Comparison of Surface Permanent Magnet Coaxial and Cycloidal Radial Flux Magnetic Gears

被引:0
|
作者
Gardner, Matthew C. [1 ]
Johnson, Matthew [1 ]
Toliyat, Hamid A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
关键词
coaxial magnetic gear; cycloidal magnetic gear; finite element analysis; magnet utilization; magnetic force; magnetic gear; permanent magnet; radial flux; torque density; torque ripple;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Magnetic gears transform power between lowtorque, high-speed rotation and high-torque, low-speed rotation using magnetic fields instead of interlocking teeth. This paper uses an extensive parametric finite element analysis study to quantitatively compare the optimal performances of two of the most promising magnetic gear topologies, radial flux coaxial magnetic gears and radial flux cycloidal magnetic gears, in terms of volumetric torque density and permanent magnet gravimetric torque density. At low gear ratios, optimal coaxial gears generally achieve higher torque densities than optimal cycloidal gears. However, at medium and high gear ratios, the cycloidal topology can generally outperform the coaxial topology in both of these metrics unless very thick magnets are used. Additionally, the cycloidal magnetic gear can realistically achieve much higher gear ratios than the coaxial magnetic gear, but the optimal gear ratio for a cycloidal design varies with other design parameters, such as outer radius. However, cycloidal designs suffer from significant fabrication challenges because one rotor's axis orbits the axis of the other rotor. Additionally, cycloidal magnetic gear rotors experience strong magnetic forces, which must be supported by the bearings, whereas the net magnetic forces on each rotor in a coaxial magnetic gear can be canceled out using symmetry.
引用
收藏
页码:5005 / 5012
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Optimal Design of Magnetic Gears With a General Pattern of Permanent Magnet Arrangement
    Fu, W. N.
    Li, Longnv
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED SUPERCONDUCTIVITY, 2016, 26 (07)
  • [42] FE analysis and CAD of radial-flux surface mounted permanent magnet brushless DC motors
    Upadhyay, PR
    Rajagopal, KR
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2005, 41 (10) : 3952 - 3954
  • [43] Double-rotor Ironless Radial Flux Permanent Magnet Machine
    Oosthuizen, G. I.
    Randewijk, P. J.
    2014 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL MACHINES (ICEM), 2014, : 496 - 501
  • [44] Optimization and Design for a Radial Flux Permanent Magnet Motor for Electric Vehicle
    Neji, R.
    Tounsi, S.
    Sellami, F.
    JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, 2005, 1 (04) : 47 - 68
  • [45] DESIGN OF A NOVEL AXIAL-RADIAL FLUX PERMANENT MAGNET MOTOR
    Wei, Xubiao
    Yang, Kai
    Pan, Zhicheng
    Xie, Hongqin
    Zhu, Cheng
    Zhang, Yingli
    2014 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL MACHINES AND SYSTEMS (ICEMS), 2014, : 80 - 84
  • [46] Comprehensive Comparison of Rotor Permanent Magnet and Stator Permanent Magnet Flux-Switching Machines
    Su, Peng
    Hua, Wei
    Wu, Zhongze
    Chen, Zhe
    Zhang, Gan
    Cheng, Ming
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2019, 66 (08) : 5862 - 5871
  • [47] A Novel Radial-Axial Flux Switching Permanent Magnet Generator
    Dehdez, Mohammad Ali Noroozi
    Milimonfared, Jafar
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2022, 69 (12) : 12096 - 12106
  • [48] Performance comparison of dual-rotor Radial-Flux and Axial-Flux Permanent-Magnet BLDC machines
    Qu, RH
    Aydin, M
    Lipo, TA
    IEEE IEMDC'03: IEEE INTERNATIONAL ELECTRIC MACHINES AND DRIVES CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, 2003, : 1948 - 1954
  • [49] Comparison of the Characteristics of Coaxial Magnetic Gears with PM and AC Excitation
    Shin, Homin
    Chang, Junghwan
    2016 IEEE CONFERENCE ON ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD COMPUTATION (CEFC), 2016,
  • [50] Optimization and Comparison of Coaxial Magnetic Gears With and Without Back Iron
    Goebl, Elisabeth
    Jungmayr, Gerald
    Marth, Edmund
    Amrhein, Wolfgang
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2018, 54 (11)