adolescent Reprod & Child Hlth, London, England
[2] AFRICSante, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
[3] Ctr MURAZ, Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
[4] Univ Ouaga Pr Joseph Ki Zerbo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
来源
LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH | 2019年 / 7卷 / 03期
基金
比尔及梅琳达.盖茨基金会;
关键词
INTERVENTIONS; OUTCOMES; INFANT;
D O I
10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30494-7
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background The benefits of exclusive breastfeeding on mortality, health, and development of children have been well documented. In Burkina Faso, the Alive & Thrive initiative combined interpersonal communication and community mobilisation activities with the aim of improving knowledge, beliefs, skills, and, ultimately, breastfeeding outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of the Alive & Thrive initiative on exclusive breastfeeding in Boucle du Mouhoun, Burkina Faso. Methods We did a cluster-randomised trial with data collected with two independent, population-representative, cross-sectional surveys: a baseline survey done before the start of the initiative implementation and an endline survey done 2 years later. Rural villages in Boucle du Mouhoun, Burkina Faso, were randomly allocated by use of computer generated pseudo-random numbers, and women were eligible for participation if they had a livebirth in the 12 months preceding the survey and resided in a village selected for the study. The primary outcome was exclusive breastfeeding among infants younger than 6 months. Masking was not possible for the intervention implementation. All women who participated in the trial were included in the analysis population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02435524. Findings Between June 2 and July 28, 2015, 2288 mothers participated in the baseline survey and between June 12 and July 25, 2017, 2253 mothers participated in the endline survey. At endline, there was a risk difference of 38.9% (95% CI 32.2-45.6, p<0.001) between the reported prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding in the intervention group and that of the control group. Interpretation A multidimensional intervention deliverable at scale in a low-income setting resulted in substantial increases in mothers' optimal breastfeeding knowledge and beliefs and in reported exclusive breastfeeding practices. However, it is possible that the findings might have been influenced by social desirability bias. Copyright (C) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:E357 / E365
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of a mass radio campaign on family behaviours and child survival in Burkina Faso: a repeated cross-sectional, cluster-randomised trial
    Sarrassat, Sophie
    Meda, Nicolas
    Badolo, Hermann
    Ouedraogo, Moctar
    Some, Henri
    Bambara, Robert
    Murray, Joanna
    Remes, Pieter
    Lavoie, Matthiew
    Cousens, Simon
    Head, Roy
    LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2018, 6 (03): : E330 - E341
  • [2] Determinants of individual healthcare expenditure: A cross-sectional analysis in rural Burkina Faso
    Nakovics, Meike Irene
    Brenner, Stephan
    Robyn, Paul Jacob
    Tapsoba, Ludovic Deo Gracias
    De Allegri, Manuela
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 34 (04): : E1478 - E1494
  • [3] The effect of a combined intervention on exclusive breastfeeding in primiparas: A randomised controlled trial
    Puharic, Drita
    Malicki, Mario
    Borovac, Josip Andelo
    Sparac, Vladimir
    Poljak, Boris
    Aracic, Nada
    Marinovic, Nero
    Luetic, Nives
    Zakarija-Grkovic, Irena
    MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION, 2020, 16 (03):
  • [4] Effect of community-based promotion of exclusive breastfeeding on diarrhoeal illness and growth: a cluster randomised controlled trial
    Bhandari, N
    Bahl, R
    Mazumdar, S
    Martines, J
    Black, RE
    Bhan, MK
    LANCET, 2003, 361 (9367): : 1418 - 1423
  • [5] Analysis of the cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomised trial
    Hemming, Karla
    Taljaard, Monica
    Forbes, Andrew
    TRIALS, 2016, 17
  • [6] Assessment Of Maternity Staff Training And Knowledge Of Obstetric Care In Burkina Faso: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study
    Baguiya, Adama
    Meda, Ivlabehire Bertrand
    Coulibaly, Abou
    Fayama, Mahamadou
    Ouedraogo, Djeneba Sanon
    Zan, Souleymane
    Belemvire, Seydou
    Ouedraogo, Henri Gautier
    Kouanda, Seni
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2019, 11 : 577 - 588
  • [7] Analysis of cluster randomised stepped wedge trials with repeated cross-sectional samples
    Hemming, Karla
    Taljaard, Monica
    Forbes, Andrew
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [8] Analysis of cluster randomised stepped wedge trials with repeated cross-sectional samples
    Karla Hemming
    Monica Taljaard
    Andrew Forbes
    Trials, 18
  • [9] Effect of the Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative on the duration of exclusive breastfeeding in Kinshasa: A cluster randomized trial
    Babakazo, P.
    Donnen, P.
    Mapatano, M. A.
    Lulebo, A.
    Okitolonda, E.
    REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2015, 63 (05): : 285 - 292
  • [10] Determinants of attendance in antenatal care clinics in rural settings in Mali and Burkina Faso: a cross-sectional study
    Joel D. Bognini
    Kadiatou Koita
    Jean-Baptiste N’takpe
    Biébo Bihoun
    Mahamadou Dembélé
    Oumou Coulibaly
    Toussaint Rouamba
    Efundem Agboraw
    Sirima Traoré
    Dario Scaramuzzi
    Eve Worrall
    Jenny Hill
    Kassoum Kayentao
    Halidou Tinto
    Valérie Briand
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 25 (1)