Recent Trends in Medicaid Spending and Use of Drugs With US Food and Drug Administration Accelerated Approval

被引:15
|
作者
Sachs, Rachel E. [1 ]
Gavulic, Kyle A. [2 ]
Donohue, Julie M. [3 ]
Dusetzina, Stacie B. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Law, One Brookings Dr,Campus Box 1120, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] Yale Sch Med, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Vanderbilt Ingram Canc Ctr, Nashville, TN USA
[5] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Policy, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
来源
JAMA HEALTH FORUM | 2021年 / 2卷 / 10期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.3177
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Question How much do prescription drugs approved through the US Food and Drug Administration's accelerated approval program contribute to state Medicaid program spending? Findings In this cross-sectional study of 216 drugs granted accelerated approval from 1992 through 2020, relative to all drugs paid for by Medicaid, products with accelerated approval comprised less than 1% of use. Despite their infrequent use, annual net spending on drugs with accelerated approval represented 6.4% to 9.1% of net spending on all drugs covered by Medicaid (in 2015 and 2018, respectively). Meaning Medicaid spending on drugs with accelerated approval represents an outsized amount of spending relative to their use. Importance State Medicaid programs have reported concerns about rising drug prices and spending, particularly regarding drugs entering the market through the accelerated approval program under the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The accelerated approval program enables the FDA to approve drugs on the basis of unverified surrogate end points, meaning that clinical benefits for these products are uncertain at the time of approval. However, state Medicaid programs are legally required to cover these drugs. Little is known about the set of products with accelerated approval over time, their use among Medicaid beneficiaries, or the magnitude of their financial influence on state Medicaid programs. Objective To identify the number and class of drugs approved through the FDA's accelerated approval pathway and analyze state Medicaid programs' use and spending on these drugs from 2015 through 2019. Design, Setting, and Participants In this cross-sectional study, biannual FDA reports were used to identify products granted accelerated approval and their associated indications approved between December 1992 and December 2020. State Medicaid Drug Utilization Data files available for 1992 through 2019 were used to estimate national totals for spending and use of outpatient drugs. Main Outcomes and Measures National Medicaid use and gross and net spending on drugs with accelerated approval from 2015 through 2019. Results Since the inception of the FDA's accelerated approval pathway in 1992 through 2020, 216 product-indication pairs granted accelerated approval were identified, comprising 149 unique products. The composition of drugs approved through the pathway has changed over time, with 28 of 30 (93.3%) product-indication pairs receiving accelerated approval in 2020 being indicated for cancer. Relative to all outpatient prescription drugs paid for by Medicaid, products with accelerated approval ranged from 0.2% to 0.4% of use (1.3-2.4 million prescriptions annually). Despite their infrequent use, drugs with accelerated approval represented a minimum annual net spending on all drugs covered by Medicaid of 6.4% ($2.2 billion of $34.6 billion) in 2015 and a maximum of 9.1% ($2.5 billion of $27.6 billion) in 2018. Estimated annual gross spending on drugs with accelerated approval ranged from $4.2 billion to $4.9 billion over 2015 through 2019, and estimated net spending from $2.2 billion to $2.6 billion. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study of 216 drugs granted accelerated approval, state spending on drugs approved through the FDA's growing accelerated approval program represented an outsized amount of spending relative to use. Because drugs with accelerated approval have come to market on the basis of trials using surrogate end points, considerable amounts of this spending may have been attributable to products with unproven clinical benefits. This cross-sectional study identifies the number and class of drugs approved through the US Food and Drug Administration's accelerated approval pathway and analyzes state Medicaid programs' use and spending on these drugs from 2015 through 2019.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Transparency and Dermatologic Device Approval by the US Food and Drug Administration
    Ezaldein, Harib H.
    Scott, Jeffrey F.
    Yin, Emily S.
    Ventura, Alessandra
    DeRuyter, Nicholaas P.
    Leffell, David J.
    [J]. JAMA DERMATOLOGY, 2018, 154 (03) : 273 - 280
  • [32] Product Approval and Public Health at the US Food and Drug Administration
    Lurie, Peter
    Sharfstein, Joshua M.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 326 (24): : 2469 - 2470
  • [33] US Food and Drug Administration Approval of New Drugs Based on Noninferiority Trials in Oncology A Dangerous Precedent?
    Gyawali, Bishal
    Kesselheim, Aaron S.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2019, 5 (05) : 607 - 608
  • [34] US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Drugs for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A New Era Has Begun
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (04) : 362 - 364
  • [35] Patient Participation in Clinical Trials of Oncology Drugs and Biologics Preceding Approval by the US Food and Drug Administration
    Hutchinson, Nora
    Carlisle, Benjamin
    Doussau, Adelaide
    Bosan, Rafia
    Gumnit, Eli
    MacPherson, Amanda
    Fergusson, Dean A.
    Kimmelman, Jonathan
    [J]. JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (05) : E2110456
  • [36] ACMT Position Statement: Position on the Recent Judicial Challenge of US Food and Drug Administration Approval of Mifepristone
    Mazer-Amirshahi, Maryann
    Stolbach, Andrew I. I.
    Ye, Peggy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2023, 19 (04) : 414 - 415
  • [37] The US Food and Drug Administration Cardiorenal Advisory Panel and the drug approval process
    Roden, DM
    Temple, R
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2005, 111 (13) : 1697 - 1702
  • [38] Gleevec™ for the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia:: US food and drug administration regulatory mechanisms, accelerated approval, and orphan drug status
    Cohen, MH
    Moses, ML
    Pazdur, R
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2002, 7 (05): : 390 - 392
  • [39] Medicare Spending on Drugs With Accelerated Approval, 2015-2019
    Rome, Benjamin N.
    Feldman, William B.
    Kesselheim, Aaron S.
    [J]. JAMA HEALTH FORUM, 2021, 2 (12): : E213937
  • [40] Food and drug administration approval process for dermatology drugs in the United States
    Boozalis, Emily
    Semenov, Yevgeniy R.
    Kwatra, Shawn G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2018, 29 (06) : 536 - 538